PDA

View Full Version : this makes the mossberg look good...


Ring
07-04-13, 00:22
http://swqu.net/board/swqu/src/1366857422780.jpg
lethal dose
07-04-13, 00:23
This has to be a joke.
Bulletdog
07-04-13, 00:48
I feel like if I put that in my safe it would somehow "infect" my other guns.:bad:
rackham1
07-04-13, 01:21
No way guys, this is fine. It's perfectly OK because we all know the Framers only intended the 2A to cover one-shot muzzleloaders.
Zane1844
07-04-13, 01:53
No way guys, this is fine. It's perfectly OK because we all know the Framers only intended the 2A to cover one-shot muzzleloaders.

That is an assault muzzleloader pictured.
3 AE
07-04-13, 02:18
How much?
Peshawar
07-04-13, 03:15
The backwards Eotech knockoff really sets off the lines of that beast.
rackham1
07-04-13, 03:16
double tap
rackham1
07-04-13, 03:16
That is an assault muzzleloader pictured.

I guess you're right, because even though it's one shot, how could the Framers have envisioned the sheer lethality of tactical-looking features?
polymorpheous
07-04-13, 07:43
Looks like a NFA firearm also.
:rolleyes:
Skyyr
07-04-13, 14:18
Looks like a NFA firearm also.
:rolleyes:

Muzzle-loaders aren't subject to NFA laws. They aren't firearms.
grunz
07-04-13, 14:37
They ruined it with the grip pod..... :(
Zane1844
07-04-13, 14:51
I guess you're right, because even though it's one shot, how could the Framers have envisioned the sheer lethality of tactical-looking features?

Exactly.

For the safety of our children that muzzleloader needs to be featureless.
Moose-Knuckle
07-04-13, 15:25
No bayonet . . . :confused:
ZoneOne
07-04-13, 16:23
The backwards Eotech knockoff really sets off the lines of that beast.

It's a Sight Mark ($80 red dot) and it's mounted correctly.

Though you're right it does look like a backwards Eotech knockoff.
Spiffums
07-04-13, 16:44
I know what I'm getting for muzzle-loader season this year!!!
Peshawar
07-04-13, 17:09
It's a Sight Mark ($80 red dot) and it's mounted correctly.

Though you're right it does look like a backwards Eotech knockoff.

I don't want it now. There goes half the charm! ;)
Amicus
07-04-13, 17:14
It's a Sight Mark ($80 red dot) and it's mounted correctly.

Though you're right it does look like a backwards Eotech knockoff.

+1. But, I had to Google Sight Mark to find that out.
polymorpheous
07-04-13, 17:34
Muzzle-loaders aren't subject to NFA laws. They aren't firearms.

Oh yeah.
Deep!
High Tower
07-04-13, 18:13
All its missing is a slidefire stock.

Its good to see a sharp flash hider on there. With all the smoke you don't want the flash to give your position away. :D
ForTehNguyen
07-05-13, 09:50
The backwards Eotech knockoff really sets off the lines of that beast.

the sightmark eotech clone is suppose to be mounted like that
ShortytheFirefighter
07-08-13, 11:46
No bayonet lug, not interested.

I want my SBR muzzleloaders to be able to skewer bad guys if I don't have time for a sweet tac reload.
streck
07-08-13, 11:50
This has been on the interweb for a year or so and is a joke....or was presented as one when the renewal for the AWB was in full swing....