Remington 700 AAC-SD range report, decent i guess [Archive]

View Full Version : Remington 700 AAC-SD range report, decent i guess

abanks8245

05-13-12, 19:35

This is my second attempt at a semi precision bolt gun, first the specs:

Remington 700 AAC-SD
20 inch barrel
308 win
HS precision stock( PSS takeoff)
Vortex 2.5-10 EBR1/MOA reticle, pretty impressive!!!!
Harris Bi-pod 6-9
Ammo: FGMM 175 grain SMK

First time shooting it with new stock, the hogue stock was ok, but i cant stand the feel of the over mold material, could not find my ruler and have not purchased a caliber, will buy one soon though. Overall the gun shot well, i really maybe considering a AICS 1.5 , because i really like the idea of magazine fed for sheer speed but that further down the road as well as NF 5.5-22 . Since i could not find ruler, tape measure etc, i used something even simpler a quarter, now im no sniper but i, like others, am intrigued at the idea of putting rounds on target accurately at distance 100-600 yard for me, for now, maybe further out as skill and equipment develop more. So considering this a average group i assume? , are others with similar builds getting better or worst groups, im an average shooter, just trying to get deeper into the sport/ maybe f class/tactical rifle matches in the future. Sorry for crappy phone pics, and thanks in advance for the feedback

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk39/datruthab123/IMG00287-20120513-1653.jpg

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk39/datruthab123/IMG00283-20120513-1639.jpg

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk39/datruthab123/IMG00285-20120513-1639.jpg

FromMyColdDeadHand

05-14-12, 00:11

I just picked one up and put it in a AICS 2.0. I haven't had a chance to shoot it yet- hoping to get out this week sometime and work it up. Seems like a nice gun, can't wait till the action and trigger work themselves in a bit.

Pappabear

05-14-12, 02:12

Nicely done. Can't beat that gun for the money. And it can grow up with you.

C-grunt

05-14-12, 12:43

Id say thats good shooting. Measuring with my Mk1 eyeball Id say thats right about an inch grouping there with factory ammo. Get into reloading and find a load your gun really likes and it could get better.

ccrn_csc

05-14-12, 17:02

Did I miss the distance in the post somewhere?

jdodd

05-14-12, 21:06

Still have the factory trigger? Is the stock bedded? My 700 aac-sd in a h&s w/ Timney 510 shoots .5 moa or better with swa 175 smk.

abanks8245

05-14-12, 22:41

distance: 100 yards
here is my group me checking it at work with a caliper, i think im measuring correctly? what you think
http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk39/datruthab123/IMG00288-20120514-1401.jpg

orkan

05-14-12, 23:46

You measure the widest point, then subtract the bullet diameter. (.308)

abanks8245

05-15-12, 00:14

and just subtract the bullet diameter

orkan

05-15-12, 02:23

darr3239

05-15-12, 03:22

Quick and dirty is measuring from the center of the two holes, that are the farthest apart. That new caliper makes it pretty easy. With a group that has holes over one another, it becomes a little more complicated in finding the true center of the holes. Then Orkan's method is the best. Come to think of it, I'm over thinking, and using just one method all the time is best........Orkan's.

abanks8245

05-15-12, 09:16

English... please speak it.

Are you trying to tell me that the target is being measured correctly, or are you trying to ask me how to correctly measure the target?

You can't have it both ways. Capitalization, punctuation, and taking the time to type your entire question/statement would sure go a long way toward informing me what the hell it is you are trying to ask or say.

Use this. (http://www.ontargetshooting.com/download.html) Maybe it will help.
... or maybe it will further damage your communication skills. :suicide:

I am asking if the position of caliper prongs are correct?If they are not, where should the prongs be placed. If I am asking/ or wording my statement wrong, my apologies. Lets not get to serious on my communication skills, that never been an issue. Lets keep it involving my target and range report , thanks for the help.

orkan

05-15-12, 11:13

is teh kaleeper on teh outsyde edge of teh boolet wholes dat r teh fartheest apawt >> Jes // Den jew must be doeen eet write

MCS

05-15-12, 11:29

I have been really considering the aac as a base to a precision rifle.

jdodd

05-15-12, 11:51

I have been really considering the aac as a base to a precision rifle.

I would say thats a good choice, check out snipers hide. A lot of members (including myself) started and still use the aac-sd.

abanks8245

05-15-12, 12:00

is teh kaleeper on teh outsyde edge of teh boolet wholes dat r teh fartheest apawt >> Jes // Den jew must be doeen eet write

thanks for your special brand of help! Im tracking now the Remington AAC SD is proving to be a very good starter platform, so far.

FromMyColdDeadHand

05-22-12, 17:57

orkan

05-22-12, 18:20

I have seen as much as 75fps difference in velocity between these rifles... so his dope may hurt you more than it helps.

If you have a velocity at least... then any number of free ballistic calculators on the net can help you get close.

abanks8245

05-24-12, 22:48

I got mine out and zero'd it, but a 20+mph wind and a lack of time stopped me from getting dope for longer shots. Have you shot yours past 100? Any chance you can help a brother out with some dope :D since I'm shooting in a match this weekend and I won't have time to work it up myself. I've found some stuff online, but it would be nice to have the data from the same model rifle.

Thanks

I have to begin developing my own data book as well,:D. I did use the on target program, orkan, just inside of an inch, thanks for the heads up. hope the match and gun works out for you FromMyColdDeadHand , great gun so far.Just getting into the precision rifle sport as well. Any advice on building first data book, practice drills etc.

abanks8245

07-03-12, 23:31

I had a chance to get a AICS, which i wanted initially but price held me back, for my 700 AAC-SD so i jumped at the opportunity when i got one for a outstanding price from a buddy. The gun is considerably heavier but very comfortable. I also got a chance to use and hopefully keep:D the Vortex Razor HD 5-20x50. I have handled some nice Nightforces, S&B , and a USO , the glass on the Vortex HD is amazing. I am just really getting my feet wet in bolt guns, and high end optics but Vortex is really stepping up to the plate. I am blown away on clarity of this scope, even though i am learning there is more to quality optics then Clarity, but it really helps. I have not had a chance to test tracking and adjustments, want to get better trained on properly using this scope, considering i am still a novice. I plan on competing in several F class/ Tactical rifle matches in area soon. I have found a amazing set up with the AICS and Vortex razor HD , i think this gun is official done.
Here is gun at range today after getting zeroed, and group shot at 100 yards

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk39/datruthab123/IMG00329-20120703-2001.jpg

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk39/datruthab123/IMG00331-20120703-2007.jpg decent 3 shot group i figure

zx2man

07-05-12, 20:53

SeriousStudent

07-05-12, 21:48

Very respectable group with off the shelf factory ammo, I am quite sure if you can create some loads to your specific rifle, it will get better. Most remington 700 308s use a 1/12 twist. Try some 168's which are perfect for that rate. Good luck :)

I am just curious. Are you referring to the OP's rifle?

I own a Remington 700 AAC-SD in .308, and the factory barrel is a 1/10 twist. I use 175 GMM.

I'm not starting a fight or anything. Just curious what you mean. Thanks.

swedeboy

07-13-12, 02:34

That is a very respectable group. I picked one up a few months ago but haven't had time to get to the range. I'm glad to see that a tight group is attainable.

JDM3377

07-29-12, 04:48

is teh kaleeper on teh outsyde edge of teh boolet wholes dat r teh fartheest apawt >> Jes // Den jew must be doeen eet write

:laugh::agree: I love this forum...

VooDoo6Actual

07-29-12, 15:40

English... please speak it.

You do realize your asking a lot with those standards so high....

taliv

07-29-12, 20:36

heh, it's not often you see someone asserting his communication skills aren't an issue with back-to-back comma splices. :)

but back on topic... i'd be curious to see additional range reports on this rifle

abanks8245

08-02-12, 02:39

:laugh::agree: I love this forum...

You do realize your asking a lot with those standards so high....

My posts on this forum, the few that I have, are for I guess you can call it my small contribution to a steady passing of information/opinions on this site, just trying to give back, and contribute. Upon reading my post, it was slightly assed up, and for that I will type a little more clearly and concisely. Message received

orkan

08-02-12, 09:41

Message received I'm glad.

You don't get points for "passing information" if the information is wrong or not organized properly.

abanks8245

08-02-12, 11:18

I'm glad.

You don't get points for "passing information" if the information is wrong or not organized properly.

Right you are! Good copy

BruceLeroy

09-28-12, 19:09

Not bad. I know my AAC shoots ok at 100-200 but really starts to shine at 300 (fartyherst shot yet). I shoot 178 BTHP from Hornady in front of some RL15 powder in LC brass. My rifle LOVES it. I have averaged all of my shot groups at different ranges and keep adjusting accordingly... My 300 avg. group so far is 1.75". I never would have thought I could do this but it just feels right.

sheep_dog_gunner

10-08-12, 16:40

I don't have any pics, (old computer took a dump), but with an Rem 700 AAC, Bell and Carlson Tactical Medalist Style 2, Leupold Mark 4 Rings, Leupold Mark 4 Base, and a Trijicon Tr22-2G, I was able to shoot .75" Groups at 100m. I was shooting in the prone position, using my backpack as a rest. I am very new to the whole "precision shooting" world, but I think this is pretty darn good. I was using Federal 168gr, BTHP Match ammo. I would like to try shooting 300-500 meters, but simply do not have access to such lengths. Anyone here have a experience with this rifle at longer distances?

jesuvuah

10-08-12, 18:53

It looks like a pretty good group to me.

ASH556

10-09-12, 08:49

The rifle isn't shooting badly, but I believe it should do better; at least mine did. Technically, mine was an SPS Tactical, not an AAC, but I had it in an HS Precision LTR takeoff stock, steel bedded. I found it shot much better with Black hills 175gr than with Federal Gold Medal.

7 shots at 100 yds (elevation adjustment made after the first two shots were obviously a little high):

http://i854.photobucket.com/albums/ab104/ASH556/100yd.jpg

And 3 shots at 600 (That's a 2" bull):

http://i854.photobucket.com/albums/ab104/ASH556/600yd.jpg

So, it was a solid sub-MOA gun out to 600.

Here's what she looked like when I traded her for my SBR:

http://i854.photobucket.com/albums/ab104/ASH556/IMG_7278.jpg

abanks8245

10-09-12, 16:56

Glad to see it is shooting well for you, we carry black hills at the shop I work at, the Amax in 168 and 175 SMK, I have to give them a try to see how they turn out

sheep_dog_gunner

10-10-12, 19:09

Anyone happen to try the BALS MK-2 bean bag from SKD? Curious how it worked out for anyone, especially if they have the same gun. Is that whats on yours ASH556?

ASH556

10-10-12, 20:31

Anyone happen to try the BALS MK-2 bean bag from SKD? Curious how it worked out for anyone, especially if they have the same gun. Is that whats on yours ASH556?

Yup, that's the very one. I liked it a lot.