PDA

View Full Version : It's Maryland's turn...



kry226
01-23-13, 06:46
Received this in an email from the NRA today regarding new legislation introduced in the Maryland legislature. I cannot wait to get out of this idiotic state, but in the meantime, Marylandistan residents need to get busy contacting their representatives.


Governor Martin O’Malley has made targeting the rights of law-abiding gun owners a legislative priority this session, and his proposals could soon be considered, pass and become law. His anti-gun legislation has been introduced as Senate Bill 281, an attack on our Second Amendment rights and hunting heritage in Maryland. This bill has been referred to the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, but at this time has not been scheduled for a hearing. Senate Bill 281 is expected to move very quickly through the legislative process, so it is imperative that you contact committee members and your own state Senator IMMEDIATELY and urge them to oppose this legislation!

Senate Bill 281 represents simple politics and presents no viable solutions to prevent violent crime. These anti-gun proposals have been tried in the past as an easy “solution” - and have been proven resounding failures across the country. Criminals simply do not obey gun bans, register their firearms or comply with any gun control schemes. As a result, only law-abiding citizens will obey the law and be left defenseless. The following misguided policies can be found in Senate Bill 281:

•A ban on the transport, sale, purchase, transfer or possession of commonly owned semi-automatic centerfire rifles that have a detachable magazine and one additional characteristic – such as a pistol grip, telescoping stock, flash suppressor, threaded barrel etc. under the political misnomer “assault weapons.” Currently owned firearms must be registered with the Maryland State Police before November 1, 2013, and persons moving into Maryland must register all regulated firearms within thirty days of residency. Contrary to claims by the media and the Governor himself, these are not “military weapons designed for human carnage.” In fact, there are vast, legal and mechanical differences between a semi-automatic firearm and a fully automatic “military” firearm. Fully-automatic firearms are defined as “machineguns” under federal law, and are heavily regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968, and long-standing state laws. They are not readily available to the public, are registered federally and have been banned in many states for years. Other than for gun control supporters’ misleading propaganda purposes, fully-automatic firearms have nothing substantial to do with semi-automatic “assault weapon” legislation or laws. Semi-automatics and all other firearms, such as bolt-actions, pump-actions, lever-actions, revolvers, double-barreled shotguns, and single-shot firearms, fire only once when the trigger is pulled. They’re not "unpredictable weapons designed for mass carnage," as many in the news media would have you believe, but are tools commonly used by the law-abiding for self-defense, hunting and target shooting.


•Restrict magazine capacity to no more than ten rounds. While O’Malley incessantly repeats that his proposals do not infringe on Second Amendment rights and that he is not going after handguns, his claims become impossible to believe with the inclusion of this limit on self-defense. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court observed that "the inherent right of self-defense has been central to the Second Amendment right," and it declared that the amendment "guarantee[s] the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation." Millions of rifles and tens of millions of handguns designed for self-defense are designed to use magazines that hold more than ten rounds. Because the Second Amendment protects the right to self-defense, a magazine limit is a direct attack on this right, as a defensive use of a firearm could be unsuccessful if the defender were arbitrarily limited in the number of rounds of ammunition available. Further, as history bears testament, the federally-imposed magazine limit in effect between 1994 and 2004 had no effect on crime.


•Require a state permit to purchase, rent, or otherwise be in possession of a handgun. This permit would be obtained from the Maryland State Police after prospective gun purchasers complete a mandatory 8-hour gun safety class, submit their fingerprints to a state-run database, and undergo an extensive state-funded background check – in addition to the federal background check. Additionally, every new Maryland gun owner would have to reapply for a license to keep their legally possessed firearm every five years. All of these new requirements have fees that only penalize law-abiding gun owners. These laws serve no crime-fighting purpose, because criminals don’t register themselves or their guns, and most get guns from theft or the black market. Registration has led to gun confiscation in some foreign countries and some U.S. states. Further, Maryland already has a de-facto registration scheme in places as the Maryland State Police keep records of legally purchased firearms.

Senate Bill 281 clearly overreaches and misses the mark. It will do nothing to stop crime and will only penalize the law-abiding. One thing is for certain: Anti-gun politicians are attacking your rights as an easy target because they will not focus on real solutions for the criminal acts of violence. The NRA-ILA will continue to send updates on this matter as details become available to us. It is of the utmost importance that you act NOW to stop all attempts to ban firearms and enact more ineffective and onerous gun control laws. This bill is expected to move very quickly through the legislative process, so it is imperative that you contact members of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee and your own state senator IMMEDIATELY and urge them to oppose this legislation!

Contact information for your state senator can be found by clicking here.

Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Members:

Senator Brian E. Frosh, Chairman (D-16)

301-858-3124

brian.frosh@senate.state.md.us



Senator Lisa A. Gladden, Vice Chairman (D-41)

410-841-3697

lisa.gladden@senate.state.md.us



Senator James Brochin (D-42)

410-841-3648

jim.brochin@senate.state.md.us



Senator Joseph M. Getty (R-5)

410-841-3683

joseph.getty@senate.state.md.us



Senator Jennie M. Forehand (D-17)

301-858-3134

jennie.forehand@senate.state.md.us



Senator Nancy Jacobs (R-34)

410-841-3158

nancy.jacobs@senate.state.md.us



Senator C. Anthony Muse (D-26)

301-858-3092

anthony.muse@senate.state.md.us



Senator Jamie Raskin (D-20)

301-858-3634

jamie.raskin@senate.state.md.us



Senator Christopher B. Shank (R-2)

301-858-3903

christopher.shank@senate.state.md.us



Senator Norman R. Stone Jr. (D-6)

410-841-3587

norman.stone@senate.state.md.us



Senator Bobby A. Zirkin (D-11)

410-841-3131

bobby.zirkin@senate.state.md.us

brickboy240
01-23-13, 12:35
Just like we told the New Yorkers...


...if you want to be a "gun guy" you probably need to leave those blue states for good.

Otherwise take up golf or tennis and call it good. You will never out-number the leftist turds running those states so why stay there and put up with their shit?

At least in California, you have nice weather and pretty beaches. You east coaters get shitty weather AND rampant liberalism.

Leave...you won't miss it.

-brickboy240

CarlosDJackal
01-23-13, 13:12
I moved from MD to VA back in the Summer of 2000. The reason I did so was because I noticed the apathy that MD Gun Owners had towards guns laws that were being debated in the State Capital.

In the Spring of 2000 a Bill to create a "Ballistic Fingerprinting" system for all civilian-owned firearms in the state was stalled in the MD Judiciary Committee. In response to a (public) bribe offered by then Governor Glendening, one of the dumboKratic members of that committee illegally took the bill out of their hands and delivered it to the Senate for debate and voting. Glendening had (illegally) taken funds that were raised by the MD Lottery (and therefore earmarked for Education) and offered to split the funds between any Districts whose Delegate votes for the bill.

A protest was planned at Annapolis during the last night of the debates. I told every Gun Owner I knew that they should attend and consider joining the NRA. IIRC, only about 60 of us showed up for that protest. None of the Gun Owners I knew bothered to do so - each of whom had all sorts of excuse for it.

We were so underwhelming in our numbers we combined with another group who was protesting the proposed "purchase" of their homes under the Imminent Domain Law. The residents and their friends and family of this small neighborhood in Baltimore County that was earmarked for commercialization as another waterfront attraction was larger than we were.

Seeing the apathy of the MD Gun Owners that night convinced me that that state is doomed. That is when I started looking for another job either in PA or VA. BTW, most of the Gun Owners I knew finally joined the NRA and has become more active in politics after that bill was passed only to waste $50 million in tax money to produce what is basically a registration database of all handgun owners in the state. A little too late in my book.

kry226
01-23-13, 16:33
Agreed.

If I could leave, I would. But I am here at the pleasure of Uncle Sugar. :(