
 |
|
 |
| AR General Discussion General topics relating to the AR |

10-18-07, 21:25
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,626
|
|
|
US Military's PMAG
|

10-18-07, 22:50
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,862
|
|
|
The mag looks a lot like the Sig version.
__________________
Stick
I have been asked to point out that I am Magpul's photographer. I have also done work for 45 or so manufacturers within the firearm community, my work has been used for web, catalog, banners, magazines, covers, etc. I have also shot work for the US Military where it has been used in training aids. I am prior service and a full time LEO.
I also shoot and write for Military Times. My primary focus is weapons, accessories and related equipment reviews. Manufacturers can reach me through any of the boards. If you have something new, let me know.
Newest pictures uploaded here at my Flickr account
|

10-18-07, 23:18
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N. Arizona
Posts: 175
|
|
|
It looks to me like a newer version of the Thermold mags.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
|

10-18-07, 23:46
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,626
|
|
|
I dont know if the pic is a prototype or if they just threw something in as a example.
|

10-19-07, 15:04
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 195
|
|
In September, Picatinny awarded a $98,790 contract to Ecomass Technologies for the fabrication of 550 prototype polymer magazines and the updating of the government's design drawings.
For those who want to look it up, it is contract W15QKN-07-P-0529.
I wonder how many Magpul PMAGs they could have bought for that amount?
|

10-19-07, 15:14
|
 |
Industry Professional
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montana/OCONUS
Posts: 285
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dewatters
In September, Picatinny awarded a $98,790 contract to Ecomass Technologies for the fabrication of 550 prototype polymer magazines and the updating of the government's design drawings.
For those who want to look it up, it is contract W15QKN-07-P-0529.
I wonder how many Magpul PMAGs they could have bought for that amount?
|
7056 PMAGS
|

10-19-07, 19:25
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: OH/USA
Posts: 186
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03humpalot
7056 PMAGS 
|
I'm relatively sure that if you were buying nearly $100K worth of PMags that Magpul would sell them to you a little cheaper than retail...
|

10-20-07, 09:13
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,647
|
|
|
Cool.
I will check them out. Anybody got an NSN or P/N?
|

10-20-07, 21:18
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,626
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armati
Cool.
I will check them out. Anybody got an NSN or P/N?
|
They are in development.
|

10-20-07, 22:36
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UT
Posts: 4,598
|
|
|
seems like a worthy venture. Our current mags could use some updating so they arent regarded as the weak point in the AR15/M16 design
__________________
Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
What Happened to the American dream? It came true. You're looking at it.
|

10-21-07, 17:59
|
 |
Manufacturer/Industry Professional
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 277
|
|
|
Our tax $ hard at work here.
__________________
Magpul bonehead
|

10-22-07, 00:38
|
 |
Industry Professional
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 475
|
|
Dude, what else is new? swivel chair decisions...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7KOPPER
Our tax $ hard at work here.
|
|

10-22-07, 02:08
|
 |
Manufacturer/Industry Professional
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 277
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIMPLYDYNAMIC
Dude, what else is new? swivel chair decisions... 
|
Check!
__________________
Magpul bonehead
|

10-22-07, 06:40
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fluvanna County, VA
Posts: 930
|
|
|
They will probably spend more than Magpul did developing the P-Mag and come up with something 1/2 as good.
__________________
"Something could happen."
-- Legislative aid to Virginia delegate David Toscano when I asked her why the delegate did not support the bill to allow concealed carry in restaurants, January 19, 2009
"Duh! That's why you need a gun!"
-- My 9 year old son when told what the legislative aid had said in response to my question, above.
|

10-22-07, 14:44
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,626
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmike87
They will probably spend more than Magpul did developing the P-Mag and come up with something 1/2 as good.
|
What they will prob do is spend all of the money trying to develop a magazine and than adopt the Pmag anyhow.
|

10-23-07, 11:40
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 648
|
|
Good flippin' night!! I thought we'd got past Uncle Sugar doing R&D for anything but the weapon system itself. There ain't no way they're gonna come up with anything better than the PMag. I could've sworn we understood how much more effective it is to go COTS than do R&D. Buncha DA's!
__________________
Just one of the Shepherd's sheepdogs. Joshua 24:15
|

10-23-07, 14:45
|
 |
Industry Professional/Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 6,640
|
|
This is absolutely retarded.
There is a proven item on the market, with *some*  military acceptance, and the f**king geniuses decide to reinvent the f-ing wheel anyway!?
I am constantly amazed by the blatent lunacy of the decision-makers in positions far above ther capability, and consitently under-whelmed with their product.
It just never f**king ends.
Magpul should immediately call for a congressional investigation into waste, fraud and abuse by the jerk-off that pushed this "research" forward.
F**K
__________________
Jack Leuba
Military/Government Product Liaison
Knight's Armament Company
jleuba@knightarmco.com
Director of Training
Jack@F2SConsulting.com
F2SConsulting.com | FB@ Facebook.com/F2SConsultingLLC
As accurate as needed, as fast as possible, as many times as it takes.
|

10-23-07, 15:27
|
 |
Manufacturer/Industry Professional
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 277
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Failure2Stop
This is absolutely retarded.
There is a proven item on the market, with *some*  military acceptance, and the f**king geniuses decide to reinvent the f-ing wheel anyway!?
I am constantly amazed by the blatent lunacy of the decision-makers in positions far above ther capability, and consitently under-whelmed with their product.
It just never f**king ends.
Magpul should immediately call for a congressional investigation into waste, fraud and abuse by the jerk-off that pushed this "research" forward.
F**K
|
I love how you put this. We're already on it.
__________________
Magpul bonehead
|

10-23-07, 15:51
|
 |
SENIOR STAFF
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NoVa
Posts: 2,554
|
|
|
You might want to add that PMAG's are doing well in Iraqi currently...
I'm all for funding US arms research -- but it does NOT seem wise or fair to try to reinvent the wheel - when a capable American product already exist, that has been privately funded.
|

10-23-07, 16:03
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 663
|
|
|
I guess this is another shining example of the "if we didn't invent it, it can't be any good" mentality that they so often seem to have.
Derek
__________________
An evil soul wields an evil sword.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54.
| |