PDA

View Full Version : Arsenal Strike One - starting something new



Arctic1
10-31-14, 09:40
PREFACE:
The company I work for is the Norwegian distributor for Arsenal Firearms in Norway. That said, I have purchased this pistol with my own money. It was not given to me by neither Arsenal or my work.
I have not shot the gun I am reviewing at the time of this post, my personal gun, but I have shot several hundred rounds though our demo guns.

I have been looking forward to this day for quite a while. I met with the Arsenal team at IWA in Nürnberg, back in March this year, after having read quite a bit about the pistol online. The new design features were what intrigued me the most. After handling the various models they had on display, as well as getting a detailed breakdown of the gun and it’s various features, I knew I wanted one.

We were set up as a distributor, and after a few long months, we finally received our first shipment of pistols this week. Arsenal Firearms is a small company, and the current demand for the gun has been slightly overwhelming for them, causing a slight delay in production times. That said, they are taking neccessary steps to expand their operation, in order to meet this demand. They are good people, and are truly working hard to bring this gun to the market in a good way.

Now, on to the pistol.

Overview:
The pistol comes in a carbon colored hard plastic carry case, the same one that comes with the Tanfoglio Stock III. Inside the box you receive:


Strike One pistol w/ magazine inserted
1 spare magazine
Maintenance kit
Lube bottle
Ambidextrous safety
Safety and instruction manual
Carry case pamphlet
Key for locking case



http://imageshack.com/a/img631/1723/4MkwGu.jpg

The Strike One comes in the following colors:
Black frame
Tan frame
Green frame
Stainless Steel

There are a few other models, including an Ergal-frame version in different colors, an All Weather version, with Cerakoted slides to match the frame and a competition-focused model called the Strike One Speed. All guns will be available in 9x19 and .40 S&W.

The Strike Two, or Combat version, is also set for release.

Techincal Specs:
The pistol itself has a sturdy feel to it, and it does weigh a bit more than the Glock 17.

Glock 17: 736 grams
Strike One: 918 grams

http://imageshack.com/a/img674/287/kdcCHA.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img674/4342/I1sKYb.jpg

Weight is for gun with empty magazine inserted.

The Strike One is also 2cm longer than the Glock 17. I had thought the gun to be a bit smaller, prior to seeing it the first time at IWA.

Magazine capacity is 17+1.

Frame:
The frame is constructed using fiberglass, carbon and a type of reinforced rubber fiber (composite polymer). The exact composition is a secret, and supposedly costs three times as much to produce as a Glock frame. It is said to have a significantly longer service life as well.

Inside the frame is a large steel insert, that houses all of the operating components, in a pretty sleek fashion.


Ejector
Trigger bar
Sear


http://imageshack.com/a/img673/9396/g8vsUB.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img912/9431/CcrPTI.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img661/7577/ZyNsdm.jpg

The insert also provides the rails that the slide rides on.
The insert can be removed by pusing out the rear and front frame pins.

The mag release comes set up for right handed shooters as standard from the factory. It can easily be switched over for left handed shooters, in less than 20 seconds when you know how to do it. You can also install the ambi-release, if so desired. Using this, however, can result in the mag unintentionally dropping from the gun during firing, depending on grip strength.
Both operations are done by depressing a flat spring inside the grip, and letting the mag release drop out.

The slide catch is not really remarkable in any way. Placement is good, at least for my hands, and it is easily manipulated.

The frame comes with a 1913 picatinny accessory rail.

Slide:
The slide comes with both front and rear cocking serrations.

http://imageshack.com/a/img909/7141/5dNEhe.jpg

The internals of the slide are the extractor assembly, firing pin assembly and the firing pin safety.

http://imageshack.com/a/img540/4662/GHKzFp.jpg

The internals are accessed by removing the back plate; you do this by depressing extractor spring plug visible on the back plate. After you depress this, slide the back plate up and remove. The back plates has a firing pin hole, where the rear of the firing pin will protrude when the pistol is cocked.

http://imageshack.com/a/img674/2528/d3A603.jpg

The front of the slide holds the barrel, locking block and recoil spring assembly in place. The recoil spring is a flat-wire spring design, captive on a plastic guide rod.

http://imageshack.com/a/img904/5888/XuBGal.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img537/7596/WzWG4f.jpg

The locking block sits in a slot in the slide, and in between two ridges on the barrel itself. When assembled, the main take down pin slides through the track on the locking block, and holds the slide in place. During firing and unlocking, the barrel moves straight to the rear only a short distance, as the locking block is pushed down into the frame, as it rides along the main take down pin that runs through the locking block track.

http://imageshack.com/a/img913/3637/E1QQzX.jpg

Locked:
http://imageshack.com/a/img661/2218/GEOiRu.jpg

Unlocked:
http://imageshack.com/a/img540/3471/8ygm9T.jpg

This feature helps reduce movement in the barrel during firing, and should contribute to the overall accuracy of the pistol. It also allows for the bore line to sit closer to the top of the frame. Just roughly measured, from the estimated bore line, to the middle of my palm, the Strike One bore line is about 1cm lower than the Glock 17 (6,5 cm vs. 7,5 cm). While the height of the bore line is not a defining feature of handgun controllability, the lesser the distance is between the pivot point of the main contact point (hand) and the bore line, ie the higher up on the bore line you come, the more effect it will have on recoil characteristics.

The locking block only fits one way, so there is no risk of installing it incorrectly.

A comparison pic of a Strike One and a Sig P226:
http://imageshack.com/a/img537/6370/YOK7F2.jpg

Trigger:
I think the trigger is very nice, and miles better than a factory Glock trigger. There is a little bit of slack at first, as you press the trigger, in order to disengage the trigger safety. It then has a smooth pull all the way through, with a nice crisp break. Reset is a hair bit longer than the Glock trigger, but very definitve and crisp.

Sights:
The sights are a 3-dot type, using non-illuminating white dots.

The gun comes with a non-adjustable rear sight that is integrated with the back plate. In my opinion, this is not an ideal solution, and will limit the amount of aftermarket support. That said, it is not an impossible task to manufacture sights based on the same concept. The rear notch is a bit too narrow for my liking, but it should be ok after some dedicated training.

The front sight sits in a dove tail on the front of the slide, and will have to be drifted in order to make any adjustments.

I will hopefully get to the range this weekend, to check zero and accuracy.

The integrated rear sight will be the standard sight configuation, but Arsenal is releasing a more competition oriented gun called Strike One Speed, that comes with adjustable rear sights that sit in a dove tail on the slide, as well as a fiber optic front sight.

Barrel:
I do not have specs on the barrel at this time, as it is a different barrel than the one on the demo gun. We had Arsenal adjust the barrel length from 128mm to 127mm, in order to make it Production-legal. Will add details once I get the info.

http://imageshack.com/a/img674/4097/0uLAZ5.jpg

I will hopefully get to the range this weekend, to check zero and accuracy.

montrala
11-03-14, 05:00
I see that you have version with non removable rear sight (is new version even out yet?). What you think on rear sight? For me it was one of weakest points - whole rear sight to narrow for fast acquisition. I also did not like notch width too much (little to narrow for me as well).

Digital_Damage
11-03-14, 07:35
seems like a promising pistol.

One gripe I have is from a company image thing... They need to dump the AF2011-a1 from all marketing venues. When people look to see the pedigree of the company and see that thing I'm sure many don't investigate any further.

Arctic1
11-03-14, 11:29
I see that you have version with non removable rear sight (is new version even out yet?). What you think on rear sight? For me it was one of weakest points - whole rear sight to narrow for fast acquisition. I also did not like notch width too much (little to narrow for me as well).

I have seen pictures of the Strike One "Speed", and we have gotten product info and images for it. I have been told it would not be available yet, although I did get an estimate for release by the end of the year. We have a few ordered, but they were back ordered on the shipment we received.

Regarding the sights, I think the rear sight could be improved. I agree that the rear notch is a bit too narrow, and the overall size of the sight is a bit small. I hope that we can work with a US based manufacturer to make aftermarket sights for the standard version as well as for the Speed version. That said, it is fully shootable the way it comes, there is just room for some improvements.

Avedis
11-04-14, 14:46
very interested

Surf
11-04-14, 19:24
Thanks for the write up. I will be following this one and looking forward to getting one in my hands to try out.

Coal Dragger
11-05-14, 02:15
Thanks for the write up and review, I especially appreciate the photos.

I'm interested in this pistol, but still skeptical about the ability of their US distributor to pull off good service and marketing. Plus I'm frustrated that the pistols are still vaporware over here.

Magsz
11-05-14, 09:26
Zero interest in the first generation of this.

LAV posted some photos of a "competition" model strike one that had a lightened slide, a regular dovetail in the rear and a fiber front.

I also still dont understand that reinforcement ridge in the beavertail area, at all. I understand, structurally why its there but from a comfort standpoint, i raise an eyebrow at this...

Arctic1
11-05-14, 10:19
The model in the photo that LAV posted is called the Strike One Speed.

It replaces the original adjustable rear sight version.
It is supposed to be released for full production later this year.

Regarding the ridge in the beaver tail area, it is not noticeable when gripping or shooting the gun.

montrala
11-05-14, 10:55
Regarding the ridge in the beaver tail area, it is not noticeable when gripping or shooting the gun.

That is true, it did not bother me at all as well. I have things I do not like in this pistol, but this is not one of those.

WickedWillis
11-05-14, 13:36
I may be in the minority on this one, but I really want to get my hands on one of these.

10mmSpringfield
11-05-14, 14:05
It's nice and inexpensive, but If I needed a good beater gun I'd still probably go with the HK VP9.

Good to have choices that aren't Block, tho.

WickedWillis
11-05-14, 14:10
It's nice and inexpensive, but If I needed a good beater gun I'd still probably go with the HK VP9.

Good to have choices that aren't Block, tho.

I wouldn't quite classify the VP9 as a beater gun. It can take a beating, but it's not priced in the "beater gun" category. Neither is this.

Arctic1
11-05-14, 16:17
I got this picture today from a customer, that shows an 11 shot group, fired from 20 meters, off-hand, at a mini-IPSC target:

http://imageshack.com/a/img538/2025/YL2DgC.jpg

WickedWillis
11-05-14, 16:18
I got this picture today, that shows an 11 shot group, fired from 20 meters, off-hand, at a mini-IPSC target:

http://imageshack.com/a/img538/2025/YL2DgC.jpg

Pretty impressive actually.

mattexass
11-05-14, 21:09
You have my attention. Looking forward to more and these hitting the U.S. market.

urbantactic
11-08-14, 12:10
I've been interested in these since I watched this (http://youtu.be/rI01qKAqYts?list=UU0zNoCMMiPEAst0JrwUht0w) LV video. All these guys appear to be using Strike One's.

montrala
11-08-14, 17:06
I've been interested in these since I watched this (http://youtu.be/rI01qKAqYts?list=UU0zNoCMMiPEAst0JrwUht0w) LV video. All these guys appear to be using Strike One's.

Consider what alternatives they have (http://imzcorp.com/en/company/268.html) and no wonder they use Striz. It was designed for them. They used limited numbers of Glocks, but there is strong tradition of using own production firearms, even for SOF.

Arctic1
11-11-14, 14:08
Allright, a quick update.

I have been to the range with the Strike One twice now, although yesterday was the first real training session. Have put a total of 550 rounds through it, without a hiccup. I prepped the gun with FIREClean prior to the first outing, and I don't plan on cleaning it any time soon.

I really like the gun, and will shoot my first match with it this coming weekend.

I have decided to approach this gun with a "fresh start" perspective, in order to properly learn the gun, not just apply old knowledge to a new platform.
I feel this approach has been correct for me, as there are a few areas that are different between this and the Glock. The three main areas are:

-Acquiring proper grip for the draw
The Strike One has a pretty pronounced beaver tail compared to the Glock, and I sometimes miss my grip, thus hitting the beaver tail. It will get better with more training and dry fire. I need to improve my draw time as well, my goal is to shoot a sub 2 second Bill Drill, and it's all in the draw.

-Trigger
The trigger is very nice, but still different from the Glock trigger I have used over the last year, so I need to learn the "feel" of this trigger.

-Sights
Sights are personal preference, and there are endless variations out there for people to choose from. The factory rear sights on this pistol has a pretty narrow notch, so it will take a few more presentations before tracking the sights comes more naturally. Not an obstacle, by any means, just that a wider rear notch would allow for faster target acquisition. We have some cool stuff being prototyped at the moment, should be ready by Friday.

A couple of videos from yesterdays practice

2x2x2 @ 5 meters, 2.50 seconds, 2 C's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B7kDDwvEL0

This was a challenge from a friend, so I had to try it.

The second video:

2 steel plates, 1 mini-popper, 5 bowling pins @ 10 meters, 7,15 seconds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQecioG7oms

I missed the last plate as I drove my gun past it, and had to make it up. Bowling pins are deceptively hard to hit.

I ended the session with an accuracy test, to see how well I would do at distance. I'll be the first guy to tell you that I am not very good at shooting groups past 15-17 meters. I have never practiced it that much - thus the "fresh start" approach, I am going to focus more on the long range stuff. I can make longer range shots, I am just not consistent when shooting groups.

9 shot group at 23 meters (25 yards), off-hand with no time limit at a full size IPSC target:

http://imageshack.com/a/img674/7679/4PQ0VX.jpg

I am satisfied with my hits, but will continue to work on improving my group size.

WickedWillis
11-11-14, 14:31
The more I see, the more that I want one. Nicely done sir. Those bowling pins are rough to hit.

Arctic1
04-02-15, 17:18
Been kinda quiet with regards to this gun, as we have been waiting for some upgrades.

This is a very new weapon, so as expected, some teething issues have presented themselves.
The issues I have had are:

-Broken firing pin at 999 rounds; this was a faulty batch of firing pins, where some made onto the production line. Unfortunate, but they have fixed the issue
-Failure to eject; thought it could have been the recoil spring assembly being too stiff, but currently it points to a single type of ammo I have shot being the culprit.
-Light primer strikes; they have upgraded to a stronger firing pin spring, which has fixed the issue

I installed the new firing pin spring and also a new fiber optic front sight on Tuesday, and took it to the range today. Haven't shot it in 3 months time (been shooting a Glock w/RDS these last months).

5 shot group at 20 meters (grey rectangle is 3x5):

http://imageshack.com/a/img913/4856/9AtZXc.jpg

I ran through approx 140 rounds in 1 hour, with a variety of different ammo, no failures.

WillBrink
04-02-15, 18:41
I ran through approx 140 rounds in 1 hour, with a variety of different ammo, no failures.

Now that you have 1K + rnds and time spent, would you recommend it over other more vetted offerings?

Arctic1
04-04-15, 07:46
As of my last post I have 1731 rounds through it.

A few hiccups, but nothing major. I think the transition from sampling and prototyping to full scale production wasn't as smooth as it should have been, but they are getting there.

I don't think I am at a round count or level of experience with this gun, to really say one way or the other whether or not I would recommend it over other more vetted offerings.

The potential is definitely there:

-Accurate out of the box
-Good ergonomics
-Very shootable gun; flat, soft recoil
-Good trigger, a bit long reset.

Once they work out the needed tweaks, it will definitely be a contender. The design principle behind the gun is solid, and works.

One issue is aftermarket support, with regards to sights and triggers. These are coming, through their custom shop. At IWA I handled a prototype trigger and saw a prototype adjustable rear sight that replaces the original back plate. They are also working on extended mags, threaded barrels etc. An add-on mag well was discussed as well, but personally I think the mag well is fine as it is.