PDA

View Full Version : Suppressor in new Punisher movie


rsilvers
08-20-08, 12:44
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/images/news/punisher-war-zone/Punisher_Quad_1.jpg


Link to the trailer: http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/punisher-war-zone/comic-con-trailer

http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l69/armorgod/Punishercan.jpg
http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l69/armorgod/Punishercan1.jpg
http://www.aacblog.com/wp-content/uploads/punisher_warzone_aac_3.jpg
http://www.aacblog.com/wp-content/uploads/punisher_warzone_aac_4.jpg
http://www.aacblog.com/wp-content/uploads/punisher_warzone_aac_5.jpg
http://www.aacblog.com/wp-content/uploads/punisher_warzone_aac_6.jpg
http://www.aacblog.com/wp-content/uploads/punisher_warzone_aac_7.jpg
http://img65.imageshack.us/img65/3648/punisher1ww6.jpg
http://img65.imageshack.us/img65/3036/punisher2it7.jpg
Spade
08-20-08, 13:00
Movie looks pretty good. I wonder why they went with Ray over Tom Jane
Frank Castle
08-20-08, 15:14
Movie looks pretty good. I wonder why they went with Ray over Tom Jane
Tom left the movie a long ways back- before the first script rewrite. It was reportedly a big steaming pile of excrement. It has been extensively reworked- which could be good or bad. Usually bad, but I'll take my chances and check it out.
Spade
08-20-08, 15:53
Tom left the movie a long ways back- before the first script rewrite. It was reportedly a big steaming pile of excrement. It has been extensively reworked- which could be good or bad. Usually bad, but I'll take my chances and check it out.

Figures you would know with a screen name like that. Thanks Frank
twodollarbill
08-21-08, 14:33
Here's a link to the R-rated trailer

http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/punisher-war-zone/comic-con-trailer
MisterWilson
08-21-08, 14:37
And a C-more sight.

First COD4, now this. Are C-more's PR people working overtime or what?

They've remained largely in the shadows with regard to being a viable option for optics then *boom* out of the blue here they come again.
LOKNLOD
08-21-08, 14:55
And a C-more sight.

First COD4, now this. Are C-more's PR people working overtime or what?

They've remained largely in the shadows with regard to being a viable option for optics then *boom* out of the blue here they come again.

Eh, it's probably picked out by the same moron who decided to outfit the homies in the next room with the uber-tactical CQB-variant stainless scoped Ruger Redhawk :rolleyes:
RD62
08-21-08, 16:14
What the hell is that mounted under the barrel?

A 40mm pistol?


-RD62
MisterWilson
08-21-08, 16:26
I just realized that he's got no BUIS (front OR rear) and is relying completely on the C-more...

BRILLIANT!
Falboy
08-23-08, 09:08
Definately looks like an AAC to me. What happend to his Dad's .45s? Freak'n Berreta now! Oh well, the last movie had pretty poor description when Dad was say'n what he did to the .45s. I really hate writers that no nothing about guns! But the last one was still entertaining anyhow.
K.L. Davis
08-23-08, 11:04
And a C-more sight.

First COD4, now this. Are C-more's PR people working overtime or what?

They've remained largely in the shadows with regard to being a viable option for optics then *boom* out of the blue here they come again.

Just another movie gun (jamg) -- they can hang whatever they get from product placement programs on them, the only requirement is that it looks cool -- extra points for looking different from the gun in the movie that opened the week before -- it is all about form, and nothing to do with function.

Not saying that C-More is not a good product, just that the mere use of something in a movie, says absolutely nothing as to its function or value... an interesting side note is that C-More did a limited run of 1X4 scopes for the military... way before the current 1X4 scope craze was popular.
MisterWilson
08-23-08, 11:22
But isn't that what technical advisers are for? Aren't there people who's sole purpose is to lend *some* degree of realism to it, someone who's job is to say:

"Hey, stupid, that doesn't look right. Put these on."


ETA: Case & point:

http://semanticdrift.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/kingdom1gv3.jpg
andre3k
08-23-08, 13:29
I guess the technical adviser thought a rear sight to be unimportant.

Is it me or does the new Punisher guy look a lot like Steven Segal.
Stickman
08-23-08, 15:42
But isn't that what technical advisers are for? Aren't there people who's sole purpose is to lend *some* degree of realism to it, someone who's job is to say:

"Hey, stupid, that doesn't look right. Put these on."


ETA: Case & point:

http://semanticdrift.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/kingdom1gv3.jpg



Yes there are supposed to be tech advisers, but it doesn't' mean the producer or director always want to listen. I've done it once, it was interesting to say the least.
Stickman
08-23-08, 15:44
And a C-more sight.

First COD4, now this. Are C-more's PR people working overtime or what?

They've remained largely in the shadows with regard to being a viable option for optics then *boom* out of the blue here they come again.


FN states that they are using C-Mores on all of their weapons, and have solid results. They also added that they weren't using the plastic ones that had issues awhile back.
K.L. Davis
08-23-08, 16:14
I've done it once, it was interesting to say the least.
I was asked to help out with a TV News story (for a station just north of you)... anyway, about the third time I said "that's not how it would really look/happen" I get pulled to the side and told basically "this is a leader for the evening news... we need something flashy yet simple to understand, all we are trying to do is keep the average viewer from switching over to Friends"
rsilvers
08-23-08, 18:50
Even on FutureWeapons they dubbed in fake 'silencer' sounds when they shot the KAC SR25.
target4fun
08-24-08, 01:04
Looks like a movie I need 2 see