
 |
|
 |

07-12-06, 23:47
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
|
|
|
Pride Fowler Reflex sight
|

07-13-06, 02:37
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
|
|
|
Thank you for the report and great pictures.
|

07-13-06, 16:22
|
 |
Site Sponsor
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 3,119
|
|
|
neat...
(tag for later)
|

07-13-06, 22:16
|
 |
SENIOR STAFF
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,876
|
|
|
Very interesting.
It would give all the capabilities of the TA31DOC, but allow the end user to choose the ACOG model/reticule he wants.
|

07-13-06, 22:27
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VA_Dinger
Very interesting.
It would give all the capabilities of the TA31DOC, but allow the end user to choose the ACOG model/reticule he wants.
|
That is primarily the reason I went with it and the TA31F. I also think mount is better than the DOC (even if it is bulky) and the PF actually supports the sight, Doc Op is MIA except for Trijicon..
|

07-20-06, 18:00
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 2,434
|
|
|
|

07-21-06, 11:07
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
|
|
|
Nick,
I like that mount but it is going to be too tall for your Benelli. You need to get the lowest rail made for the receiver and one of the JPoint rail mounts.
|

07-21-06, 16:14
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 2,434
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nitrox
Nick,
I like that mount but it is going to be too tall for your Benelli. You need to get the lowest rail made for the receiver and one of the JPoint rail mounts.
|
Nitrox,
The LaRue mount in the picture is mounted on top of a LaRue QD 5/8" riser. The mounts will be offered in three different heights: M4 height to give a lower 1/3 co-witness when mounted directly to a flattop AR receiver, a low, and a medium (not sure on the exact heights yet). I have seen guys running Eotech's mounted directly to the rail ontop of M1014's without issues. This set-up with the lowest version of the LaRue mount should be lower than that. I'm thinking the lowest height should work pretty well, albeit somewhat of a compromise, but what isnt? I can deal with the additional height in exchange for the QD feature of the LaRue mount. If I can find a good quality, low-profile rail that can be mounted to the top of my M1 instead of the Mesa shell holder mount, I may go that route instead.
|

07-21-06, 18:12
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
|
|
|
I understand it will work in the sense that it will mount and you will be able to fire the shotgun with it. However, the rail will block the ghost rings and the PF will be higher yet. I find the ghost rings to be decent height but anything over that will be a chin weld.
|

07-21-06, 19:50
|
|
|
Thats smoking hot!!!!!! Can't wait to get one.
|

07-22-06, 00:20
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 2,434
|
|
Heres a pic of the M4 height version mounted on a M4! (Photo credit goes to MFingar)
|

07-24-06, 09:16
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 36
|
|
Here's some more pictures of the M4 Version.
I brought it to the range yesterday, and fired about 360 rounds with the mount in various positions, from the rear of the flat top, to the front and with the BUIS blade up and down positions.
At 50 & 100 yds, the dot reminded me of an M2 in performance, but in a small package. If you like the 4 MOA Aimpoint, you'll love this sight.. The BUIS, was easy to zero, and worked like a charm.
mfingar
|

07-26-06, 08:40
|
 |
Dealer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
|
|
|
Great pics (as usual) buddy!
C4
|

07-26-06, 10:00
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 36
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by C4IGrant
Great pics (as usual) buddy!
C4
|
Thanks.
That optic must look familiar
|

07-26-06, 10:13
|
 |
Dealer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mfingar
Thanks.
That optic must look familiar 
|
Yes it does!
C4
|

12-22-06, 21:44
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,040
|
|
|
|

01-05-07, 12:02
|
 |
Site Sponsor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,121
|
|
|
Are they still backordered?
|

01-05-07, 13:25
|
 |
Dealer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lumpy196
Are they still backordered?
|
PF is still out of them, but the owner did tell me that I am first on the list to get some.
I also stock the Dr optic version of this package if interested.
C4
|

01-05-07, 18:12
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,518
|
|
|
So what are the Pro's and Con's of each.
__________________
God speed Police Officer Todd Bahr.
|

01-05-07, 18:21
|
 |
Dealer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Voodoochild
So what are the Pro's and Con's of each.
|
Well, I think both are quality. So it is a win/win situation.
The RR has a glass lens and a Alum body. So does the Dr Optic. The RR has the ability to shut it off with a switch has a "constant on" feature that makes the dot as bright as possible. The Doctor doesn't have any of these features, but has a longer battery life and is a tried and true optic that has seen a lot of hard use over the years.
C4
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:38.
| |