PDA

View Full Version : HCS Mk18 Mod1



hydro556
05-05-12, 23:02
I am about to venture into my first NFA weapon.

Wanting a 10.5" 5.56 to start. Likely going with an AAC suppressor.

I recently bought a RECCE from Kevin at HCS. He is a phenomenal guy and built me a phenomenal carbine.

So, while I know little about, nor ever really been interested in a Mk18, I see no reason not to go this route. Besides, if I did anything else it would likely be a LaRue or Noveske, and I cant find one of those uppers in stock.

So, I am looking for thoughts on the HCS Mk18 mod1. Kevin would happily change the specs if I wanted. I wonder if the LMT barrel is the best route. Or any other changed I should consider.

Pics would be great too.

amd5007
05-05-12, 23:45
The LMT uppers are excellent. If you would want to save a little cash, the BCM 11.5" uppers are widely known to be excellent as well and that extra inch isn't much.

Just a thought, but if you're set on an as-short-as-possible set up, the AIM price for a DD mk18 upper cannot be beat.

Cameron
05-06-12, 00:54
I bought an LMT 10.5" and it has been an excellent carbine, running through thousands of rounds without any issues, and has proven to be very accurate.

That said, amd5007 is right, BCM and DD also make very nice short barreled uppers.

I really like the weapons that High Caliber Sales makes, it would be really cool to order a Mk12, Recce and Mk18 from them and have the US SOCOM trifecta.

My 10.5" LMT with DD 10" Lite rail

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7184/7146484569_fe2c5319fa_b.jpg

Cameron

hydro556
05-06-12, 09:18
I bought an LMT 10.5" and it has been an excellent carbine, running through thousands of rounds without any issues, and has proven to be very accurate.

That said, amd5007 is right, BCM and DD also make very nice short barreled uppers.

I really like the weapons that High Caliber Sales makes, it would be really cool to order a Mk12, Recce and Mk18 from them and have the US SOCOM trifecta.

My 10.5" LMT with DD 10" Lite rail

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7184/7146484569_fe2c5319fa_b.jpg

Cameron

Cameron

That is a great idea. And as much as I enjoy dealing with Kevin, and the quality I have seen so far, I may do that.

I already have his RECCE on an SR15 lower. And will likely be ordering the Mk18 Mod1 soon. Only problem is that the Mk12mod0 doesnt appeal to me very much. And to me it would seem like duplication. The RECCE does all the MK12 does in a smaller, lighter package.

A couple years ago I had a really nice, correct PRI Mk12 but sold it pretty quickly.

Looking forward to the Mk18 though, just working out details with Kevin.

Here is the Mk12 Mod0 I had. I never got around to putting the OpsInc 12th on it, although my buddy, to whom I sold it has the correct can mounted on it, it shoots great. Just wasnt for me.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v229/jmt1271/Mk12Mod0001.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v229/jmt1271/mk12.jpg

And here is the badass RECCE from Kevin. I havent been able to get past 300 yards yet, but every single group at 300 has been way under MOA. 5 shot groups, when shooting off a bipod and bench, have averaged about 2" at 300. With some at 1.5" So I am optimistic once I go to 600. Hopefully today. Also, I have not loaded any ammo for it. All rounds have been Mk262 or the Black Hills equivalent.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v229/jmt1271/weapons%20etc/2012-03-3106-17-19.jpg

Noodles
05-06-12, 10:51
Your first NFA is going to be a 10.5" suppressed??? Just letting you know now, you're likely to be disappointed. A lot of people are with very short suppressed ARs.

That setup is never going to be particularly "smooth" or even remotely quiet / hearing safe. If you've neve shot a suppressed AR, I would do so before commiting to your plans here... Or at the very least I would suggest a 308 can vs a dedicated 223.

That just seems to be a recurring theme I've been noticing.

Cameron
05-06-12, 12:25
Your first NFA is going to be a 10.5" suppressed??? Just letting you know now, you're likely to be disappointed. A lot of people are with very short suppressed ARs.

That setup is never going to be particularly "smooth" or even remotely quiet / hearing safe. If you've neve shot a suppressed AR, I would do so before commiting to your plans here... Or at the very least I would suggest a 308 can vs a dedicated 223.

How do you figure that? My first NFA item was an LMT 10.5" that runs 100% both unsuppressed and suppressed. I have yet to have a problem with it all.

It runs smoothly and is drastically quiter than without a can. In fact the 10.5" with an A2 is quieter than my 14.5" with a comp.

I think a 10.5" with a can is a great choice for a first NFA item.


Only problem is that the Mk12mod0 doesnt appeal to me very much. And to me it would seem like duplication. The RECCE does all the MK12 does in a smaller, lighter package.

That mirrors my experience. I have a 16" Recce type and bought an 18" BCM SPR, I too sold the SPR as it was just too close in performance to the Recce.

Sold the BCM SPR and kept the DD Recce
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1132/5134174023_5f8436c7e2_b.jpg

Now my two favourite carbines are my 16" Recce and 10.5" Mk18.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5217/5423199211_386f990617_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5057/5405316136_c4d9c9391a_b.jpg

Cameron

hydro556
05-06-12, 13:10
Your first NFA is going to be a 10.5" suppressed??? Just letting you know now, you're likely to be disappointed. A lot of people are with very short suppressed ARs.

That setup is never going to be particularly "smooth" or even remotely quiet / hearing safe. If you've neve shot a suppressed AR, I would do so before commiting to your plans here... Or at the very least I would suggest a 308 can vs a dedicated 223.

That just seems to be a recurring theme I've been noticing.

LOL, assume much?

I have fired quite a few suppressed weapons. From 50 bmg and 338LM bolt guns at LR, to 7.5", 10.5" and 12.5" shorty AR's.

Hell, that is what helped me decide on the 10.5". And the suppressor I am leaning toward is the AAC 7.62sd-n. Reason being, I want to be able to use it on multiple hosts. The 10.5" I intend to get next, as well as my 16" RECCE and the 300BLK SBR upper I want next.

If I had the funds and patience, I would buy a dedicated can for each host, but I dont. So I am leaning toward the AAC 7.62 for everything.

At any rate, not sure what issues you have had with 10.5's, but of all the SBR's I have shot, I like my buddys' 10.5" Noveske the best. Since I am hoping that the SBR I get first will have a shorter OAL with the can on it than my M4's are MINUS the can.

I want compact, light, reliable and quiet. That is my intention, and that is why I want the 10.5". You may have issues, but the ones I have shot have been both pleasant and accurate.

Now, back on topic. The one concern I have with the HCS Mk18 is the lack of a switchblock. I had talked myself into not worrying about it, but the more I talk with buddies who shoot suppressed short barreled guns, the more I think I want one.

I sent Kevin an email and I am going to try and determine my options. I am not sure if he has an option for a switchblock, but I think I want one. Any opinions on this guys?

hydro556
05-06-12, 13:15
How do you figure that? My first NFA item was an LMT 10.5" that runs 100% both unsuppressed and suppressed. I have yet to have a problem with it all.

It runs smoothly and is drastically quiter than without a can. In fact the 10.5" with an A2 is quieter than my 14.5" with a comp.

I think a 10.5" with a can is a great choice for a first NFA item.



That mirrors my experience. I have a 16" Recce type and bought an 18" BCM SPR, I too sold the SPR as it was just too close in performance to the Recce.

Sold the BCM SPR and kept the DD Recce
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1132/5134174023_5f8436c7e2_b.jpg

Now my two favourite carbines are my 16" Recce and 10.5" Mk18.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5217/5423199211_386f990617_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5057/5405316136_c4d9c9391a_b.jpg

Cameron

Cameron, those are some badass looking weapons, and it looks like you and I are on the same path.

I absolutely love the way both your RECCE and (especially) the MK18 look.

That is exactly like I want mine to look. I have one concern (other than the lack of a switchblock, as far as I know) and that is the UBR stock. Probably a tie for me between the LMT Sopmod and the Magpul UBR stocks as my all time favorite.

I am concerned the UBR may be a little heavy for this project because I want light as possible. Do you need the UBR for balance on the Mk18 or do you just like the UBR? (Who wouldnt, they are beautiful but built like tanks)

Also, I assume you do not have a switchblock? How is that working out for you shooting suppressed? A lot of blowback?

Cameron
05-06-12, 13:49
While the Magpul UBR is not the lightest stock available I find it balances my SBR well. The LMT has quite a heavy barrel profile, couple that with a longer rail and especially a can, I find that the UBR balances things quite nicely, but stocks are personal preference...

My LMT does not have a switch block and there is more gas coming back when suppressed, but not something that has caused me to even go so far as to install a gas busting charging handle. I might get on for the new BCM Gunfighter charging handles that are designed to block gas.

Cameron

hydro556
05-06-12, 14:14
While the Magpul UBR is not the lightest stock available I find it balances my SBR well. The LMT has quite a heavy barrel profile, couple that with a longer rail and especially a can, I find that the UBR balances things quite nicely, but stocks are personal preference...

My LMT does not have a switch block and there is more gas coming back when suppressed, but not something that has caused me to even go so far as to install a gas busting charging handle. I might get on for the new BCM Gunfighter charging handles that are designed to block gas.

Cameron

Sounds reasonable. I am likely going to roll with what I have to start, and if I need to balance with something heavier, I will.

Noodles
05-06-12, 15:41
I want ... quiet. ... I want the 10.5".

Ok boss. Well good luck because that has not been my experience with 10" ARs.

Fwiw, I see 11.5" as so far superior to 10.5" that I'll offer you that as a recommendation, but I know the Mk18 is 10 so that's probably what you're going to go with. Enjoy it!

Cameron
05-06-12, 15:57
Fwiw, I see 11.5" as so far superior to 10.5" that I'll offer you that as a recommendation

Which 11.5" and can are you running?

hydro556
05-06-12, 17:26
Ok boss. Well good luck because that has not been my experience with 10" ARs.

Fwiw, I see 11.5" as so far superior to 10.5" that I'll offer you that as a recommendation, but I know the Mk18 is 10 so that's probably what you're going to go with. Enjoy it!

Are you familiar with the concept of relativity?

Yes, I want quiet, and I want short, leaning toward 10.5. Having shot both 10.5and 12", both with the same can. Not much difference.

Both were quiet,but relative to a suppressed long barrel rimfire they were loud as hell. Relatively. So I expect quiet
and short. Relax man. This is supposed to be fun.

ETA- and I appreciate your recommendation on the 11.5. I am considering options and have a long wait to figure it all out. That is why I am asking questions. Having read the dwell time comments, I can see the importance an extra inch, or even 2,of barrel can make. All options open.

Noodles
05-06-12, 18:16
Which 11.5" and can are you running?

12.5" with a Ranger2

I have an SR7 on order, but AAC can't seem to get their shit together enough to ship them! I would have gone with a 11.5" but I'm already planning a 9" 300blk, so it seemed to make sense to me to have small, medium, and large sizes, the 12.5" being a nice medium. To that point, I had a 13.7" midlength.... Can not recommend that either.

For dwell time, internal pressures and wear, terminal ballistics, etc I think 11.5-12.5" is the shortest I'd go in an AR. Any shorter and I think 300blk or 6.8 make more sense.

I did some highspeed full auto testing for a small mfg a couple weeks back... I was not impressed by any 10.5" there compared to my 12.5". Maybe they were different, but it really seems 10.5" is noticeably more violent than 12.5". The round is designed for a 20" barrel, I'm more than happy to comprise if all it means is 2" oal and an insignificant extra amount of weight.

Cameron
05-06-12, 22:13
I know I have said it before in the thread, that my 10.5" runs without issue. I think the compromise is that for a shorter package you will have more blast, more noise, less velocity and a requirement for more gas. That is just the reality. Is the 11.5" less of a compromise, yes but them the 12.5 is even more so and for that matter the 14.5" makes a lot of sense, and then if you are going 14.5" you may as well get the 16"....

If we keep trying to mitigate the compromises than we would probably end up with a 20" with rifle length gas system.

The reality is that a correctly made 10.5" will be 100% reliable, but will certainly wear faster and create more noise/gas/blast etc. It's my opinion that the benefits of the short 10.5" length out way the costs.

Cameron

Iraqgunz
05-07-12, 02:36
Why don't you tell us more about your SBR's? I have a feeling there is more to the story. Not one of my SBR's nor the ones I have built for others has yet to have a malfunction.

This includes thousands of rounds suppressed and unsuppressed through my own, multiple magazine types and various types of ammo.


12.5" with a Ranger2

I have an SR7 on order, but AAC can't seem to get their shit together enough to ship them! I would have gone with a 11.5" but I'm already planning a 9" 300blk, so it seemed to make sense to me to have small, medium, and large sizes, the 12.5" being a nice medium. To that point, I had a 13.7" midlength.... Can not recommend that either.

For dwell time, internal pressures and wear, terminal ballistics, etc I think 11.5-12.5" is the shortest I'd go in an AR. Any shorter and I think 300blk or 6.8 make more sense.

I did some highspeed full auto testing for a small mfg a couple weeks back... I was not impressed by any 10.5" there compared to my 12.5". Maybe they were different, but it really seems 10.5" is noticeably more violent than 12.5". The round is designed for a 20" barrel, I'm more than happy to comprise if all it means is 2" oal and an insignificant extra amount of weight.

Noodles
05-09-12, 13:57
Not one of my SBR's nor the ones I have built for others has yet to have a malfunction.


Oh? That's so amazing it's unbelievable.

Iraqgunz
05-09-12, 14:37
Well believe it. My 11.5" SBR with can just over 2100 rounds in 3 days during the Magupl Dynamics Carbine II Course= ZERO issues.

All the previous shooting with it= ZERO issues.

12.5" SBR Magpul Dynamics Carbine Course= ZERO issues.

I don't use shitty parts, I understand how the system works and I have tailored my weapons to run. I also don't use clown shoes ammunition.

The other SBR's that I have put together for various personnel have yet to have any issues.

Why don't you elaborate more on your particular SBR's? Make, model, etc...


Oh? That's so amazing it's unbelievable.

RD62
05-09-12, 15:04
I too have had zero issues over many thousands of round
s with my properly lubed and maintained LMT 10.5".

I apologize I do not have an exact round count immediately at hand.

Cameron
05-09-12, 16:04
Oh? That's so amazing it's unbelievable.

I just don't get it. If I use widget X and have a problem, I don't immediately assume that everybody that uses widget X also has the same problem. People tend to use weird emotion based reasoning when it comes to firearms...

Here is an SBR and it's the "horrifyingly unreliable on the internet" 10.5" barrel to boot, after shooting approx 3,000-4,000 rounds without being cleaned. I shot a mixture of surplus M855, commercial Federal .223, and Hornady steel cased ammo, and took a 3 day class with Magpul Dynamics.

Amazingly it has never had a failure of any kind to feed, fire or eject. It still has never had a failure that was not attributable to bad ammo or bad magazines.
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4130/5092488006_e78258d544_b.jpg

The reality is that an established firearm like the AR15, Mk18, 1911 etc all work perfectly well when they have been built correctly.

Cameron

Noodles
05-09-12, 16:12
Are those 10.5" unreliable comments directed at me? Where did I ever say anything about 10.5 reliability? Please show me.

I said they are violent and loud. I did some testing with 3 different 10.5" setups, full auto, semi, and both under highspeed camera... I wasn't impressed with what I saw on cyclic rate, and general feel of them. None of them were what I would personally want. I told the OP my opinion, if he wants a 10.5, go for it! I've shot 7.5", 10.5" 11.5" 12.5" 13.7" 14.5" 16" 18" 20" and 24", of those I wouldn't get anything longer than 16 personally or shorter than 11.5", those opinions have nothing to do with reliability so I'm not sure where that came from.

10.5 is not for me. I have a 12.5 DD barrel on my SBR that I'm digging quite a bit right now. Also newly running the A5 kit to test is out, won't have any comments about it until I get a chance to highspeed that, looking forward to it.

Do as you please, and god forbid anyone offer free advice you don't agree with.

Oh that said, 10.5 looks bad ass.

Iraqgunz
05-09-12, 17:10
I am still waiting for you to SPEC OUT your various SBR's for us. I believe that IIRC you are using some type of adjustable gas block. I can all but guarantee that it is part of your problem based on what I saw recently with one.


Are those 10.5" unreliable comments directed at? Where did I ever say anything about 10.5 reliability? Please show me.

I said they are violent and loud. I did some testing with 3 different 10.5" setups, full auto, semi, and both under highspeed camera... I wasn't impressed with what I saw on cyclic rate, and general feel of them. None of them were what I would personally want. I told the OP my opinion, if he wants a 10.5, go for it! I've shot 7.5", 10.5" 11.5" 12.5" 13.7" 14.5" 16" 18" 20" and 24", of those I wouldn't get anything longer than 16 personally or shorter than 11.5", those opinions have nothing to do with reliability so I'm not sure where that came from.

10.5 is not for me. I have a 12.5 DD barrel on my SBR that I'm digging quite a bit right now. Also newly running the A5 kit to test is out, won't have any comments about it until I get a chance to highspeed that, looking forward to it.

Do as you please, and god forbid anyone offer free advice you don't agree with.

Oh that said, 10.5 looks bad ass.

Noodles
05-09-12, 17:19
I am still waiting for you to SPEC OUT your various SBR's for us. I believe that IIRC you are using some type of adjustable gas block. I can all but guarantee that it is part of your problem based on what I saw recently with one.

Nope. I don't own an adjustable right now. I've used the switchblock and LaRue's PST before and I'm considering that W.A.R receiver but my SBR currently does not have anything but the pinned DD lo-pro. I tested a switchblock and posted the results in another thread, those are fantastic at what they do, the rail options are a killer though.

What problem do I have exactly? What are you even on about? Where do I say I have any sort of problem? I think 10.5 looks cool as shit but only has practical disadvantages over 11-12", that's the opinion I offered.

I full auto tested 3 differently built but overall similar (well, two were really really similar) 10.5"s a few weeks ago with a photron highspeed. Didn't like them. There was noticeable gas in the face suppressed after 5 rounds full auto, they didn't "FEEL" as nice to me (something you're a proponent of iirc), and I thought unsuppressed they were excessively loud, granted this was indoors but the 14.5" we used was much more pleasant. I wish I would have had my 12.5" running at the time, was waiting on the A5 kit to come in.

Anyhow this is all off topic to the OP, if you like you can start another thread about 10.5 opinions or better yet PM me and discuss it there. But I'm done getting drawn in to a thread hijack.

Noodles
05-09-12, 17:23
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4130/5092488006_e78258d544_b.jpg


I should have specified THIS 10.5" looks bad ass. I'd run that setup if it could still work in a suppressor heartbeat although I would go with the 11.5" version of that.

Iraqgunz
05-09-12, 18:14
Go back and read some of your posts. You essentially stated that in your experience the 10.5" wasn't reliable and that you had issues with (or wouldn't recommend a 12.5" or 13.7" middy? (whatever that is) which means you either experienced issues or you didn't.


Nope. I don't own an adjustable right now. I've used the switchblock and LaRue's PST before and I'm considering that W.A.R receiver but my SBR currently does not have anything but the pinned DD lo-pro. I tested a switchblock and posted the results in another thread, those are fantastic at what they do, the rail options are a killer though.

What problem do I have exactly? What are you even on about? Where do I say I have any sort of problem? I think 10.5 looks cool as shit but only has practical disadvantages over 11-12", that's the opinion I offered.

I full auto tested 3 differently built but overall similar (well, two were really really similar) 10.5"s a few weeks ago with a photron highspeed. Didn't like them. There was noticeable gas in the face suppressed after 5 rounds full auto, they didn't "FEEL" as nice to me (something you're a proponent of iirc), and I thought unsuppressed they were excessively loud, granted this was indoors but the 14.5" we used was much more pleasant. I wish I would have had my 12.5" running at the time, was waiting on the A5 kit to come in.

Anyhow this is all off topic to the OP, if you like you can start another thread about 10.5 opinions or better yet PM me and discuss it there. But I'm done getting drawn in to a thread hijack.

Noodles
05-09-12, 18:30
I have never said all 10.5" weren't reliable, just some I used. And in this thread 10.5" reliability good or bad was mentioned by everyone BUT me.

No, I would not recommend a 13.7 or 12.5 middy to anyone for any reason. I had the 13.7", it worked but not great for a variety of reasons. Ragged edge of correct dwell and pressures for midlength gas system.

PM if you need anything else ya?

JoshNC
05-09-12, 21:35
I've also had extremely reliable function with my LMT 10.5 inch upper. Suppressed, unsuppressed, semiauto and fullauto that sucker just RUNS provided you keep it well lubed. Mine is very smooth and is very comfortable to shoot unsuppressed if outdoors. My upper has a very conservative 3k rounds down the pipe, most of which has been with a suppressor and fullauto.

I used to have my LMT set up with a KAC RAS-II, but converted it to a Mk18 with a DD RIS-2 FDE rail. I liked that one so much that I eventually built up a Noveske N4 Mk18 upper with a black RIS-2 rail. Never fired the N4.

You really can't go wrong with LMT, Noveske, DD, or BCM. And I am a big fan of the Mk18 RIS-2 rail. It is the perfect length for me.

As for suppressors, I own an SWR Specwar-2 and an AAC 51 tooth M4-2000. I got the AAC for a song and while I like it, I would prefer a Surefire if I had it to do all over again. Not that AAC doesn't make a great can, just that after using both I like Surefire's mounting/locking system better.

Cameron
05-10-12, 09:51
I used to have my LMT set up with a KAC RAS-II, but converted it to a Mk18 with a DD RIS-2 FDE rail. I liked that one so much that I eventually built up a Noveske N4 Mk18 upper with a black RIS-2 rail. Never fired the N4.

You really can't go wrong with LMT, Noveske, DD, or BCM. And I am a big fan of the Mk18 RIS-2 rail. It is the perfect length for me.

As for suppressors, I own an SWR Specwar-2 and an AAC 51 tooth M4-2000. I got the AAC for a song and while I like it, I would prefer a Surefire if I had it to do all over again. Not that AAC doesn't make a great can, just that after using both I like Surefire's mounting/locking system better.

Thanks for the info. Do you have a photo of your LMT 10.5" with the Mk18 RIS-2 Rail and a can mounted? I am in the throws of trying to figure out how to mount a can on mine, with the 10.5" barrel and 10" rail (https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=105067)

Cameron

davidjinks
05-10-12, 11:18
OP

I've had 1 complete rifle (MK12 MOD1) and 2 complete uppers built by HCS. The latest one being a MK18 MOD1 (Waiting to get home to see the damn thing!!!).

Kevin and Alan do some damn amazing work!

With that being said, my first SBR was a 10.5" (Built by ADCO). This was an upper from a Colt LE6920 that was cut to 10.5". At the start I did have cycling issues. After trouble shooting and some great help from some people here, it turned out to be a gas issue. I sent the upper back to ADCO (Another good company to get work done) and had them open the GP up to .071. That cured all the problems. Prior to openig the GP (Per my request) I asked to have the GP measured. The reported measurement was .058.

ICANHITHIMMAN
05-10-12, 11:48
Man you guys go me thinking back I need to move so I can own one myself. Old pic cause you got me remembering shit.
http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn119/ICANHITHIMMAN/Picture594.jpg
http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn119/ICANHITHIMMAN/40295_1371129886497_1479256162_30886171_1599641_n.jpg

JoshNC
05-11-12, 17:58
Thanks for the info. Do you have a photo of your LMT 10.5" with the Mk18 RIS-2 Rail and a can mounted? I am in the throws of trying to figure out how to mount a can on mine, with the 10.5" barrel and 10" rail (https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=105067)

Cameron


Not with the can mounted. Give me a few days and I can post a few. It cuts it very close with the Mk18 rail, which I think is 9.5 inches.