Alright gentlemen, I have been lurking here for awhile now and I decided to finally jump on-board. The Caracal came up last week in a thread involving the US importer and a dealer in France, and suffice to to say, things did not go well.
I was lucky enough to pick a gun up right around the time those threads were getting heated, and I spent the weekend trying to put together a comprehensive review that addressed a lot of the questions I had, as well as some of the things I have seen asked on this very forum (especially concerning how it stacks up to the M&P). I originally put this together for SteyrClub, but I thought it might benefit some folks to post it here as well.
I started the review by using the Steyr M9A1 as my yardstick for evaluating most aspects of the Caracal because, well, the review was originally intended for SteyrClub, and the Emirati shooter is a sort of spin-off of "the other" Austrian iron. I tried to incorporate more "mainstream" guns in the second part of my review, and some may want to just fast-forward to that part.
I have been a big fan of the Steyr M(A1) series pistols for a few years now, so when I found out the same designer had teamed up with a R&D team in the UAE to create a Steyr-like pistol, I was intrigued. This pistol has been available abroad for a couple of years now, but only recently has Caracal been working with their US importer Waffen Werks to get these guns stateside. I was lucky enough to grab one of the very first.
The first thing I noticed was the "Plasox" slide finish - every picture I had seen of the slide made it look dull and boring, but that isn't the case at all. The Plasox finish has a slight shine and has a very slick quality about it. My only concern is that it might not hold up as well to regular carry over the long haul as Tennifer or some other finishes, but we're a long way out from being able to judge.
The pistol comes in a decent hardcase and includes 3 18-round magazines, a manual, and a generic triggerlock:
Tthe magazine release is ambidextrous (button on both sides), and as I happen to shoot pistol left handed, I was curious how this feature would work out for me. It is located in a convenient spot - I have no trouble actuating the release with either thumb on the right side of the gun, or my middle finger on the left side (as I am accustomed to doing, having "grown up" around right handed guns). Still, muscle memory is hard to overcome, and I honestly see no reason to change up the way I have been doing things for years - I do not find the thumb method to be any faster than using my middle finger on the other side of the pistol, so I am going to stick to the tried-and-true middle finger method.
So how does the Caracal size up compared to the Steyr M9A1? It is a little larger, but it is very well thought-out.
I love the grip. Before getting my hands on one, I thought the grip looked somehow disproportional to the rest of the pistol in the pictures I have seen of the Caracal (a by-product of the 18 rounds stuffed inside, I suppose). But having one in front of me, it feels like Caracal made the perfect love-child of a Steyr M9A1 and a Gen 4 Glock 17. The Glocks have always struck me as a bit too fat and brick-ish, while the Steyr was always a slight bit on the skinny side; I prefer the latter when forced to choose. The Caracal is actually a slight bit thinner than the Steyr M9A1 in the rear width, but fatter when comparing the width of the pistols laid flat (running parallel to the rounds in the magazine):
This grip design is a total win for me. I used to like finger grooves so long as they conformed to my hand, but the more I shoot, the more I realize they are more prone to get in the way if you do not have a perfect grip on the firearm. Don't get me wrong - I love my Steyr, and it fits my hand like a glove - but I think Caracal nailed it with their grip. It really does seem just about perfect.
The Emiratis did not build a replaceable backstrap into this design, and that strikes me as a mistake. I'm guessing they desided to forgo this feature because of the optional shoulder stock accessory - I'm not sure they could have made both work - but I think they went the wrong direction here. Virtually all of the competitive handguns on the market these days are coming with replaceable backstraps, and I believe Caracal sales will suffer for this oversight.
The grip is a bit taller than the Steyr, and this may be a problem for concealed carry, but that report is going to have to wait until after this gun as proven itself at the range. I would like to say that the thinness of the grip may make up for height problem - we'll see. Then again, even if the F doesn't pan out for CCW, the Caracal C (compact) may just be the ticket for those guys who have trouble concealing a fullsize...
The Steyr and Caracal slides seem to be very similar:
One thing that might stand out to you in that picture is the slide release - it is much more pronounced than the Steyr (which always struck me as a bit undersized). When I hold the gun in my right hand, this slide release is in the PERFECT spot. I think it is large enough that even if you are a "high gripper" that tends to accidently trip the slide stop while shooting (causing a failure to lock on the last round), this setup should be large enough to prevent that from happening. I almost wish they had made the slide stop ambidextrous, and I guess that would be my second major complaint. But then again, I am in the habit of "power stroking" the slide to feed rounds from a fresh magazine, and I again see no reason to change up my routine.
The trigger is perfect - it is better than the Steyr, and any other polymer gun I've ever tried. It has a familiar springy and positive feel that has made the Glocks famous, but smoother and (I think) lighter. The reset is pronounced, and just about the right length. I think this is my favorite part of the Caracal, and I'm going to go into much more detail on this later.
Bookmarks