montanadave
08-27-12, 11:57
A news station in Columbia, SC, is reporting that Pfc. Michael Burnett pleaded guilty to manslaughter and gang charges in connection with the December deaths of a former soldier, Michael Roark, and Roark's 17-year-old girlfriend.
Burnett reportedly testified that he and several other soldiers had formed an "anarchist militia," had accumulated $87K worth of arms and bomb-making equipment, had plans to take over Fort Stewart, bomb civilian targets, and assassinate President Obama. Roark was apparently aware of the plans of the "militia" and was killed to prevent him from informing anyone else.
Sketchy details in the story (http://www.wistv.com/story/19384876/ga-murder-case-uncovers-terror-plot-by-soldiers). Are the soldiers allegedly involved in this "militia" active duty? And if they are, why would they not be tried by a court martial? I don't know the legalities involved and I imagine the military can defer to civilian prosecution if they so choose. I'm guessing we might hear more about this one.
ETA: More details here http://news.yahoo.com/prosecutor-ga-murder-case-uncovers-terror-plot-173341769.html
Burnett reportedly testified that he and several other soldiers had formed an "anarchist militia," had accumulated $87K worth of arms and bomb-making equipment, had plans to take over Fort Stewart, bomb civilian targets, and assassinate President Obama. Roark was apparently aware of the plans of the "militia" and was killed to prevent him from informing anyone else.
Sketchy details in the story (http://www.wistv.com/story/19384876/ga-murder-case-uncovers-terror-plot-by-soldiers). Are the soldiers allegedly involved in this "militia" active duty? And if they are, why would they not be tried by a court martial? I don't know the legalities involved and I imagine the military can defer to civilian prosecution if they so choose. I'm guessing we might hear more about this one.
ETA: More details here http://news.yahoo.com/prosecutor-ga-murder-case-uncovers-terror-plot-173341769.html