Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: A demonstration on quality

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    4,354
    Feedback Score
    64 (98%)

    A demonstration on quality

    Almost all of us here understand the reason behind purchasing a gun from a known quality manufacturer. We know that saving 100-200 bucks right now isn't worth the headache down the road. Some of us try to warn others when the topic comes up and we hear the same old arguments. Parts is Parts, all parts come from the same place. One company is as good as another, the list goes on.

    Most of us here also know it is BS but sometimes it is hard to prove. So I submit to you these.










    These are two DPMS lowers that were part of Full lower kits a friend of mine got in at his shop. They came with LPK, stock, etc and just needed to be assembled. As you can see, both have near identical damage. Another interesting note is that the anodizing is inside the crack which of course means that these parts were damaged while still in production.

    The cracks go all the way through the Mag well and are not just "minor scratches" as one person has claimed. He has been trying to get DPMS to take these back for some time and has continued to get the run around. He finally just sold the rest of the kit and kept these lowers as a cautionary tale to others.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    961
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have just about given up fighting the "parts is parts" battle with some people locally. The ones who will point to the raw forgings that two companies use being the same spec aluminum and the end result is just how "pretty" one makes it compared to the other. Some just refuse to see anything beyond their own opinion.

    I have finally just started saying, ok...if all you want the rifle for is to be an occasional range plinker, fine, buy whatever makes you happy. But if you think there is ever a chance that the rifle might be needed to defend you or your family from something other than paper, don't you think and extra couple hundred bucks (even less in some cases) is worth it to have parts you know you can trust.

    They usually still don't get it.
    Last edited by ssracer; 05-17-11 at 13:10.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    N. Alabama
    Posts
    2,048
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    I love it how people will review something and say "the quality appears to be good." AS IF quality is something you can always see with your eyes, and AS IF quality is something that is unique to each individual item, and not a population statistic.

    Can you SEE that the parts are properly forged, hardened, machined, finished and assembled?

    In the case above, yes, that is a gross failure of the QC/QA process, that is easily visible.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    961
    Feedback Score
    0
    If I were DPMS I would be embarrassed ass hell to have those out in the world for all to see and someone in QC would be looking for a new job

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,944
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RAM Engineer View Post
    I love it how people will review something and say "the quality appears to be good." AS IF quality is something you can always see with your eyes, and AS IF quality is something that is unique to each individual item, and not a population statistic.

    Can you SEE that the parts are properly forged, hardened, machined, finished and assembled?

    In the case above, yes, that is a gross failure of the QC/QA process, that is easily visible.
    EXACTLY!!!! How many times over the years has some dipshit said how good the fit and finish are on some POS gun???
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,944
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ssracer View Post
    If I were DPMS I would be embarrassed ass hell to have those out in the world for all to see and someone in QC would be looking for a new job
    Another difference between DPMS and a Good manufacturer. You wouldn't catch Bravo or DD letting that shit be paraded all over the net. They'd make it right without a question.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,153
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    You're long standing member here with no ulterior motive that has even been discernible, so I give you full credibility at this point. That said...absolutely unbelievable.

    Maybe DMPS deserves an opportunity to explain themselves, but I can see no possible justification for what you've shown us here. Especially in this day and age.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northern MN
    Posts
    20
    Feedback Score
    0
    I actually seen pics of a DPMS mag well recently that was very wavy.

    The outfit that broaches them has issues( I can only assume that this was caused by the broaching process).

    I agree, regardless of the how or who or when, it's a QC issue all the way.

    Mike in MN
    Affiliated with RangeAR - The Range Tool Company
    Hope this makes me Legal

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Sometimes I wonder, DPMS/Bushmaster/etc are what at least appear to be larger outfits than BCM, DD, etc.

    What if DPMS just stepped up to the plate, started HPT/MPI'ing their bolts and barrels, enacting stricter QC methods and using correct milspec steel and other specs? (i.e. 5.56 chamber)

    They could still produce their low grade plinkers and low grade "match" rifles with virtually no changes and just make the "milspec" M4s off to the side. I have no reason to doubt they could easily charge less than BCM too.

    Add to that they've already got a huge fan base among the "fit and finish" crowd, almost every FFL in America is a DPMS/Bushmaster dealer, and if they really cleaned up their act they would get the milspec crowd...I don't see why they didn't start this years ago.

    Instead we get bullshit like this and batch tests that don't mean diddly.
    Why do the loudest do the least?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    What if DPMS just stepped up to the plate, started HPT/MPI'ing their bolts and barrels, enacting stricter QC methods and using correct milspec steel and other specs? (i.e. 5.56 chamber)

    They could still produce their low grade plinkers and low grade "match" rifles with virtually no changes and just make the "milspec" M4s off to the side. I have no reason to doubt they could easily charge less than BCM too.
    They won't do it because they don't have to. They have marketing and that's all they need. Every time I visit my local gun shop the owner brags how many DPMS rifles he's sold. He tried to sell me one.

    This is why I got pissed at Stag when they started offering some Custom Package BS with better manufacturing practices. If they were serious they would start making every rifle to the higher standard, especially since the price difference is apparently only $100.

    As long as people keep accepting junky quality rifles the manufacturers will happily keep making them, and any pretense of upgrading their specs will be just that: a pretense.

    I worry that as some of the other top tier manufacturers become more established that they will actually lower their quality to save a few dimes.
    Last edited by Doc Safari; 05-17-11 at 17:24.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •