
 |
|
 |
| AR General Discussion General topics relating to the AR |

04-19-09, 15:27
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 574
|
|
|
Colt Socom Heavy Barrel questions...
Just wanted to see if anyone had input on these barrels. I've read that they were made for full auto fire for Spec Ops guys. How does everyone like theres? And is it worth to buy? I'm having a hard time finding them, I emailed S.A.W. and they have yet to reply. And I'm not too sure about buying anything from Gunbroker just yet.
|

04-19-09, 15:42
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 737
|
|
|
__________________
Member of the General Population
Last edited by Molon; 04-19-09 at 15:44
|

04-19-09, 18:20
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,626
|
|
|
Unless you are planning a FA weapon they will really serve you no use and the extra weight up front is not helpful.
|

04-19-09, 18:58
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 574
|
|
Ic, I figure it would be one of those "hey look what I have" things. Thanks for the input. I guess I won't be spending time or money on this barrel than.
|

04-20-09, 14:57
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SouthEastern U.S.
Posts: 1,736
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Molon
|
Hey Molon,
Can you list the different muzzle devices you have pictured in your three different pics? I know there is probably a Smith Vortex, and possibly an AAC Blackout? in the first two pics, but not sure which is which? Also, what about that last pic? What is that one? Looks unique with that "ring" milled out portion on the end of the prongs.
Are those first two pics both 14.5" or 16" w/permanently attached muzzle devices?? The profile looks like my Colt 6920 bbl profile (sort of), but the larger diameter "flat" that is directly ahead of the M203 notch, seems to be much shorter than my Colt 6920 bbls, and I always thought Colt just chopped the end of the 16" bbls off, to make a 14.5". ?? What exact bbls are those, and what length?
Finally, in the very first pic, what type of crush washer is that? It appears to be grey, but maybe just the pic?
Thanks.
__________________
"ROLL RIGHT SNIPER!"
Last edited by Razorhunter; 04-20-09 at 15:04
|

04-20-09, 18:46
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dutch Harbor, Alaska
Posts: 215
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Cataldo
Can you list the different muzzle devices you have pictured in your three different pics? I know there is probably a Smith Vortex
|
The M4 barrel has a Smith Enterprise Vortex.
__________________
NRA Life Member
GOA Life Member
Distinguished Rifleman #1558
President's Hundred
|

04-21-09, 01:04
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 737
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Cataldo
Hey Molon,
Can you list the different muzzle devices you have pictured in your three different pics? I know there is probably a Smith Vortex, and possibly an AAC Blackout? in the first two pics, but not sure which is which?
The SOCOM barrel has a Young Manufacturing flash hider.
The standard M4 has a Vortex.
Also, what about that last pic? What is that one? Looks unique with that "ring" milled out portion on the end of the prongs.
The HBAR has an older version of the Vortex.
Are those first two pics both 14.5" or 16" w/permanently attached muzzle devices??
The first two pics are both 14.5" barrels with permanently attached flash hiders.
I always thought Colt just chopped the end of the 16" bbls off, to make a 14.5". ??
Negative.
What exact bbls are those, and what length?
1. Colt 14.5" SOCOM barrel
2. Colt 14.5" M4 barrel
3. Colt 16" HBAR (6721)
Finally, in the very first pic, what type of crush washer is that?
Unknown.
Thanks.
|
S.E. has produced a variety of versions of the Vortex.
__________________
Member of the General Population
Last edited by Molon; 04-21-09 at 01:09
|

04-21-09, 01:41
|
 |
SENIOR STAFF / ADMIN
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Bragg
Posts: 2,873
|
|
|
Not sure we achieved an entirely balanced perspective on this one, as there are some advantages to the HB configuration that reach beyond FA applications, depending upon your usage model. Even in sustained-fire (non-FA) training sessions, these barrels have the advantage of being much slower to heat up, since the extra material acts as something of a heat sink. The potential down side, of course, is that they also take much longer to cool back down, but I wouldn't dismiss the HB out of hand.
Weight might be a relevant issue though, once again, how much of a factor this might be depends upon what you're doing with the weapon, and how much superfluous crap you're bolting onto it. One might counter the weight argument by pointing out that you also get added strength and rigidiity but as before, the degree of benefit or liability is largely dependent upon your applications. Since the added weight is under the handguards, rather than forward of the front sight base, for example, this isn't as much of a handling or balance issue as it might first appear.
I'm not suggesting that the HB is a universal solution for all comers, but neither is it completely devoid of utility. If your preference is for a USGI configuration (i.e. to baseline your personal training carbine to your issued M4, for example), then the HB can actually make a great deal of sense. While I believe the HB fad has come and gone for the most part, there is no reason why these barrels can't anchor an excellent carbine platform. The trend these days is actually in the opposite direction, with pencil barrels rightfully earning high praise, but there is still a place for the HB -- and one such place might just be in your safe, provided this alternate configuration otherwise meets your needs.
AC
__________________
Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils. (Major General John Stark, c. 1809)
Last edited by Army Chief; 04-21-09 at 01:42
|

04-21-09, 02:06
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 574
|
|
A friend of mine always said, instead of lighter gear they need to make stronger Marines lol. Then again he's a Scout Sniper and a hard charger
|

04-21-09, 10:41
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 524
|
|
|
|

05-03-10, 22:35
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,707
|
|
|
Anyone know the weight of an M4 barrel, and an M4A1 barrel, stripped?
__________________
Remember, you can't say awesome without saying wes
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:21.
| |