Tactical Intent RE.

[sinlessorrow]

Anyone have any informstion on these?
http://www.tacticalintent.com/Receiver-Extension-Carbines-Tactical-Intent/dp/B004MAFZPO

They claim 7075 as the material used, as well as being a proper 4 position, and it is mil spec dimensions.

I am making a clone build and the Colt 4 position are running close to $100 and this is $20. It could be to good to be true but figured I would ask.

[markm]

There is NO $20 RE that I would EVER EVER use.

[sinlessorrow]

There is NO $20 RE that I would EVER EVER use.

Its on sale regular $44, brownells has them for the same sale price.

[markm]

Ah... I see. At a flat $20, I'd have said they were out right lying. Still though... REs are too critical to me to lose sleep over.

[sinlessorrow]

Ah... I see. At a flat $20, I'd have said they were out right lying. Still though... REs are too critical to me to lose sleep over.

Yeah, I just dont want to pay $100 for a Colt 4 position and I swear no one else makes a 4 position carbine re. If it could be 6 position I wouldny care, but the Colt is just simply a rip off.

[kdcgrohl]

I am making a clone build and the Colt 4 position are running close to $100 ...

Colt for $50 =
http://www.gandrtactical.com/cgi-bin/commerce.cgi?preadd=action&key=SP64072

[sinlessorrow]

Colt for $50 =
http://www.gandrtactical.com/cgi-bin/commerce.cgi?preadd=action&key=SP64072

Are you shitting me! Well that solves that problem.....I gotta stop looking at SAW.

[Plasman]

I bought some of their 6-position 7075 tube kits last year. I called them to find out if I could swap the carbine buffer in their kit for their H buffer instead and they were super nice and easy to deal with. I confirmed with them over the phone that they are milspec diameter and 7075 alloy. The only complaint I have is that the threaded area is a bit shorter than BCM, LMT, ect. but they work just fine. I'd buy them again.