PDA

View Full Version : How tactical are you?



Sam
10-04-08, 06:59
how tactical are you?

My score: +9


The rules are as follows: you start out at zero points. Visualize your carry gun, and start adding or subtracting points according to my list below. Your results are at the bottom of the test.

Polymer frame: +2
Light rail: +2
Laser (guide rod or rail mounted): +2
Chambered in a caliber invented after 1990: +2 (add another +1 if the caliber name contains a three-letter acronym)
High capacity (>10 rounds): +2
“Tactical” engraved or rollmarked anywhere: +3
Official current issue of a major SWAT team or SPECOPS unit: +3 (add another +1 if the manufacturer advertising of the gun includes this information as a selling point)
Mentioned by VPC/Brady as a “cop killer”, “pocket rocket”, or “destructive device”: +2
Product name contains the letter “X”: +2 (add another +1 if it contains the word “extreme”, “xtreme”, or any variation thereof)
Fits into 50% of the stocked holsters in any given gunshop: +2
Used by 50% or more of 18-25 year olds on the range at any given time: +2
Advertising includes ludicrous torture tests, like freezing the gun for a year before boiling it in saltwater and shooting it while submerged in mud: +2
Advertising slogan that implies uncompromising perfection or any variant thereof: +1

Not magazine-fed: -3
No plastic, MIM, titanium, scandium or alloy anywhere in or on the gun: -3
Steel frame: -2
No provisions for a laser, flashlight, optical sight or weather station: -2
Designed before 1980: -2
Designed before 1900: -3
Gloss blue finish: -2
Bright nickel finish: -3
Capable of grip/grip panel removal: -2
Wood grips: -2
Used by 50% or more of the 50+ olds on the range at any given time: -2
Chambered in a caliber that started life as a blackpowder cartridge: -4

Your score:

21-30: You are undoubtedly among the black nylon-clad tactical elite, a killing machine who gets allergic reactions to clothing that doesn’t have a logo related to your carry gun on it. You have Blackhawk on speed dial, and carbon fiber excites you in indecent ways.
11-20: You’re a tactical apprentice, ready to be fitted for wall-climbing boots and duct-taped trauma plate. You consistently spell the brand name of your favorite gun in ALL CAPS on discussion boards.
1-10: You’re a gun rag lemming and marketing victim with hope for redemption if exposed to enough blued steel and walnut. Buy a four-inch S&W Model 19 and call me in the morning.
-1 to -10: Old-fashioned and/or slightly behind the curve. You still think of the Beretta 92F or the Walther P38 as examples of modern gun design, and you still load your carry piece with FMJ because you don’t trust those newfangled Super-Vels.
-11 to -20: You’re probably a single-action shooter who thinks that the newfangled DA revolvers are “a lazy man’s gun.”
-21 to -30: You’re hopelessly untactical–you probably don’t trust percussion locks over the old trusty flintlock.

KintlaLake
10-04-08, 07:07
Best-ever answer to that question, IMO:


I'm about as "tactical as a lawn chair"...

:D

murphy j
10-04-08, 07:10
-14. Old school 'Swenson style' 1911:D.

Robb Jensen
10-04-08, 07:31
I got a 5.

yugolover
10-04-08, 08:19
I carry a S&W model 66. I guess I'm hopeless.

Sam
10-04-08, 08:40
I carry a S&W model 66. I guess I'm hopeless.

Hopelessly untactical at -23 if you're using wooden grips. :)

You could improve your score to around -17 by adding a set of CTC laser grips.:p

Seth Harness
10-04-08, 09:37
-1
When was the sig P220 designed?? that may change my score. HAHA

Master_of_Sparks
10-04-08, 10:30
I scored 4.

I challenge the validity of this test.
It doesn't give any extra points for uber tactical folding knives using G10 scales or black blades, and there are no points for official S.E.A.L. watches.
Of course any point subtraction of a non-custom leather carry holster might offset that.

Robb Jensen
10-04-08, 10:41
-1
When was the sig P220 designed?? that may change my score. HAHA

In the 70's

WallaS
10-04-08, 11:00
I guess the G23 ranks around 19.

The Dumb Gun Collector
10-04-08, 11:01
This was hilarious Sam! Did you invent it?

I got an 18.:D

Seth Harness
10-04-08, 11:03
In the 70's


I see...
-3 then.

yugolover
10-04-08, 11:17
Hopelessly untactical at -23 if you're using wooden grips. :)

You could improve your score to around -17 by adding a set of CTC laser grips.:p
I have a set of the old Target grips on it. So yep I'm hopeless.
Oh I forgot it's a square butt. So it's not even very concealable.

lanceriley
10-04-08, 11:24
darn... I didn't get a single positive score. I got all the negatives..

2 tone 1911. blued and hard chromed.

RD62
10-04-08, 11:58
Depends on if I am carrying the apparently completely "untactical" 1911, or the tactical tupperware G17.

Anywhere from around a +13 to a -22. What if I carry the G17 in a leather OWB thumbreak holster and the 1911 in a kydex thigh rig? What if I do it at the same time!! Does a tactical black hole open and suck me into an abyss? Does the Earth cease to rotate?


:D


-RD62

theJanitor
10-04-08, 12:24
darn... I didn't get a single positive score. I got all the negatives..

2 tone 1911. blued and hard chromed.

me too. my hard chrome.blued government model is two years younger than me :D

lanceriley
10-04-08, 12:37
hey wait a minute... how come the 1911 becomes untactical???

theJanitor
10-04-08, 12:45
if it doesn't say "tactical" in the rollmarks, then it CAN'T be tactical. wait till i find a pic of my Colt Tactical Lightweight Commander (the one with the gold anodized aluminum frame and the high polish nickel slide). it even says "tactical" on the slide. any bad guy would surrender at the sight of that piece ;)

RogerinTPA
10-04-08, 13:11
I scored +11

sgtmajor
10-04-08, 13:25
sorry guys. my 1911 told me that im not alowed to look at this thread. :D

Dedpoet
10-04-08, 13:37
-13. Unless .45ACP started as a black powder cartridge, which I'm not sure of. Then it would be -17...

Federale
10-04-08, 13:38
How many points do you get for posting this question at "M4Carbine.net - The Next Evolution in Tactical Forums"? ;)

I must be one of those black-clad tactical elite, because I'm issued a Glock 22 and a Springfield Professional and a lot of black tactical nylon. In my mind, there's a big difference between being "tactical" out of necessity or prudence and being "tactical" because you think it looks cool and you want to look like the guys who are tactial out of necessity and prudence.

theJanitor
10-04-08, 13:39
sorry guys. my 1911 told me that im not alowed to look at this thread. :D

my 1911 doesn't know what a computer is, i'm hiding her from it.

QuietShootr
10-04-08, 13:52
I carry a S&W model 66. I guess I'm hopeless.

There are a lot more reasons why you're hopeless than your choice of carry gun, amigo.





:D

mattjmcd
10-04-08, 15:23
Oddly enough, my 228 is more tacticool than my newfangled Smith M&P.

GLP Standard
10-04-08, 15:54
I got a +15. Is that a bad thing?

topraider
10-04-08, 16:01
Any points for being proficient with whatever you carry? Any points for maxing the pt test? It's the tactical look that counts, right?

Sam
10-04-08, 16:32
This was hilarious Sam! Did you invent it?

I got an 18.:D

Hell no. It was forwarded to my pistolsmith by a gun magazine writer, former Gunsite (orange) instructor and former cop.

theJanitor
10-04-08, 16:36
I got a +15. Is that a bad thing?

i'm using golf scoring system

GLP Standard
10-04-08, 17:48
i'm using golf scoring system

Then in that case.... :(

Armati
10-04-08, 18:09
Scored a 1! And that is only because my 92F has Crimson Trace grips and is used by Special Forces.

trio
10-04-08, 19:37
sorry guys. my 1911 told me that im not alowed to look at this thread. :D


and my G19 told me, rather than take the test, I needed to slap an M6x on it, some CT grips for "backup" laser usage, and then take it to the range, WITH only G18 magazines, and then shooting it while holding it sideways and saying "What bitch? do sumpin'!"

wichaka
10-04-08, 19:38
The guidelines for the scoring are seriously flawed............. ouch!

fabulous45s
10-04-08, 22:49
If my math is correct, my Browning Hi Power scores me a -11.

randyman_ar
10-05-08, 07:14
-14 :eek: .... If I sharpen the ends of my fire starting sticks(low light fighting), maybe I could use them as a back-up to my primary (medium size rock in right front pocket). Would I get extra points?

Army Chief
10-05-08, 07:35
A high score on this particular survey would make me seriously rethink my priorities.

I would much rather be competent and well-armed than trendy and cool.

Chief

bushy
10-05-08, 21:54
This is making me think about trading in my 1842 Springfield or could I put a RAS or maybe an Eotech on it and gain some points?:)

noops
10-06-08, 16:15
-13 for my 1911.

Of course since it is an Ed Brown "Special Forces" (a name I truly hate, but I love the gun), there should be a +2 or something. I didn't have a single positive score.

QuietShootr
10-06-08, 20:00
Any points for being proficient with whatever you carry? Any points for maxing the pt test? It's the tactical look that counts, right?

To add insult to injury, that sick **** yugolover runs 6-10 miles a day, often with a ruck. And the prick insists on carrying that gigantic Model 66 and two speedloaders.

I got nothin'.






:D

BAC
10-06-08, 22:21
My M1911A1 earned me a -15, provided I know my gun facts.


-B