PDA

View Full Version : 1911 Mags Part Deux/ Tripp and Wilson Comparrison



toddackerman
01-09-08, 18:13
Instead of adding more to Grant's thread, I wanted to start another regarding 2 very well known, and excellent quality 1911 Mags. The Tripp GenII Cobra, and the Wilson ETM.

After 30 years behind the 1911, I can;t think of a Mag that I haven't used including several Hybrids (mix and match tubes, followers springs etc.) but I am totally blown away by the new GenII Tripp Research Cobra Mag., and the Wilson ETM. That being said, here are some things I have learned after some preliminary testing, with some very detailed testing including spring weight tension measurement etc. to come.

First, both Mags. have excellent tubes, and I think either is worthy of hard carry, and firing use. The wall thickness on both Mags. is .025 thick. Both companies state that they have changed their tube material to help alleviate "Lip Spread" and Cracking. The Tripp Mag. has less metal removed from the tube sides for visual inspection of rounds, and I don't know if this will make the tube stronger over time, but more metal would at least appear to add more strength in theory. In the past, Wilson has suffered from "Lip Spread" and Tripp has suffered from cracks.

Both Mags. have quality springs, but the Tripp's are .048" thick Heat Treated Chrome Silicon. The Wilson is .045" thick Stainless Steel. There are benefits to both, but the Tripp Spring is very "Robust". Both have 14 coils. I will be testing the spring tension on both Mags. extensively when I receive a Digital Compression tester in the next week or so. I'm interested in spring pressure when the Mag is brand new, when it has been loaded for a week or so, with one round in it, all the way to 8 rounds. Should prove interesting. The critical issue is having enough spring tension on the last round to keep control of it.

The base plates on both Mags are excellent designs, and very similar as far as Height, Width, and Length. Both will easily seat a Mag in an extended Mag Well without having to get thicker plates. Both also have convenient marking methods. Wilson uses the numerals from 1-10, and Tripp uses 1-9 "Dots"(Like Domino's) on the bottom. All you do is highlight the number or dots with a little Model Paint on a toothpick to keep track of what Mag you are using, rotated in or out of your carry system, or has given you a problem. Much better IMO than the labels we have used over the years.

Now to the follower...

Tripp clearly wins this section hands down IMO. Their follower is thicker, deeper, and has a metal engagement surface on the front that actuates the slide lock. Wilson has fought this problem for 27 years, and they have still opted to use just a Nylon follower without reinforcements.

I have tested both in live fire and both feed and eject reliably which I would expect. I did have issues with Wilson's followers engaging the slide stop before chambering the last round on 4 different ETM's, which I am still playing with. Wilson said I'm the only report of a problem they've had. (Go figure.)

It could be a slide stop issue, a spring issue, or a follower issue, so I am replacing all of these and working with combinations to see what surfaces. All I know is that my gun runs every other Mag in my collection. The Tripp Mag ran perfectly, but I only had time to out 100 rounds on it in a snow storm before calling it quits today.

I'd post Pics, but the websites do more justice to these Mags.

http://www.trippresearch.com/osdoc/1911mag.html

http://www.wilsoncombat.com/a_magazines_ETM.asp

David Thomas
01-09-08, 22:47
Thanks for the write up.

I guess I will add some of my poor quality pics and my opinion:

Old style (GEN I) Tripp magazine and the New Wilson ETM:

The Tripp's method of baseplate retention on the left seems more robust.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/TrippvsWilson010.jpg


Tripp on the left with the odd witness holes. Wilson ETM on the right
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/TrippvsWilson008.jpg

Bad pic of the portion of the follower that makes contact with the slide stop:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/TrippvsWilson006.jpg


Dirty Tripp follower vs. new and cleaner Wilson ETM:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/TrippvsWilson002.jpg

I will be ordering some of the Gen II Tripp Magazines tomorrow for testing.
I think both magazines will prove themselves to be the best of the best. if forced to chose between the two, I would keep my Tripp magazines as I have more experience with them and they have some theoretical advantages such as the metal insert in the follower and the more robust baseplate retention.

RD62
01-10-08, 14:41
Thanks for the write-up! I'm gonna pick-up some of the new Wilson mag's to try myself.

-RD62

David Thomas
01-17-08, 21:22
My new Gen II Tripp Cobra mags came in today.
The Gen I and Gen II Cobra's appear to have the same baseplate and follower.

From left to right: GEN II Cobra, GEN I Cobra, Wilson ETM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/CobraGenII002.jpg

From left to right: GEN II Cobra, GEN I Cobra, Wilson ETM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/CobraGenII008.jpg

From left to right: GEN II Cobra, GEN I Cobra, Wilson ETM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/CobraGenII013.jpg

Gen II Cobra
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/CobraGenII014.jpg

Gen II Cobra
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/CobraGenII022.jpg


Wilson ETM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/CobraGenII031.jpg

David Thomas
01-17-08, 21:55
Gen II Tripp Cobra:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/cobraguts009.jpg

Gen II Tripp Cobra follower:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/cobraguts012.jpg


Gen I Tripp Cobra:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/cobraguts016.jpg

Wilson ETM:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/DavidThomas/cobraguts004.jpg


I will be giving my old CMC and Wilson mags a break and will be trying these new mags out for a while.

Rinspeed
01-18-08, 10:07
Thanks for the nice write up. Not sure how feasible it would be for you but I think it would be very interesting to see how much spring degradation there would be after leaving both mags loaded for six months or so. Just out of curiosity do you have a link for the digital compression tester.

toddackerman
01-19-08, 08:17
Thanks for the nice write up. Not sure how feasible it would be for you but I think it would be very interesting to see how much spring degradation there would be after leaving both mags loaded for six months or so. Just out of curiosity do you have a link for the digital compression tester.

I'll be testing over time. As I understand it, once the spring has taken a set, it pretty much stays there. It's the USAGE that deteriorates the tension. At least that's what companies like Wolff have always said, and still do on their site.

I don't have a link to the tester.