Go Back   M4Carbine.net Forums > General Firearms > Handguns-Semi Auto

Handguns-Semi Auto A Dedicated Forum for Semi-Automatic Handguns

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 11-11-09, 17:47
adh Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 940
iTrader: (9)
S&W M&P 45 full size....to get with or without safety????

OK, so I sold my last 1911 and will be getting a full size M&P 45
IIRC, I want to say that I read here that it would be better (from an ergonomics standpoint) to get one without the thumb safety, as the placement of the safety is not really in an ideal location and can be problematic for some. Your input please.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 11-11-09, 18:00
decodeddiesel's Avatar
decodeddiesel Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 3,322
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adh View Post
OK, so I sold my last 1911 and will be getting a full size M&P 45
IIRC, I want to say that I read here that it would be better (from an ergonomics standpoint) to get one without the thumb safety, as the placement of the safety is not really in an ideal location and can be problematic for some. Your input please.

Thanks
I find the placement of the safety to be virtually identical to the 1911, so for me it was an easy transition to an M&P45 with the safety.

Last edited by decodeddiesel; 11-11-09 at 18:45
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 11-11-09, 18:07
kwelz's Avatar
kwelz Online
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 2,425
iTrader: (39)
I have had both. I prefer mine without the safety. But that is just a personal preference.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 11-11-09, 18:31
canucksvt Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 48
iTrader: (0)
With the safety

I bought mine with the safety. I have had no issues with it. I am a long time Glock shooter and had limited exposure to 1911's, but the M&P45 safety was not a problem for me to adapt to.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 11-11-09, 19:00
adh Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 940
iTrader: (9)
For those with the safety, do you ride your shooting hand thumb on the safety? I always did with my 1911s.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 11-11-09, 19:07
decodeddiesel's Avatar
decodeddiesel Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 3,322
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adh View Post
For those with the safety, do you ride your shooting hand thumb on the safety? I always did with my 1911s.
Yep. Works very well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 11-11-09, 19:25
Irish's Avatar
Irish Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dagobah
Posts: 6,332
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adh View Post
For those with the safety, do you ride your shooting hand thumb on the safety? I always did with my 1911s.
Absolutely. I have the full size 9mm with thumb safety and find it a natural transition from the 1911 platform.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 11-11-09, 20:49
threeheadeddog Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 474
iTrader: (0)
Shoot one for an extended range session first.
I had a M&P 45 with thumb safty and found that if I shot more than a hundred or so rounds at once my thumb would start to hurt at the knuckle(though for the life of me I cant remember which knuckle ). The "beavertail" area on an MP is substantially wider than on a 1911. Your thumb has to reach around the beavertail to ride it.
I have seen other reports of this problem as well so it would seem I was not alone.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 11-11-09, 20:53
RogerinTPA's Avatar
RogerinTPA Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,252
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adh View Post
For those with the safety, do you ride your shooting hand thumb on the safety? I always did with my 1911s.
Yes. I find it natural to go from the 1911 to the FS M&P45. But it is the only one I own with the safety, just for that reason.
__________________
For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 11-12-09, 12:39
Pappabear's Avatar
Pappabear Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,896
iTrader: (1)
Not to hijack, but to hijack. Is the trigger the same? I have a friend with one for sell and someone asked him, I did not know.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 11-12-09, 14:32
decodeddiesel's Avatar
decodeddiesel Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 3,322
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pappabear View Post
Not to hijack, but to hijack. Is the trigger the same? I have a friend with one for sell and someone asked him, I did not know.


Are you asking is the trigger the same from an M&P to a 1911? The answer would be a resounding no with the qualifier that an M&P trigger can get close with a professional trigger job.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 11-12-09, 14:34
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,686
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adh View Post
OK, so I sold my last 1911 and will be getting a full size M&P 45
IIRC, I want to say that I read here that it would be better (from an ergonomics standpoint) to get one without the thumb safety, as the placement of the safety is not really in an ideal location and can be problematic for some. Your input please.

Thanks
Don't get the thumb safety (bad idea).


C4
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 11-12-09, 14:38
Irish's Avatar
Irish Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dagobah
Posts: 6,332
iTrader: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
Don't get the thumb safety (bad idea).


C4
Grant - Please go into a little more detail, I'd like to hear your thoughts pertaining to why a thumb safety is a bad idea on the M&P.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 11-12-09, 14:39
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,686
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishluck73 View Post
Grant - Please go into a little more detail, I'd like to hear your thoughts pertaining to why a thumb safety is a bad idea on the M&P.
The Safety on the M&P is in a difficult position. With external safeties, you need to be putting your thumb on top of it. This is NOT a very comfortable shooting position and is why I do not recommend them.


C4
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 11-12-09, 14:44
Irish's Avatar
Irish Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dagobah
Posts: 6,332
iTrader: (10)
Gotcha. I've only shot mine once as I tend to practice with the G19 the most. I bought it to see how I'd like it compared to the 1911 and I agree it's not in as natural a position for me. I'm taking it out this weekend to see if it's a keeper or indeed needs to be sold for one without the safety or possibly another Glock.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Unread 11-12-09, 14:49
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,686
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishluck73 View Post
Gotcha. I've only shot mine once as I tend to practice with the G19 the most. I bought it to see how I'd like it compared to the 1911 and I agree it's not in as natural a position for me. I'm taking it out this weekend to see if it's a keeper or indeed needs to be sold for one without the safety or possibly another Glock.
IMHO, the mid-framed M&P 45 (with 4" slide) might be the best 45 CCW gun made.

I have just ordered one of these for myself.

C4
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Unread 11-12-09, 15:23
BigDog's Avatar
BigDog Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 76
iTrader: (0)
Definitely try the triggers on both models, if you can. I found the trigger on the one with the thumb safety to be gritty, while the model without (which I bought) was a heck of a lot smoother!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Unread 11-12-09, 15:36
DMR's Avatar
DMR Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northern NY
Posts: 693
iTrader: (14)
I just recieved a M&P 45 full size. My 1911 fits very well, and I'm still getting used to the M&P. Even with the small grip insert it's much larger in my hand then the 1911 with a flat back strap, manageble, but larger. I ride the safety on my 1911, but couldn't imagine doing it on a M&P 45.

IF the Kahr TP-45 I recieved at about the same time smoothes out by 400 rounds, it will get the edge over the full size M&P for CCW

Of course much more qualified opinions are availible, such as Grants.

Last edited by DMR; 11-12-09 at 15:37
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Unread 11-12-09, 15:53
decodeddiesel's Avatar
decodeddiesel Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 3,322
iTrader: (1)
I must have abnormal hands or something because I can "ride the safety" on my M&P9C and M&P45 full size no problem. I don't have large hands by any means.

My suggestion would be to try out both with and without the thumb safety and see which one you like better.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Unread 11-12-09, 16:06
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,686
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by decodeddiesel View Post
I must have abnormal hands or something because I can "ride the safety" on my M&P9C and M&P45 full size no problem. I don't have large hands by any means.

My suggestion would be to try out both with and without the thumb safety and see which one you like better.
I can ride it too (and have normal hand size). It just is not comfortable.

Ken Hackathorn (who has VERY large hands) finds the TS on the M&P to be uncomfortable as well. So it really isn't have about hand size. Its just not placed well on the gun.


C4

Last edited by C4IGrant; 11-12-09 at 16:06
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.