Tactical Arms Mfr. Inc. - adopting Bill Ruger's philosophy?

[Wildcat]

“Frankly, I think there’s no need for anybody to have such . . . magazines, 20 or 30 rounds. It makes no sense at all to have that large of a magazine, even for personal protection,”
Ken Rinkor, vice president of Tactical Arms Manufacturer, Inc

LINK to story (http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3734372/gun-makers-fret-as-gun-control.html#storylink=cpy)

[Airhasz]

“Frankly, I think there’s no need for anybody to have such . . . magazines, 20 or 30 rounds. It makes no sense at all to have that large of a magazine, even for personal protection,”
Ken Rinkor, vice president of Tactical Arms Manufacturer, Inc

LINK to story (http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/18/3734372/gun-makers-fret-as-gun-control.html#storylink=cpy)

No need to have a Ruger either the way I see it.

[GunnutAF]

Best way to tell that asshat that you disagree with him is spend your money else where!:rolleyes:

[thopkins22]

What a joke of a company. I read the phrase "assault rifle" about one million times on their homepage.

There's no reason for us to buy their products. **** 'em...doesn't sound like they would have survived for long anyway, at least based on the vibe I got of their quality and the accessories they will clamp on for you. As manufacturers have been improving quality and responding to demand, these jokers have raced to the bottom.



I also bet that unlike Ruger, they don't even have the balls to actually stand by their wrong reasoning. I guarantee that they're selling their "assault rifles" to civilians, and I noticed that all of their pictures show 30 round magazines in their rifles.

[sammage]

Looks like a cheap AR manufacturer that offers NC Star and Sightmark with their POS rifles. Wouldn't be getting any of my money anyways.