loki993
03-14-16, 11:16
I got a 6920 last year and I'm currently in the market for another. There is nothing the 6920 does wrong for my purposes it's just I feel the need for a second military pattern rifle for the collection. I also think I'm either going to SBR the colt I have now or the new gun...for a few more options and since I don't really have any interest in a SPR/DMR type rifle. Anything I'm shooting at will be inside 300 yards.
So here is the dilemma...I really like the Daniel Defense guns..but I don't like the price. I can get another 6920 OEM, drop a HG and stock on it for right around 1K. A DDM4V11 is going to run me around 1500. What does that extra 500 get me? A little nicer finish, I do really like the mil spec+ bronze but even that's an extra 200 over the 1500 on the standard gun? Aside from the name for what I'm doing, shooting either gun i'd be hard pressed to tell the difference I think..they're both high quality guns.
Also it feel a bit weird just buying the exact same gun I already have....but it's a means to an end...they won't be the same forever.
So for my purposes what do you think? I mean it probably seems obvious..I can get the colt, have a standard upper, get an SBR upper and only be out a touch more than if I bought the DD. If I went DD I would actually buy a pistol and then put a stock on it once the paperwork clears.
Doing searches on the internet seems to correlate quality to price....a few years ago when colts were expensive they were some of the best...now that they're cheap...people don't see to regard them with the same esteem..but that the internet for you and I take stuff like that with a grain of salt.
So the TL;DR is DD better than colt? Is DD better than colt enough to justify an extras 500 bucks.
One other thing. I know this is M4 carbine but as for semi auto rifles all I have is the colt and an SKS....if there was another military rifle to add the the collection is 2 ARs the best option or is there something else I should be looking at? For me it seems really hard going against the AR15 from the simple standpoint of how modular they are....you can really make one do just about anything you want it to....you really cant say that about any other rifle...
So here is the dilemma...I really like the Daniel Defense guns..but I don't like the price. I can get another 6920 OEM, drop a HG and stock on it for right around 1K. A DDM4V11 is going to run me around 1500. What does that extra 500 get me? A little nicer finish, I do really like the mil spec+ bronze but even that's an extra 200 over the 1500 on the standard gun? Aside from the name for what I'm doing, shooting either gun i'd be hard pressed to tell the difference I think..they're both high quality guns.
Also it feel a bit weird just buying the exact same gun I already have....but it's a means to an end...they won't be the same forever.
So for my purposes what do you think? I mean it probably seems obvious..I can get the colt, have a standard upper, get an SBR upper and only be out a touch more than if I bought the DD. If I went DD I would actually buy a pistol and then put a stock on it once the paperwork clears.
Doing searches on the internet seems to correlate quality to price....a few years ago when colts were expensive they were some of the best...now that they're cheap...people don't see to regard them with the same esteem..but that the internet for you and I take stuff like that with a grain of salt.
So the TL;DR is DD better than colt? Is DD better than colt enough to justify an extras 500 bucks.
One other thing. I know this is M4 carbine but as for semi auto rifles all I have is the colt and an SKS....if there was another military rifle to add the the collection is 2 ARs the best option or is there something else I should be looking at? For me it seems really hard going against the AR15 from the simple standpoint of how modular they are....you can really make one do just about anything you want it to....you really cant say that about any other rifle...