DevilDog
08-07-06, 09:57
<Disclaimer>
All urls below were found via searching on google, I do not frequent these sites and in no way believe they are any more of a credible news source than any other.
<\Disclaimer>
I am a firm believer that one cannot believe anyting we see on the news, read in the papers, etc, without a fair amount of investigation and confirming via other sources. Rather-Gate was a great example of this.
As far as my middle-east politics go, I am more accurately an anti-Arab vs. pro-Isreali. Many think our backing Isreali is what gets the US into trouble. I believe (and history seems to support this) that Arabs, without someone other than Arabs to fight, would fight each other. Even if Isreal did not exist, most Arab states would be anti-US just because the money/power in most Arab states want to maintain the status quo and the threat of western culture-corruption is too much.
Now onto the links!
I saw on the news this morning that Reutur's fired a freelance Lebonese photographer for submitting a docotored photograph which showed the after affects of an Isreali attack being more devastating than the original photo showed.
No wonder the drones of the world end up supporting the wrong side!?
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/747018.html
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/184208.php
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3286966,00.html
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200608/s1707782.htm
Ain't that somethin'!? So I googled Qana, and found a few more interesting tidbits of possible misdirection. It looks like Qana maybe was not that big of a tragedy?! I maybe on the slow side on this topic, but had not heard of it previously.
http://www.americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=5726
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1675647/posts
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/kaplan052806.htm
Additional disclaimer - I have not research possible alternative misdirection done in the other direction in order to drum up pro-Isreali support.
All urls below were found via searching on google, I do not frequent these sites and in no way believe they are any more of a credible news source than any other.
<\Disclaimer>
I am a firm believer that one cannot believe anyting we see on the news, read in the papers, etc, without a fair amount of investigation and confirming via other sources. Rather-Gate was a great example of this.
As far as my middle-east politics go, I am more accurately an anti-Arab vs. pro-Isreali. Many think our backing Isreali is what gets the US into trouble. I believe (and history seems to support this) that Arabs, without someone other than Arabs to fight, would fight each other. Even if Isreal did not exist, most Arab states would be anti-US just because the money/power in most Arab states want to maintain the status quo and the threat of western culture-corruption is too much.
Now onto the links!
I saw on the news this morning that Reutur's fired a freelance Lebonese photographer for submitting a docotored photograph which showed the after affects of an Isreali attack being more devastating than the original photo showed.
No wonder the drones of the world end up supporting the wrong side!?
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/747018.html
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/184208.php
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3286966,00.html
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200608/s1707782.htm
Ain't that somethin'!? So I googled Qana, and found a few more interesting tidbits of possible misdirection. It looks like Qana maybe was not that big of a tragedy?! I maybe on the slow side on this topic, but had not heard of it previously.
http://www.americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=5726
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1675647/posts
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/kaplan052806.htm
Additional disclaimer - I have not research possible alternative misdirection done in the other direction in order to drum up pro-Isreali support.