Samson Manufacturing

Go Back   M4Carbine.net Forums > Tactical Gear > Optics & Mounts

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 07-12-06, 23:47
Nitrox's Avatar
Nitrox Offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
iTrader: (0)
Pride Fowler Reflex sight

These are gaining popularity so I thought I'd throw up some pictures. I used the sight in the iron man 3-gun match and it stood up very well. I like it as well as the J-Point and the Doc Opt plus it has a few options not available on the other two, namely the on/off switch and the top access battery door. Also the sight has a replaceable aluminum hood. The down side is that it is slightly larger.

The ACOG mount I have is a PF and I think it is too large. It offers a lot of protection but is bulky and could stand to be redesigned.


These pictures are a little dated so if anyone wants anything specific just ask.






Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 07-13-06, 02:37
Willow Drifter Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
iTrader: (0)
Thank you for the report and great pictures.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 07-13-06, 16:22
SuicideHz's Avatar
SuicideHz Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 3,119
iTrader: (2)
neat...

(tag for later)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 07-13-06, 22:16
VA_Dinger's Avatar
VA_Dinger Offline
SENIOR STAFF
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,876
iTrader: (3)
Very interesting.

It would give all the capabilities of the TA31DOC, but allow the end user to choose the ACOG model/reticule he wants.
__________________
Paul A. Hotaling
Alias Training & Security Services, LLC
Paul@aliastraining.com
757-985-9586
www.aliastraining.com

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 07-13-06, 22:27
Nitrox's Avatar
Nitrox Offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VA_Dinger
Very interesting.

It would give all the capabilities of the TA31DOC, but allow the end user to choose the ACOG model/reticule he wants.
That is primarily the reason I went with it and the TA31F. I also think mount is better than the DOC (even if it is bulky) and the PF actually supports the sight, Doc Op is MIA except for Trijicon..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 07-20-06, 18:00
nickdrak's Avatar
nickdrak Online
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 2,434
iTrader: (11)
Heres some pics of the prototype LaRue mount for the Pride Fowler sight. These pics were posted by MFingar on another site. Im thinking this sight in the LaRue mount would be perfect for my Benelli M1 S90 mounted on the new Mesa Tactical shell holder with integrated picatinny rail.


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 07-21-06, 11:07
Nitrox's Avatar
Nitrox Offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
iTrader: (0)
Nick,

I like that mount but it is going to be too tall for your Benelli. You need to get the lowest rail made for the receiver and one of the JPoint rail mounts.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 07-21-06, 16:14
nickdrak's Avatar
nickdrak Online
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 2,434
iTrader: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitrox
Nick,

I like that mount but it is going to be too tall for your Benelli. You need to get the lowest rail made for the receiver and one of the JPoint rail mounts.
Nitrox,

The LaRue mount in the picture is mounted on top of a LaRue QD 5/8" riser. The mounts will be offered in three different heights: M4 height to give a lower 1/3 co-witness when mounted directly to a flattop AR receiver, a low, and a medium (not sure on the exact heights yet). I have seen guys running Eotech's mounted directly to the rail ontop of M1014's without issues. This set-up with the lowest version of the LaRue mount should be lower than that. I'm thinking the lowest height should work pretty well, albeit somewhat of a compromise, but what isnt? I can deal with the additional height in exchange for the QD feature of the LaRue mount. If I can find a good quality, low-profile rail that can be mounted to the top of my M1 instead of the Mesa shell holder mount, I may go that route instead.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 07-21-06, 18:12
Nitrox's Avatar
Nitrox Offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
iTrader: (0)
I understand it will work in the sense that it will mount and you will be able to fire the shotgun with it. However, the rail will block the ghost rings and the PF will be higher yet. I find the ghost rings to be decent height but anything over that will be a chin weld.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 07-21-06, 19:50
Thors ~ Hammer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thats smoking hot!!!!!! Can't wait to get one.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 07-22-06, 00:20
nickdrak's Avatar
nickdrak Online
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 2,434
iTrader: (11)
Heres a pic of the M4 height version mounted on a M4! (Photo credit goes to MFingar)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 07-24-06, 09:16
mfingar's Avatar
mfingar Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 36
iTrader: (0)
Here's some more pictures of the M4 Version.

I brought it to the range yesterday, and fired about 360 rounds with the mount in various positions, from the rear of the flat top, to the front and with the BUIS blade up and down positions.

At 50 & 100 yds, the dot reminded me of an M2 in performance, but in a small package. If you like the 4 MOA Aimpoint, you'll love this sight.. The BUIS, was easy to zero, and worked like a charm.











mfingar
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 07-26-06, 08:40
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
iTrader: (27)
Great pics (as usual) buddy!


C4
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 07-26-06, 10:00
mfingar's Avatar
mfingar Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 36
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by C4IGrant
Great pics (as usual) buddy!


C4

Thanks.

That optic must look familiar
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 07-26-06, 10:13
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfingar
Thanks.

That optic must look familiar
Yes it does!


C4
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Unread 12-22-06, 21:44
Misc Ex-Member Offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,040
iTrader: (13)











Thanks LaRue Tactical, and Merry Christmas!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Unread 01-05-07, 12:02
Lumpy196's Avatar
Lumpy196 Offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,121
iTrader: (1)
Are they still backordered?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Unread 01-05-07, 13:25
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumpy196
Are they still backordered?
PF is still out of them, but the owner did tell me that I am first on the list to get some.

I also stock the Dr optic version of this package if interested.



C4
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Unread 01-05-07, 18:12
Voodoochild's Avatar
Voodoochild Online
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,518
iTrader: (2)
So what are the Pro's and Con's of each.
__________________
God speed Police Officer Todd Bahr.

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Unread 01-05-07, 18:21
C4IGrant's Avatar
C4IGrant Online
Dealer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA/OH
Posts: 23,673
iTrader: (27)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodoochild
So what are the Pro's and Con's of each.
Well, I think both are quality. So it is a win/win situation.

The RR has a glass lens and a Alum body. So does the Dr Optic. The RR has the ability to shut it off with a switch has a "constant on" feature that makes the dot as bright as possible. The Doctor doesn't have any of these features, but has a longer battery life and is a tried and true optic that has seen a lot of hard use over the years.



C4
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.