RD62
07-27-08, 15:02
Does anyone have any experience with the YHM Eotech riser?
I have a 512 on my MK18 clone and while I can get good hits with the absolute cowitness of the LMT rear, standard FSB, and Eotech reticle, I would prefer a lower 1/3 cowitness.
I don't really feel the need for QD, although it would be nice. The Larue seems very nice, but I won't be running NV behind my non-NV capable optic so the little piece of rail is unneeded and really unwanted. I wish ADM was making an EO riser...
Is the YHM version serviceable? Problems with durability? The price definately seems right, but you usually get what you pay for. I have a YHM bipod adaptor and it seems fine for a fixed mount. Share your thoughts and experiences?
-RD62
I have a 512 on my MK18 clone and while I can get good hits with the absolute cowitness of the LMT rear, standard FSB, and Eotech reticle, I would prefer a lower 1/3 cowitness.
I don't really feel the need for QD, although it would be nice. The Larue seems very nice, but I won't be running NV behind my non-NV capable optic so the little piece of rail is unneeded and really unwanted. I wish ADM was making an EO riser...
Is the YHM version serviceable? Problems with durability? The price definately seems right, but you usually get what you pay for. I have a YHM bipod adaptor and it seems fine for a fixed mount. Share your thoughts and experiences?
-RD62