
 |
|
 |
| NFA Specifics of NFA firearms, SBR, Auto |

01-15-11, 16:48
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
|
|
|
Thinking about my first Machine Gun
So tax season is upon us, as well as my annual bonus, and I'm in the market for a machine gun, after the relatively painless process of my first suppressor. This gun will be for shooting, not a safe queen, and not an investment per se, I just want to own one, and to possibly compete with it.
I'm looking to stay below 11K for the gun itself, taxes excluded. Here's my thoughts so far:
AC556 - Plentiful, relatively cheap, and from what I've read decent machine guns, with factory support
FNC - Same price range as AC556, perhaps more military grade
AR - I've seen a few what I think are lower end M16s conversions out there for under $11K, any reason to stay away from the lower end guns? Ultimate flexibility, with many different uppers etc available for one gun.
MAC - Much cheaper, I'm a big fan of the Lage uppers from a looks standpoint, seems practical as well.
Any others I'm missing that I should consider?
Thanks!
|

01-15-11, 19:31
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town, VA
Posts: 909
|
|
|
An SMG like a Sterling will be cheaper to buy and feed and just as fun, if not more, to shoot than an M16 or other assault rifle.
The American AM180 is in 22lr, and I always though it would be a neat MG to pick up. The drums are pricey though.
The cheap way into a machine gun in an AR is the Lightning Link. Last time I looked they were going for around 7-9k. Buy a couple of uppers and a few cases of Wolf and you're still under the 11k mark.
__________________
Principles matter.
|

01-15-11, 20:22
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wesley Chapel, Florida
Posts: 42
|
|
|
M11/9 or M16
My first and only SMG is a M11/9 with Lage upper. So much you can do with it. I have the 22 conversion kit and it's bad ass. I have a cool ass suppressor for it as well. I'm in line for the Max-31 so I can use a 72 rd drum.
Having said all that if I could afford it I would go for the M16. There is no limit to what you can do with that platform as well. And you can always buy the M11 later.
You should shoot both and then decide. But remember both platforms have plenty of support and parts available. Good luck.
__________________
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
Thomas Jefferson
|

01-15-11, 20:48
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dk8019
So tax season is upon us, as well as my annual bonus, and I'm in the market for a machine gun, after the relatively painless process of my first suppressor. This gun will be for shooting, not a safe queen, and not an investment per se, I just want to own one, and to possibly compete with it.
I'm looking to stay below 11K for the gun itself, taxes excluded. Here's my thoughts so far:
AC556 - Plentiful, relatively cheap, and from what I've read decent machine guns, with factory support
FNC - Same price range as AC556, perhaps more military grade
AR - I've seen a few what I think are lower end M16s conversions out there for under $11K, any reason to stay away from the lower end guns? Ultimate flexibility, with many different uppers etc available for one gun.
MAC - Much cheaper, I'm a big fan of the Lage uppers from a looks standpoint, seems practical as well.
Any others I'm missing that I should consider?
Thanks!
|
Uzis and S&W 76s are in your price range. It is generally cheaper to shoot a SMG and more ranges accommodate them. I'd take an Uzi over a MAC every time.
AR-15 conversions are always cheaper than factory M16s. Non Colt rifles (both factory MGs and conversions) are always cheaper than factory Colt rifles. Keep in mind there are several ways to have a Title II conversion, registered receiver, drop in sear or lightning link. Things like lightning links are cheaper because they are more easily broken.
The M16 is one of the most practical select fires but your budget may not allow it.
FN FNC is a very cost effective, but parts can be scarce and expensive. AC556 might be more practical, but I haven't seen one that will perform as well as a FNC. Not really anything wrong with it, just that better guns exist.
Given your budget I'd decide if you want an assault rifle or a SMG. They are two very different things.
If you decide you want a SMG, I'd recommend a registered receiver Uzi. If you decide you want an assault rifle I'd recommend spending a little more and getting a quality Colt AR conversion or a factory 16. Prices are slightly depressed right now so it is the time to buy.
__________________
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
كافر
|

01-15-11, 21:11
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
|
|
|
Steyr,
What makes the Uzi better than a MAC with a Lage kit? I do like the looks of the Uzis for sure, but they are nearly double in price.
Thanks!
|

01-15-11, 23:03
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 107
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dk8019
Steyr,
What makes the Uzi better than a MAC with a Lage kit? I do like the looks of the Uzis for sure, but they are nearly double in price.
Thanks!
|
Uzi's used to be fare superior then the mac....until Lage came around. the double stack Uzi mags are a little easier to load and cheaper then the Recon Ordanance mags.
Having shot a far amount of various size Uzi SMG....I am perfectly happy with my Mac 11 and Mac 10.....At the last SAR show though, did see some Non-Colt RR for $8500....and if I had the cash.....with all the caliber conversion availible for M16s.......
|

01-16-11, 01:42
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 2,268
|
|
|
I would go with the Mac. They can usually be found cheap and they are still being actively catered to. I would definitely get the 9mm.
__________________
You know why nobody panic buys 30-06? Because a man with a 30-06 doesn't need to panic.
|

01-16-11, 02:57
|
 |
Industry Professional/Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: AZ-Waging jihad against crappy AR's.
Posts: 16,390
|
|
|
How about something more collectible like a Reising or MP38-MP40. I think they are close to that range?
__________________
"Change....one magazine at a time."-Me
"A firearm should be considered a fighting weapon first. Any other use should be considered a bonus." -Me
"If you won't walk out the door with a weapon you fixed, why should someone else be expected to?"-Me
Armorer Instructor for Sionics
www.semperparatusarms.com
Multiple armorer certifications
|

01-16-11, 04:35
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dk8019
Steyr,
What makes the Uzi better than a MAC with a Lage kit? I do like the looks of the Uzis for sure, but they are nearly double in price.
Thanks!
|
IMO a much stronger, more reliable SMG. Barrel changes are much simpler, parts are everywhere. The LAGE has made the MAC much more relevant than it used to be due to the optics platform and things like that.
__________________
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
كافر
|

01-17-11, 20:19
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 287
|
|
|
SMG: Swedish "K" tube or MP40 tube, Sterling or Uzi, STen, in no particular order other than price from higher to lower. All are good stuff and 9mm is relatively cheap to shoot.
Rifle: Factory Colt M16, some of the non-Colt recever guns are good, Colt reg receiver, "drop-in sear" (a misnomer but we'll go with it), and I personally would not get a lightning link. Remember most Colt reg receiver guns are large hole uppers.
Other Rifle: FNC, Ruger. The advantages the Ruger is that you still have factory support for repairs and parts. If you go the Ruger route, go blue versus stainless.
|

01-17-11, 20:45
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
|
|
|
Thanks!
Why blued instead of stainless on the Ruger?
|

01-17-11, 20:59
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 6,543
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dk8019
Thanks!
Why blued instead of stainless on the Ruger?
|
Actually more durable. Carbon steel handles the heat better.
__________________
Employee of colonialshooting.com
|

01-17-11, 21:34
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 287
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dk8019
Thanks!
Why blued instead of stainless on the Ruger?
|
Stainless steel tends to gall. Better lubricants currently available reduce that more than in the past, but I still prefer carbon. I don't particualry care for stainless barrels in full auto mode either.
|

01-18-11, 23:49
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 597
|
|
|
I would go for the AR RR. You can install a pistol caliber upper (22, 9mm, 40, 45) on it and have your subgun. Granted I like shooting some dedicated subguns more than the 9mm AR, but the versatility of the AR is what makes it the best buy in my mind. I would also consider a drop in auto sear with an MGI lower. It may be the most versatile yet.
|

01-19-11, 00:56
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 107
|
|
|
DIAS would be the Sheeeeet....if there was ever a kaboom, chances are great the DIAS would be just fine and could easily be given a new home......
|

01-23-11, 09:52
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 196
|
|
|
If you have 11 thousand to spend, get both an SMG and an assault rifle, I have an MK760 and am in the process of transfer on a AC556 folder in blue. I'm under 11k on those 2, even with the silencer for my MK760. Just a thought.
__________________
May God have mercy on my enemies, because I won't.
|

01-23-11, 14:08
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: East coast - West coast
Posts: 1,179
|
|
|
My vote is for either the registered receiver fullsize UZI or the M16. Non-colt registered receiver M16s can be found for around $9-10k right now, with some recently even going as low as $8.5k.
The M16 is just so versatile, that is my recommendation over anything else. I agree with SteyrAUG re: the UZI over the MAC. I have both and would take the UZI any day over the MAC.
|

01-24-11, 08:55
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 19
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback guys. I saw a Colt SP-1 conversion sell for 9.7K late last week, I should have jumped on that.
I think I'll just keep building up the bank account, and go with an M16 of some sort in the end. The allure is there for resell if it ever comes to it, and the flexibility is untouchable.
Are there any restrictions in regards to the uppers you can put on a registered lower?
|

01-24-11, 10:31
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 427
|
|
|
A registered machine gun is not limited in barrel length. Machine gun trumps SBR.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:21.
| |