PDA

View Full Version : Range Report: Hornady 5.56mm 62 Grain TAP Barrier



Molon
02-03-16, 16:45
Hornady 5.56mm 62 Grain TAP Barrier Ammunition


https://app.box.com/shared/static/6k5ljfl4fskpcg2jh69mvolahhdexz5s.jpg




https://app.box.com/shared/static/vcnqbuwpry6bh3ules67q8s83qyqcnca.jpg



Hornady’s 5.56mm 62 grain TAP Barrier ammunition (#8125N) is loaded with a 62 grain flat-base, soft-point bullet with a cannelure. This bullet has the largest amount of exposed lead at the meplat of any of the soft-point barrier-blind loads that I’ve evaluated.



https://app.box.com/shared/static/0tah1mfsotpq0k1uz7hm009xrff0uxrf.jpg




https://app.box.com/shared/static/rkgnr3srux58rxz7dbnv6cyqi0g0d5ru.jpg




Contrary to erroneous information that has been posted on the Internet, the bullet used in this ammunition is not a bonded projectile.



https://app.box.com/shared/static/teu6jwh48ss18jp3reiiuiu842o55cys.jpg




The case mouth is crimped and has an anaerobic sealant.



https://app.box.com/shared/static/nnwmfw5gmifx15gvfnjmreq5bm6xqkat.jpg





The primer pockets of this ammunition are crimped and have lacquer sealant. The case-heads read, “Hornady 5.56 NATO”. Hornady advertises that the ball powder used in this ammunition is temperature stabilized and has a flash retardant. The box label carries a warning that this ammunition is "NOT FOR USE IN .223 CHAMBERS".




https://app.box.com/shared/static/rws5fimbx7vl8ddj5ifwdxefp0sdlhie.jpg



Hornady advertises that this ammunition has a muzzle velocity of 3078 FPS when fired from a 20” 5.56x45mm NATO test barrel. For comparison, the US mil-spec for the velocity of M855 ammunition is as follows:

MIL-C-63989C [Amendment 4] states that the average velocity of the cartridges “shall be 3,020 feet per second (fps) plus or minus 40 fps at 78 feet from the muzzle of the weapon. The standard deviation of the velocity shall not exceed 40 fps.” This specification is for a 20” barrel and depending upon variables equates to a muzzle velocity of approximately 3105 FPS (plus or minus 40 FPS.)



As an aside, after reading the above specification, some of you may be wondering, “Why 78 feet from the muzzle?” The answer to that question is that this specification is simply an historical hold-over from the days when “circuit” chronographs (e.g. Le Boulenge Chronograph and the Aberdeen Chronograph) were used at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Frankford Arsenal and Springfield Armory. These types of chronographs required a significant distance between their first and second screens to produce accurate results.

As an example, when using the Boulenge Chronograph, the first screen of the chronograph was placed 3 feet in front of the muzzle and the second screen was placed 150 feet beyond the first screen. For those of you who might not be aware of the following fact; chronographs determine the velocity of the bullet at a point that is midway between the first and the second screen (i.e. not at the location of the first screen). Therefore, with the above spacing, the velocity of the bullet is determined for a point that is 75 feet from the first screen. So, add the three feet (from the muzzle to the first screen) to the 75 feet (the midway point of the screens) to obtain the “78 feet from the muzzle” distance.



https://app.box.com/shared/static/sj2isxyjw0iqtl0e1mcybqcg1g6hvaa8.jpg




https://app.box.com/shared/static/pj1xtbym3vnov134v10uaa87x5q0ro00.jpg




I chronographed the Hornady 5.56mm 62 grain TAP Barrier ammunition from a semi-automatic AR-15 with a chrome-lined, NATO chambered 20” Colt M16A2 barrel.




http://www.box.net/shared/static/h8daj1jhf1.jpg




Chronographing was conducted using an Oehler 35-P chronograph with “proof screen” technology. The Oehler 35P chronograph is actually two chronographs in one package that takes two separate chronograph readings for each shot and then has its onboard computer analyze the data to determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two readings. If there is a difference, the chronograph “flags” the shot to let you know that the data is invalid. There was no invalid data flagged during this testing.

The velocity stated below is the muzzle velocity as calculated from the instrumental velocity using Oehler’s Ballistic Explorer software program. The string of fire consisted of 10 rounds over the chronograph.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/qecrizgcgxyzqztvq5xvb9gczasq71q3.jpg




https://app.box.com/shared/static/psjsdukng1c4p5efyw096kuka7p2aliu.jpg




Each round was single-loaded and cycled into the chamber from a magazine fitted with a single-load follower. The bolt locked-back after each shot allowing the chamber to cool in between each shot. This technique was used to mitigate the possible influence of “chamber-soak” on velocity data. Each new shot was fired in a consistent manner after hitting the bolt release. Atmospheric conditions were monitored and recorded using a Kestrel 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/rwruh372al3yh9kafscx370ewe74e6el.jpg




Atmospheric conditions

Temperature: 78 degrees F
Humidity: 54%
Barometric pressure: 29.99 inches of Hg
Elevation: 950 feet above sea level


The muzzle velocity for the 10-shot string of the Hornady 5.56mm 62 grain TAP Barrier ammunition fired from the 20” Colt barrel was 3069 FPS with a standard deviation of 18 FPS and a coefficient of variation of 0.58%.






....


I conducted an accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the Hornady 5.56mm 62 grain TAP Barrier ammunition following my usual protocol. This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any group reduction techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Also, a control group was fired from the test-rifle used in the evaluation using match-grade, hand-loaded ammunition; in order to demonstrate the capability of the barrel. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The barrel used in the evaluation was free-floated. The free-float handguards of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was attached to the objective-bell of the scope. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.



https://app.box.com/shared/static/8ybmvvks8dyx1t1soslfzpxgah071370.jpg





The Wind Probe.

http://www.box.net/shared/static/lkg47ptc04.jpg





The test vehicle for this evaluation was one of my semi-automatic precision AR-15s with a 20” stainless-steel Lothar Walther barrel. The barrel has a 223 Wylde chamber with a 1:8” twist.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/xac10i5ekkey7ih9ej5a3n6nmv5gy4j9.jpg




Prior to firing the Hornady 5.56mm 62 grain TAP Barrier ammunition, I fired a 10-shot control group using a hand-load topped with the Hornady 73 grain A-MAX bullet. That group had an extreme spread of 0.82”.




https://app.box.com/shared/static/gbg7e7zlyhec917m1gbomgv2fidrd3o9.jpg



Three 10-shot groups of the Hornady 5.56mm 62 grain TAP Barrier ammunition were fired in a row with the resulting extreme spreads:

1.79”
1.23”
2.44”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 1.82”. The three 10-shot groups were over-layed on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.55”.



The smallest 10-shot group.

https://app.box.com/shared/static/bry07gfc7f80ncsj9ceefmh7simhsiq0.jpg





The 30-shot composite group.

https://app.box.com/shared/static/i3anenfdlyjny90me9zgz8u3oeoi7vs0.jpg



…..

Jellybean
02-03-16, 22:24
Between this, and the others I looked through on the reference page, you've done some of the most thorough range reports I've seen in. my. life.
Where's the like button here? I wish more people on the internet would provide detailed info like this.

I wonder...what the bribe would be to get you to do something similar for a few brands of "general use" pistol ammo.
Yes, I've been on a pistol ammo-research trip and am tired of hearing what people "say" with there being precious little supporting evidence aside from manufacturer stats, which I don't necessarily trust (because it's the manufacturer).

Molon
02-04-16, 21:17
I wonder...what the bribe would be to get you to do something similar for a few brands of "general use" pistol ammo.
Yes, I've been on a pistol ammo-research trip and am tired of hearing what people "say" with there being precious little supporting evidence aside from manufacturer stats, which I don't necessarily trust (because it's the manufacturer).





I'm thinking of doing a 9mm Parabellum version of Snapshots.


Snapshots: Range Reports (https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?175698-Snapshots-Range-Reports)



Here's are some of my 9mm ammunition reviews until then . . .


https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?168762-Federal-9mm-Luger-(-P)-124-grain-HST-Range-Report




https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?170477-Range-Report-Federal-9mm-Luger-147-Grain-HST





https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?175797-Range-Report-Speer-147-Grain-Gold-Dot-G2






https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?176320-Range-Report-Nosler-Defense-9mm-Luger-(-P)-124-Grain-Bonded-Tipped&p=2211634#post2211634


...

Ned Christiansen
02-04-16, 21:45
I've had very good accuracy with this load, such that it surprised me. Two or three groups under and inch, the rest not much over.... could dig out the targets, not gonna, your results carry more weight far as I'm concerned. Plus these were five-shot groups. I remember my impression though, I did not expect that given the round's purpose and construction but it made me think it may be an underappreciated round.

Hornady told me it was not bonded but had an extra-thick jacket. Have shot two during semi-annual FBI gel shooting and it does better than a good many loads on barriers but can't hang with certain others that really shine. Didn't shoot any into bare gel but I'd guess it would do well there. With the decent accuracy it displays it's been better for me group-wise than any of the really good barrier busters. It might just be an under-appreciated multi-tasker-- accuracy decent, barrier-decent, and not an over-penetrator when no barrier is present. Maybe.

I had no feeding issues even with that big lead booger out front, I did a test feeding the same round multiple times and although it got deformed it didn't fail to feed.

Jellybean
02-04-16, 23:22
I'm thinking of doing a 9mm Parabellum version of Snapshots.


I like that idea- almost exactly what I was thinking when I asked.

Have you pretty much got your ammo all lined up for that, or open to a few suggestions still?

Molon
02-05-16, 19:26
I like that idea- almost exactly what I was thinking when I asked.

Have you pretty much got your ammo all lined up for that, or open to a few suggestions still?


All lined up.

Colt guy
02-05-16, 19:58
Great write up.

Got to love benchrest shooters they know what it takes to remove as many variables as possible.


Great Job Molon

civiliansheepdog
02-06-16, 09:12
Great job, as usual, Molon.

cobra90gt
02-06-16, 12:23
Good stuff. :cool:

XD40Colorado
02-06-16, 13:28
That is atotally misleading name. It's nothing more than your standard softpoint. Hornady sucks IMO. Gimmicky ammo: Critical defense, TAP "Barrier". I think I'll stay away for awhile.