PDA

View Full Version : THE LIGHTEST TACTICAL GEAR: WHAT $31,000 CAN BUY YOU



jjackson@tierthreetac
02-19-17, 18:27
This is a little thought experiment where I spec'd the lightest loadout available with the best tactical gear. I drew pretty heavily from my experience as an Infantry Officer in the Marine Corps. It seems like the biggest strides have been made in the armor, helmet, and boots categories. If you guys want I can post the exact gear list here. Here's the full article and infographic. If you want to see all the photos and see it correctly formatted here's the link.


http://www.tierthreetactical.com/the-lightest-tactical-gear-what-31000-can-buy-you/

Your body armor is killing you. In fact, everything you carry is probably trying to kill you. This is because those in the military, police, and contracting professions are carrying more equipment than ever, and it is costing us. This is one area that seems that no matter how much technology we throw at the problem, not much progress is made. There is some good news. I’ve spec’d the best equipment and shown you exactly how much it costs, weighs, and where you can get it. Keep reading to find out just how much cutting edge tactical equipment lightens your load.




This is a topic that continues to be a problem, especially in the military. In fact they’ve spent billions of dollars to modernize our equipment and to their credit they have had some success, but it is not nearly enough. What we’ve done is reduce our weight back to WWII levels.

Historical Soldiers Load Chart
Historical Soldiers Load Chart
You can see from the chart that loads have been creeping up throughout history with a dramatic increase in recent decades, mainly due to the advent of hard armor plates. Now, I’ll be the first to admit that as heavy as armor plates are, it is a nice feeling to know that your plates can take a rifle round without taking you out of the fight. That being said there are several issues with our current armor and more importantly our use of it.

Currently our troops are issued level 4 stand alone armor when they go into combat zones. These plates are massive and heavy. They are roughly 18 lbs for a pair, depending on the size you need. They are also issued side plates, which weigh about 5 lbs a pair. This is a total of 23 pounds of only armor. Granted this armor can stop 30-06 armor piercing, but last time I checked there isn’t a lot of that floating around the battlefield

TAP
The vast majority of threats can be stopped by a level III or III+ plate which are generally rated to stop all modern combat rifle rounds, not armor piercing. The reason troops are stuck with very heavy armor is simple. No commander wants to be the one to make the decision to wear less armor if one of their troops could die because of it. While laudable, that notion in not supported by research.

MOBILITY AS SURVIVABILITY

This study examined the survivability of the modern soldier in a break contact drill, varying the load and then timing them. As you might expect the heavier the load, the slower the troops moved under fire, thus exposing them to fire for a longer period of time. The loads varied from 20lbs – 66lbs. Not only does more weight expose you to fire for longer, it also has other costs as well.

Other studies have looked at factors that heavy loads affect including: road march speed, accuracy, metabolic cost, and many others. This study looked at load effects on US Marines completing a combat task.


Photo of Marsoc Members courtesy of USMC
Researchers recruited the fittest Marines with top marksmanship scores from an infantry battalion. They were asked to complete the maneuver under fire portion of their combat fitness test, which is a test requiring sprinting, casualty carrying, and other combat tasks. It is done annually as part of their fitness testing.

In the study they were loaded with light – heavy loads, and then their marksmanship was measured in a weapons simulator. Marines carrying the heaviest loads had noticeably degraded accuracy. So not only does heavy weight expose people to fire longer, it impacts their ability to accurately shoot back!

CUTTING EDGE EQUIPMENT

We’ve seen that increase in load drastically effects our warfighters, but these kinds of studies only look at current equipment, but what if we specified the lightest acceptable equipment, without worrying about price? Well it’s curious you asked because that’s exactly what I did.

The Lightest Tactical Gear Weight and Cost
The Lightest Tactical Gear Weight and Cost
As we can see the equipment is very expensive at a whopping $31,799. It also is not particularly light coming in at 93 lbs, but that is the best that can currently be done given the specified parameters. Remember, this is for a 3 day operation in a temperate climate. Various external factors would affect the load such as type of operation planned. For an assault load it would be much less, roughly coming in at 60 lbs.

THE BIG WINNERS

A lot of equipment is basically the same weight it always was, I’m looking at you food and water, but some has made drastic improvements. The biggest differences are the following.

Level Three Hard Armor Plates from Chase Tactical
Crye Precision Airframe Helmet
Nike Special Field Boot
Links are affiliate

The plates alone saved roughly 12 lbs from the heavy, level 4 plates specified above. The helmet weighs 2.3 lbs which is roughly half a standard kevlar helmet. Similarly, the Nike SFB boots are less than half the normal weight at 1 lbs for the pair.

The boots and the helmet will have a huge impact on the user because the further you move the weight away from the center of gravity the more tiring it is to carry. So those few pound off of your head and feet will save you a lot of energy.

If you would like to see the full list of every single piece of equipment including NVGs, weapons, suppressor, and pack items. Then sign up for the email list on the right and you will be emailed the exact list with every item specified, but don’t wait to long as I’m not going to send it out forever.

FUTURE EQUIPMENT

The future of equipment carriage isn’t likely to change anytime soon. The army is trying to make exoskeletons that will carry heavy loads for us. They have had some decent tests





This will probably happen, but I doubt that this will be anytime soon. The real solution in the short term is likely to be found in psychology. Haha, I knew my degree would come in handy some day.

Commanders, and those that make the decision what to carry need to do a better job of prioritizing load. It is a critical planning factor just likely planning for water and bullets.

When planning a mission you always consider the amount and type of ammo you are carrying because it keeps you alive, and allows you to accomplish the mission. We need to start thinking about weight planning that way.

If it doesn’t directly contribute to winning then we don’t need it. Lastly, we need to realize that yes, some might die because we chose lesser armor, and that is a tragedy, but you will never know how many lived because they weren’t to tired and broken to win the fight.

If you liked this sweet article, then you should put your email address in the box on the right so you can get these articles emailed to you asap.44118

Defaultmp3
02-19-17, 19:53
This is a little thought experiment where I spec'd the lightest loadout available with the best tactical gear. I drew pretty heavily from my experience as an Infantry Officer in the Marine Corps. It seems like the biggest strides have been made in the armor, helmet, and boots categories. If you guys want I can post the exact gear list here. Here's the full article and infographic.

http://www.tierthreetactical.com/the-lightest-tactical-gear-what-31000-can-buy-you/The plates selected don't protect against M855, as best I can tell. Not a very comparable choice, compared to a set of ESAPI plates, given the differences in protection afforded, particularly since it wouldn't protect against one of the most common 5.56×45mm NATO rounds.

jjackson@tierthreetac
02-19-17, 20:02
That is kind of the point. I contend that we don't need level 4 ESAPI for the vast majority of cases. Personally I know some enemy snipers in AFG/IRQ used armor piercing ammo which is what caused the panic switch to the level four. I also don't recall enemies using M855 ball lol. But on a more serious note I get the concern with that and I'm sure a little heavier plate could stop that. But if your plate stops ak rounds any you are encountering ak's then you've probably got what you need without anything extra. I don't know about you but I hated wearing level 4 everywhere. Thoughts?

Defaultmp3
02-19-17, 21:34
That is kind of the point. I contend that we don't need level 4 ESAPI for the vast majority of cases. Personally I know some enemy snipers in AFG/IRQ used armor piercing ammo which is what caused the panic switch to the level four. I also don't recall enemies using M855 ball lol. But on a more serious note I get the concern with that and I'm sure a little heavier plate could stop that. But if your plate stops ak rounds any you are encountering ak's then you've probably got what you need without anything extra. I don't know about you but I hated wearing level 4 everywhere. Thoughts?I would not trust pure UHMWPE plates to protect against any ammo with a hardened steel penetrator, such as 7N6M.

cd228
02-20-17, 08:14
That is kind of the point. I contend that we don't need level 4 ESAPI for the vast majority of cases. Personally I know some enemy snipers in AFG/IRQ used armor piercing ammo which is what caused the panic switch to the level four. I also don't recall enemies using M855 ball lol. But on a more serious note I get the concern with that and I'm sure a little heavier plate could stop that. But if your plate stops ak rounds any you are encountering ak's then you've probably got what you need without anything extra. I don't know about you but I hated wearing level 4 everywhere. Thoughts?

I don't know about the Marines, but Army wears their plates for safety during training as well. If your plate won't stop an ND from a team member I wouldn't necessarily care for it. Also, Blue on Blue does happen. I'd also point out that we have distroed a lot of 5.56mm to allied nations that can easily fall into the wrong hands like ISIS. Additionally, the plate you picked is not rated for 5.45X39 which last I checked is the current Russian issue and could be expected to be encountered in future European conflicts.

ESAPI doesn't necessarily translate into level 4. I'd pull to the SAPI specs if you can get them and take a look.

Heck an easy way to go is a Tencate 5200 for about 14lbs (4 lbs less than you quote for ESAPIs) for the pair and it eliminates the soft armor requirement (even less weight) and protects against 855A1, 855 and M2A1. It'll still need additional testing for 5.45 though. I'm sure HESCO and the other manufacturers also makes an equivalent.

VARIABLE9
02-20-17, 09:45
Thanks for the article.

jjackson@tierthreetac
02-20-17, 13:42
Thanks for the article.

No problem. Hope it was interesting

Hank6046
02-20-17, 15:39
"Remember, this is for a 3 day operation in a temperate climate. Various external factors would affect the load such as type of operation planned. "
I'll argee with your assessment for the operation described above, but that isn't necessarily where we are going next time.

Also, just I hear good things about the Safariland Delta X as opposed to the Crye.
https://sofrep.com/66323/the-lightest-ballistic-helmet-on-the-market/

jjackson@tierthreetac
02-20-17, 17:05
"Remember, this is for a 3 day operation in a temperate climate. Various external factors would affect the load such as type of operation planned. "
I'll argee with your assessment for the operation described above, but that isn't necessarily where we are going next time.

Also, just I hear good things about the Safariland Delta X as opposed to the Crye.
https://sofrep.com/66323/the-lightest-ballistic-helmet-on-the-market/


Yeah I guess I didn't mean that sentence to indicate a certain area we are likely to fight in just that those kind of conditions require the least amount of gear. I saw that video on the Delta x and it does look pretty sweet. But I like the space between the two shells where air can vent on the Crye, seems like it would really keep your head cooler.

militarymoron
02-20-17, 19:29
Jake, that was an interesting article, but please edit your original post to meet these guidelines:
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?185780-NOTICE-ON-RE-POSTING-OR-LINKING-TO-ARTICLES-(**UPDATED-READ**)

"Product Reviews Written by M4C Forum Member Requirements

Written Product Reviews - Written product reviews must be posted in their entirety on M4Carbine.net with at least half of the article's photos. A link can be provided to additional content available on another site at the end of the article."

Please also remove the link from your signature line:
"External/Coded links to off-site content or sites are not allowed in signature lines, or signature files at the end of every post except in the case of staff, moderators, manufacturers, dealers, industry professional or SME's."

Thanks!

Zim
02-20-17, 21:41
That article would be a lot cooler without the mailing list requirement to see the actual list.

jjackson@tierthreetac
02-21-17, 07:44
Jake, that was an interesting article, but please edit your original post to meet these guidelines:
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?185780-NOTICE-ON-RE-POSTING-OR-LINKING-TO-ARTICLES-(**UPDATED-READ**)

"Product Reviews Written by M4C Forum Member Requirements

Written Product Reviews - Written product reviews must be posted in their entirety on M4Carbine.net with at least half of the article's photos. A link can be provided to additional content available on another site at the end of the article."

Please also remove the link from your signature line:
"External/Coded links to off-site content or sites are not allowed in signature lines, or signature files at the end of every post except in the case of staff, moderators, manufacturers, dealers, industry professional or SME's."

Thanks!

Should be fixed now. Thanks for the heads up.

militarymoron
02-21-17, 08:02
Should be fixed now. Thanks for the heads up.

Appreciated!

jjackson@tierthreetac
02-21-17, 18:47
That article would be a lot cooler without the mailing list requirement to see the actual list.

Part of the reason I don't post it in the article is google penalize's pages with ton's of links like those. But if you'd like you can join the list on the site or DM me and I'll send you the link.