Go Back   M4Carbine.net Forums > AR/M4 > AR Technical Discussion

AR Technical Discussion Dive into the details and specifications

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 11-18-11, 23:47
wild_wild_wes's Avatar
wild_wild_wes Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,707
iTrader: (5)
Polymer rails

What are your thoughts on polymer rails? They are featured on several European assault rifles, and some civillian ones have been available for a while here. Are they fit for serious use?
__________________
Remember, you can't say awesome without saying wes
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 11-19-11, 00:04
steelonsteel Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 242
iTrader: (1)
magpul uses poly rail section on thier MOE handguards, and have hed great success with it. I've nothing to complain about it there either.

Now a complete quad rail forearm i poly might be a touch weak for hard impacts and the like, but then again, maybe not - what would break those would also theoretically break plastic handguards too yes?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 11-19-11, 00:16
wild_wild_wes's Avatar
wild_wild_wes Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,707
iTrader: (5)
I meant primarily the removable rail sections.
__________________
Remember, you can't say awesome without saying wes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 11-19-11, 00:51
polydeuces's Avatar
polydeuces Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the wild beast are
Posts: 433
iTrader: (12)
No issues with "plastic" railsections, so far GTG, really love to give an all polymer rail a try if available with pedigree. No reason why it couldn't be done i think. Can you imagine the weight on that.....just thinking of it makes me warm and fuzzy inside...
__________________
The menu is never the meal.

Last edited by polydeuces; 11-19-11 at 00:59
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 11-19-11, 00:59
BCmJUnKie's Avatar
BCmJUnKie Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canon city Co. at the moment
Posts: 2,918
iTrader: (5)
Think about Glocks or M&Ps, almost any Poly. handgun is available with a rail.

I dont own any but friends do. Those things are solid.

Polymer has great compresion strength...the rail, accomodates a "Clamp" if you will.

Polymer rails = GTG
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Split66 View Post
I wouldnt listen to BCMjunkie. His brown camo clashes like hell with his surroundings. His surroundings are obviously pinkish and lacey and have big hooties.


Danger@Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/m41979/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 11-19-11, 01:10
polydeuces's Avatar
polydeuces Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the wild beast are
Posts: 433
iTrader: (12)
Cant help but wonder how long will it be before we'll see a viable all polymer rail, if at all?
It's pretty obvious we have the ability, just wondering if the material has the property to hold up. Thinking there's quite a difference between forces on a pistol frame and a (free float?) rail, more so if we consider for instance S&W frames are using metal reinforcements.
__________________
The menu is never the meal.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 11-19-11, 03:35
trinydex Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 920
iTrader: (1)
You wouldnt use an all polymer rail that had to hold zero for a front sight would you?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 11-19-11, 12:31
devinsdad Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 299
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by trinydex View Post
You wouldnt use an all polymer rail that had to hold zero for a front sight would you?
People use polymer sights for that same zero.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 11-19-11, 13:35
skyugo's Avatar
skyugo Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Collins Colorado
Posts: 2,672
iTrader: (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by trinydex View Post
You wouldnt use an all polymer rail that had to hold zero for a front sight would you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by devinsdad View Post
People use polymer sights for that same zero.

yeah probably not ideal for any kind of sighting device... though my MBUIS have impressed me with their zero holding and consistency...

for lights and stuff it's probably strong enough.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 11-19-11, 13:44
trinydex Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 920
iTrader: (1)
i guess i was referring to a full float polymer rail, just not sure how that would have the rigidity necessary at beyond fsb lengths.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 11-19-11, 14:14
a0cake's Avatar
a0cake Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,228
iTrader: (5)
A major issue that I can see is the use of VFG's. If you eat shit getting in and out of a vehicle or walking on rocks, a VFG is often the spot that takes the impact, especially if you're walking uphill. You need the rail to be stronger than the VFG connection point so that the VFG is what breaks / comes off, not the rail. If the VFG clamping system and material of construction is more robust than the rail it is mounted on, you're going to have problems.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 11-20-11, 15:27
Keesh's Avatar
Keesh Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: OR
Posts: 158
iTrader: (0)
I busted a polymer rail section on my MOE hand guards that was used for attaching a light. Aluminum is just as light and stronger so I'll be using that from now on.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 11-20-11, 22:12
polydeuces's Avatar
polydeuces Offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the wild beast are
Posts: 433
iTrader: (12)
Until someone (anyone) actually comes up w one, we won't know what it really can do, or don't.
In theory though I am sure it has it's limitations, while it's advantages would be ease of manufacturing, and weight.
__________________
The menu is never the meal.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.