PDA

View Full Version : Accuracy Evaluation: Noveske 14.5 Afghan Upper



Molon
06-28-15, 19:42
Accuracy Evaluation of a Noveske 14.5” Afghan Upper

https://app.box.com/shared/static/mldp3d4mbvfd26jo6ec8jew3auba7aug.jpg




This is a Noveske assembled upper group based on the 14.5” stainless steel Noveske Afghan barrel. This barrel has a medium contour and a 0.750” diameter gas block journal. The gas block journal for this barrel is designed for Noveske’s low profile gas block and the journal is only one inch in length; standard length gas blocks will not work with this barrel.

The chamber found in this barrel is Noveske’s proprietary Noveske Match mod 0 chamber that “was developed to fire MK262 Mod 1 on AUTO in hot environments." The barrel has a 1:7” twist and polygonal rifling. The barrel extension has “M4” feed-ramps.

This upper comes with a Vltor MUR upper receiver with a forward assist. The barrel is free-floated in Noveske’s version of the SWS railed free-float hand-guard. Since the unwashed masses in my state are not allowed to own an SBR, this unit has an S.E. Vortex flash-hider pinned and welded to the muzzle.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/topjiqmuquh4yj2vj8101wen9at371ac.jpg




https://app.box.com/shared/static/m2wxguy1c1b9fsva4a1atq59r98x9cov.jpg




https://app.box.com/shared/static/76wvo1kpkntkqtcpcwawp9p8yhifl6xv.jpg




I conducted an accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the Noveske 14.5” Afghan barreled upper from my bench-rest set-up following my usual protocol. This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any group reduction techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The free-float hand-guard of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was attached to the objective-bell of the scope. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/xo4duzdgtp.jpg




https://app.box.com/shared/static/lkg47ptc04.jpg




For this evaluation, I used one of my standard match-grade hand-loads topped with Sierra 55 grain BlitzKings. When fired from my Krieger barreled AR-15s, this load has produced ½ MOA 10-shot groups at 100 yards.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/n5uicctmu8ve7kxmht3zboy2inihdvzq.jpg





Three 10-shot groups fired from the Afghan upper at a distance of 100 yards using the match grade hand-loads had extreme spreads of:

0.993”
0.941”
1.004”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 0.98”. I over-layed the three 10-shot groups on each other using RSI Shooting lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.33”.



The smallest 10-shot group . . .

https://app.box.com/shared/static/ix3oburcooui75yeudpa3ozhzyib9umo.jpg






The 30-shot composite group . . .

https://app.box.com/shared/static/f1yjegogvfe5angnqxcb3f144368baqi.jpg



....

bfoosh006
06-29-15, 08:14
Very interesting. As always thank you for your time and testing for all of us.

I am sure that I could spend numerous hours asking you questions about everything AR accuracy wise that I do not have experience with.

Thank You again for your continued "education" of us.


If you ever need a apprentice...... ;)

djegators
06-29-15, 09:05
I would say very nice results considering the intended application. Any indication that a different load might perform even better?

TinyCrumb
06-29-15, 17:51
Man I would love it if you had a chance to do Mk 262 with these evaluations. Since its commercially available, fairly cheap, and crazy accurate for a lot of our barrels (like Mk 12 setups) AND since this barrel has a chamber specifically designed for it … would be awesome to see how it performs.

ndmiller
06-29-15, 18:56
This is another great post, so thank you. Wish you had your own section so it would be easy to research barrels before purchase. Any chance you'll be evaluating some 10.5" barrels in the future?

Thanks again.

Noah

Thump_rrr
07-01-15, 02:37
What were the specifications of the Kreiger barrel?
Length, twist rate, chamber, etc?
What was the load used and was it developed for the Kreiger barrel?
Is it possible to test both both barrels side by side with a commercially available load for comparison such as Hornady Steel Match?