
 |
|
 |
| AR General Discussion General topics relating to the AR |

04-03-07, 18:21
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 76
|
|
SOCOM M4A1 14.5'' Upper builds.
Please post picture of your SOCOM upper builds? How many people have use CMMG SOCOM 14.5'' Barrels for their builds? How much does the 14.5''SOCOM Barrel weight more than a Reg. M4 14.5'' Barrel?
|

04-04-07, 11:40
|
 |
SENIOR STAFF / ADMIN
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Bragg
Posts: 2,688
|
|
|
Not exactly a precise measurement, but I know the difference between the standard LE 6920 barrel and the SOCOM HB for the same weapon is about one pound -- keeping in mind that this is in a 16" (vice 14.5") application.
Chief
|

04-04-07, 12:32
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 662
|
|
I have a CMMG M4A1 barrel. I need to snap some updated pictures, I have since added an EOTech 512, LaRue mount, Troy BUIS and Magpul enhanced trigger guard. I'll try to take more pictures tonight. The lower is an Anvil Arms (out of Lakeland, FL) They did the custom engraving at a Tampa gun show for me. It was pretty fun, I e-mailed Jon the Autobots logo and he gave it to his graphics guy who imported it to Correl and that is the end result.
|

04-04-07, 13:38
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: OK
Posts: 2,391
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Army Chief
Not exactly a precise measurement, but I know the difference between the standard LE 6920 barrel and the SOCOM HB for the same weapon is about one pound -- keeping in mind that this is in a 16" (vice 14.5") application.
Chief
|
If the profile difference is only under the handguards, the 1 pound difference should be the same regardless of 16" vs 14.5" OAL.
__________________
--Josh H.
Zombies seek out and eat brains. Don't worry; you'll be safe if they attack.
|

04-04-07, 15:33
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 458
|
|
|
Last edited by buddyhoohaw; 04-04-07 at 15:37
Reason: Additional information.
|

04-04-07, 16:07
|
 |
SENIOR STAFF / ADMIN
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Bragg
Posts: 2,688
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOKNLOD
If the profile difference is only under the handguards, the 1 pound difference should be the same regardless of 16" vs 14.5" OAL.
|
Good point! I think I had it in the back of my head that I was referencing an overall weight figure too, but obviously I failed to make any mention of that.
Even so, the practical differences between a 14.5" and 16" (weight wise) just on account of the barrel -- assuming like profiles -- are likely pretty negligible.
Chief
|

04-04-07, 17:42
|
|
Subject Matter Expert
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 917
|
|
|
The heavy barrel is a not very effective solution to a firing schedule issue(institution unamed...). Yes it takes a few more rds to heat up, but much longer to cool down.
A better way is to:
-increase surface area (flute, dimple, crinkle sandblast, or combo application)
-more effective venting through the handguards
-heatsink barrel nuts
-train on a realistic firing schedule that replicates the peaks & lulls of conflict
|

04-04-07, 23:30
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,081
|
|
Colt LE6920's with Colt 14.5" SOCOM barrels:
Semper Fi,
Jeff
|

04-06-07, 17:42
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico (USA)
Posts: 266
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by .45fmjoe
I have a CMMG M4A1 barrel. I need to snap some updated pictures, I have since added an EOTech 512, LaRue mount, Troy BUIS and Magpul enhanced trigger guard. I'll try to take more pictures tonight. The lower is an Anvil Arms (out of Lakeland, FL) They did the custom engraving at a Tampa gun show for me. It was pretty fun, I e-mailed Jon the Autobots logo and he gave it to his graphics guy who imported it to Correl and that is the end result.

|
Cool Autobot Symbol
|

04-09-07, 08:26
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 160
|
|
Here is my M4A1 SOCOM build, Colt barrel.
|

10-27-10, 23:16
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 810
|
|
|
I ran a CMMG M4A1 barrel with a KAC RAS for a while and liked the setup, I wish they still made that profile barrel because I want to do another build with a full length DD RIS II.
|

10-28-10, 12:47
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,860
|
|
|
Holy dead thread resurrection......
Franklin- BCM makes the M4A1 barrel if you want one.
__________________
Stick
I have been asked to point out that I am Magpul's photographer. I have also done work for 45 or so manufacturers within the firearm community, my work has been used for web, catalog, banners, magazines, covers, etc. I have also shot work for the US Military where it has been used in training aids. I am prior service and a full time LEO.
I also shoot and write for Military Times. My primary focus is weapons, accessories and related equipment reviews. Manufacturers can reach me through any of the boards. If you have something new, let me know.
Newest pictures uploaded here at my Flickr account
Last edited by Stickman; 10-28-10 at 12:48
|

10-28-10, 14:36
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,403
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano5326
The heavy barrel is a not very effective solution to a firing schedule issue(institution unamed...). Yes it takes a few more rds to heat up, but much longer to cool down.
A better way is to:
-increase surface area (flute, dimple, crinkle sandblast, or combo application)
-more effective venting through the handguards
-heatsink barrel nuts
-train on a realistic firing schedule that replicates the peaks & lulls of conflict
|
The above do help the rifle cool quicker but a heavier barrel still deals with heat better than a lighter one made of the same material. A lighter barrel my cool quicker but it reaches a higher temperature while dealing with the same amount of heat which leads to greater erosion.
Steel melts at the same temperature regardless of it's mass. Thinner steel needs less heat (fewer BTUs) before it reaches that temperature.
The argument that "lighter barrels cool faster" doesn't tell the whole story and is mis-leading
Last edited by MistWolf; 10-28-10 at 14:37
|

10-28-10, 16:12
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 737
|
|
There is some seriously false information posted in this thread. The weight difference between a standard Colt M4/government profile barrel and the Colt SOCOM barrel is little more than 4 ounces. Here are some actual facts on the subject matter. All weights listed below are for the stripped barrel (the barrel and barrel extension only.)
Approximate stripped weights . . .
Colt 6520/6720, 16" light-weight barrel: 1 pound, 6 ounces.
Colt 14.5" M4/government profile barrel: 1 pound, 9 ounces.
Centurion Arms 16” hammer-forged “light weight” barrel: 1 pound, 10 ounces.
Noveske 16” N4 "light" barrel: 1 pound, 12 ounces.
Colt 6920, 16" M4/governmnet profile barrel: 1 pound, 12 ounces.
Colt 14.5” SOCOM barrel: 1 pound, 13 ounces.
Noveske 16" RECON, medium contour barrel: 2 pounds, 1.6 ounces.
Colt 6721, 16" HBAR: 2 pounds, 3.4 ounces.
Standard M4/government profile versus SOCOM profile.
.....
__________________
Member of the General Population
Last edited by Molon; 11-07-10 at 18:08
|

11-01-10, 03:19
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 810
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stickman
Holy dead thread resurrection......
Franklin- BCM makes the M4A1 barrel if you want one.
|
Wow, didnt see last post was 2007 til now... I ended up buying a colt barrel, will be putting it on a 6920 with a DD RIS II and rattle canning everything.
|

11-01-10, 09:42
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Box
Posts: 142
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N.Franklin
Wow, didnt see last post was 2007 til now... I ended up buying a colt barrel, will be putting it on a 6920 with a DD RIS II and rattle canning everything.
|
I'm surprised it hasn't been consolidated into the "Ar Picture Thread" yet.......
__________________
By now your name and particulars have been fed into every laptop, desktop, mainframe and supermarket scanner that collectively make up the global information conspiracy otherwise known as "THE BEAST."
|

11-07-10, 18:09
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 737
|
|
|
Additional barrels added to post #14.
__________________
Member of the General Population
|

11-07-10, 18:22
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,939
|
|
|
Don't buy CMMG barrels. Leave them for the Arfcom Inkjet printer repairmen!!!
|

11-07-10, 19:59
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 662
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N.Franklin
Wow, didnt see last post was 2007 til now... I ended up buying a colt barrel, will be putting it on a 6920 with a DD RIS II and rattle canning everything.
|
That's going to be one heavy ass upper!
ETA - I ditched my M4A1 upper eons ago.
Last edited by .45fmjoe; 11-07-10 at 20:00
|

11-08-10, 18:44
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 32
|
|
|
I have the CMMG and im getting the BCM barreled SOCOM upper in a couple weeks.Weight increase is neglidgeable.I like a heavier barrel and this one fits the need and want.My rifles are real simple Aimpoint,BUIS and a light with standard handguards...removing the rails lightened it up and my needs for the accesories I use never required more rail space.If I want a foregrip I can always add a 2" rail to the bottom handguard.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:14.
| |