PDA

View Full Version : Hornady 75 grain 5.56mm Superformance: Update



Molon
05-10-15, 11:58
Hornady 75 grain 5.56mm Superformance: Update

https://app.box.com/shared/static/mjmiqbesyutb809i0a5u8eup63815lv9.jpg





In 2010, I posted a sneak preview of Hornady’s 75 gain 5.56mm Superformance ammunition. When chronographed from a 20” Colt M16A2 barrel, this Superformance load produced the highest muzzle velocity for a 75 grain load that I had ever seen; 2909 FPS. The table below shows the muzzle velocity of the Superformance load compared to other Hornady loads charged with standard powders.




http://www.box.net/shared/static/d7ari6jk2d.jpg




Unfortunately, this increased velocity load came with a price; and I’m not referring to dollar signs. The accuracy of the 5.56mm 75 grain Superformance load was . . . how shall I say this? . . . sub-standard . . . for what myself and others had come to expect from a “premium” heavy OTM factory load. The smallest 10-shot group that I obtained from a chrome-lined, NATO chambered, 20” Colt HBAR at a distance of 100 yards had an extreme spread of 3.4” and a mean radius of 1.16”. Others who tested the load using match grade stainless steel barrels fared hardly better.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/b70hxyavt2vvibi778a58vfyhujvmalq.jpg




http://www.box.net/shared/static/knb2dg3c2f.jpg




Since that time, Hornady has made a few changes to the 5.56mm 75 grain Superformance load. For starters (and of no real consequence) the boxes for this load now carry a “match ammunition” nomenclature instead of the original “Varmint” label. Secondly, this load is now seated with the 75 grain “T2” projectile instead of the T1 found in the original load.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/zdbs51sfw5qpe4pccovq6vo34g5hkxd6.jpg





Thirdly, the velocity of this 5.56mm Superformance load has been reduced. While the original load produced of muzzle velocity of 2909 FPS from a 20” barrel, the new version had a muzzle velocity of 2863 FPS for a difference of 46 FPS. Most importantly, this new version of the load has shown significantly improved accuracy over the original version.

Following my usual protocol for accuracy testing, (described in detail here (https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?168982-Range-Report-Black-Hills-5-56mm-50-grain-TSX)) I fired three 10-shot groups in a row from a distance of 100 yards from a Lothar Walther barreled semi-automatic AR-15 with the Hornady 75 grain 5.56mm Superformance “Mod 1” ammunition. The resulting 10-shot groups had extreme spreads of:

1.31”
1.93”
1.02”

for an average 10-shot group extreme spread of 1.42”. The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.48”.


The smallest 10-shot group of the “Mod 1” Superformance ammunition.

https://app.box.com/shared/static/7gcmkqioy3pwmgsa6tg5gk9ajw2xc7kn.jpg




It should be noted that the Superformance powder creates a higher port-pressure for less than full-length gas systems compared to standard powders.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/sttxz9tojuww9iqr796lwijcwrx5m8o6.jpg



….

markm
05-10-15, 12:26
Wow. That's a crazy velocity. I wonder how bad the brass/case heads get beat up...

Molon
05-10-15, 12:36
Wow. That's a crazy velocity. I wonder how bad the brass/case heads get beat up...



From my original "sneak preview" testing . . .




http://www.box.net/shared/static/3nyqvs3oel.jpg



....

vicious_cb
05-10-15, 14:36
Since the load is now closer in line with 5.56 velocities Im curious if it would be safe to use out of carbine and mid gas system.

Bimmer
05-10-15, 14:58
So the "Superformance" stuff is now essentially like TAP? Same T2 bullet? Hardly any more velocity? Not quite as accurate?

I mean 25fps (2838 vs 2863) is NOT a BFD, is it?

markm
05-10-15, 21:02
Those case heads look pretty good.

lahunter57
05-11-15, 00:05
I just recently fired some of this through a Rainier 18" Ultramatch SPR barrel and every primer was popped. It's definitely some hot stuff. I wasn't shooting for groups so I can't speak on the performance.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

markm
05-11-15, 17:37
Yeah... those are the kind of reports I'm used to reading about Superformance. I wonder if the Ultramatch has a Wylde-ish chamber.

lahunter57
05-11-15, 17:40
Yeah... those are the kind of reports I'm used to reading about Superformance. I wonder if the Ultramatch has a Wylde-ish chamber.

Yes, it's supposed to be a .223 Wylde chamber. Could that have an effect on the pressures and the fact that I'm popping primers?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lahunter57
05-11-15, 17:48
I apologize, I fired the 75 grain 223 superformance. For some reason I have a box of 5.56 and .223, and I fired the .223 first. The velocities, per the label, are higher for the .223.

Anyway, here's what I got. Sorry if the images don't come out clear.

http://i60.tinypic.com/nl20id.jpg
http://i62.tinypic.com/t7ocva.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

markm
05-11-15, 18:25
Yes, it's supposed to be a .223 Wylde chamber. Could that have an effect on the pressures and the fact that I'm popping primers?


Absolutely. Wylde chambers are horrible with hot ammo. None the less.... if a load won't fire safely in a Wylde, I don't want to mess with it. We're able to reach way beyond practical/functional range of 77 OTMs without the downsides of super hot loads.

The velocities that this and the BH load are getting are impressive. But in my opinion, with the 77, you don't really have to push them that fast...

Molon
05-11-15, 18:47
The velocities, per the label, are higher for the .223.



Negative.



http://www.box.net/shared/static/p2gnggr5un.jpg



....

lahunter57
05-11-15, 18:55
Oh I believe you, I was just going off what the boxes said.

http://i61.tinypic.com/xlzfx1.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

hotrodder636
05-11-15, 19:08
Did you load your own brass? I am by no means an expert but in your picture, I see LC brass not Hornady.

From my original "sneak preview" testing . . .




http://www.box.net/shared/static/3nyqvs3oel.jpg



....

markm
05-11-15, 19:37
Did you load your own brass? I am by no means an expert but in your picture, I see LC brass not Hornady.

Manufacturers often use LC or WIN brass for 5.56 loads.

markm
05-11-15, 19:37
Did you load your own brass? I am by no means an expert but in your picture, I see LC brass not Hornady.

Manufacturers often use LC or WIN brass for 5.56 loads.

hotrodder636
05-12-15, 18:58
An example of why I continue to read on here...I keep learning. Thanks Mark

Molon
05-13-15, 08:24
Oh I believe you, I was just going off what the boxes said.

http://i61.tinypic.com/xlzfx1.jpg






The velocity of the 223 Remington load is obtained from a 24" barrel with a SAAMI chamber, while the velocity of the 5.56mm load is obtained from a 20" barrel with a NATO chamber.


....

Whytep38
05-13-15, 19:46
deleted; redundant.

Molon
07-24-15, 20:13
So the "Superformance" stuff is now essentially like TAP? Same T2 bullet? Hardly any more velocity? Not quite as accurate?





There's still the issue of the different pressure curve and higher port pressure with the Superformance load for less than rifle-length gas systems.

...

Junkie
07-24-15, 20:43
The pressure curve on it means that it won't gain as much from a longer barrel compared to a typical load. On the other hand, in a shorter gas system the higher pressure may cause some problems unless you have an adjustable gas block...