Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: 22wmr vs 5.7 - doc, which is more effective?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    215
    Feedback Score
    0

    22wmr vs 5.7 - doc, which is more effective?

    22 WMR 40-grain Gold Dot Short Barrel
    vs
    5.7 FN SS197SR 40gr. Hornady V-Max Ballistic Tip

    thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    215
    Feedback Score
    0
    did i ask the wrong question?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,001
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    197 has a much greater velocity, but I've never shot anyone.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,371
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Brassfetcher has some good videos of the two rounds in gel in slow motion on youtube.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    More effective for what?

    Shooting coyotes? Both would work about the same.

    Stopping a 250lb maniac or guy armed with a gun? They both suck equally.
    Last edited by tpd223; 10-11-11 at 11:01.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,519
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tpd223 View Post
    More effective for what?

    Shooting coyotes? Both would work about the same.

    Stopping a 250lb maniac or guy armed with a gtun? They both suck equally.
    ^^^This post just made my day.

    But I spent a half hour at Brass Fetcher!

    Seriously, a buddy has both a 57 pistol and PS90.

    We might have to do a little side by side testing at the next range trip.
    Last edited by Clint; 10-11-11 at 01:00.
    Black River Tactical
    BRT OPTIMUM Hammer Forged Chrome Lined Barrels - 11.5", 12.5", 14.5", 16"
    BRT EZTUNE Preset Gas Tubes - PISTOL, CAR, MID, RIFLE
    BRT Bolt Carrier Groups M4A1, M16 CHROME
    BRT Covert Comps 5.56, 6X, 7.62

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tpd223 View Post
    More effective for what?
    This needs to be identified for any usable information flow.

    ETA:
    Doc's findings regarding 5.7 in a human target
    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=19913
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    140
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint View Post
    ^^^This post just made my day.

    But I spent a half hour at Brass Fetcher!

    Seriously, a buddy has both a 57 pistol and PS90.

    We might have to do a little side by side testing at the next range trip.
    What will you be testing on?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BufordTJustice View Post
    Brassfetcher has some good videos of the two rounds in gel in slow motion on youtube.
    Do you have a link? I don't see anything from them on the Gold Dot .22 Mag Short Barrel.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    While I like the tests being available at Brassfetcher, and they seem to do a good job, the conclusions they come to can be seriously F'd up.

    A guy on Lightfighter was pimping the "5.7 is the awesome" due to that single Brassfetcher test where they concluded in the write-up that the 5.7 was equal to a 230gr .45acp JHP in wounding ability.
    They came to this conclusion strictly from their interpretation of "kinetic energy dump", from the appearance of the temp cavities in the gel on slow-mo video.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •