View Full Version : Magpul bipod. M-LOK vs picatinny
Looking to buy a simple inexpensive bipod that will be only be mounted at the range. Any experience on which system gives good stability and easy detachment when needed? Thanks
I'd probably do picatinny and just leave a small section of rail on my handguard. M-Loc was never made to use like a QD coupling.
Renegade04
04-24-19, 16:38
I'd probably do picatinny and just leave a small section of rail on my handguard. M-Loc was never made to use like a QD coupling.
I agree that using a short picatinny rail section for quickly attaching/detaching a bipod is a good idea. I also agree that there is no QD coupling designed for M-LOK. That, however, is not important to everyone. Personally, I have the MAGPUL M-LOK bipod in use on one of my ARs and it stays mounted. That was the entire intent for going with that bipod. If I wanted a QD type of setup with a bipod, I would have gone another route, but that would require a short picatinny rail section, an QD bipod adapter, and bipod. There is added expense to that option should I have wanted to go in that direction. Fortunately, the MAGPUL M-LOK bipod is lightweight and does not impede the use of the AR without the bipod deployed.
https://i.imgur.com/lTvMOEt.jpg
gunnerblue
04-24-19, 17:54
I have the Mlok model on a Magpul chassis and it is steady. I leave it on constantly and agree that Mlok is not the best QD option. For quickly detaching at the range, I’d go with Picatinny.
lordmorgul
04-24-19, 18:47
Pick a different bipod. I have both the m-lok and picatinny Magpul bipods and it’s simply not meant for a QD platform use. It installs and stays. Yes you could probably replace the screws for the pic version with a QD cam but they weren’t meant for it.
Andrew - Lancaster, CA
NRA Life Member, CRPA member, Calguns.net contributor, CGF / SAF / FPC / CCRKBA / GOA / NAGR / NRA-ILA contributor, USCCA member - Support your defenders!
Buy the ARMS version and add a qd lever to it. Then you can just securely attach it to the rail section and easily remove it later.
dontshakepandas
04-25-19, 07:42
How many slots/what size rail does the picatinny version need?
Buy the ARMS version and add a qd lever to it. Then you can just securely attach it to the rail section and easily remove it later.
That will work for QD, but that makes a $110 bipod a $170+ bipod. Not sure if that price range opens up the options to other brands though.
I recently bought the M-LOK version with the intent of occasionally moving it around, but think it will stay on a 15" rail. If I had it to do over I think I would prefer the 1913 version since it would ultimately be more flexible.
Just got a YouTube update from Magpul. If this had popped up a few weeks ago I would have waited.
https://youtu.be/usdV3wNIxAU
Looking to buy a simple inexpensive bipod that will be only be mounted at the range. Any experience on which system gives good stability and easy detachment when needed? Thanks
Get a short picatinny rail mounted on the hand guard. Use a Harris bipod with a picatinny rail QD lever mount.
elephantrider
04-25-19, 17:23
Buy the ARMS version and add a qd lever to it. Then you can just securely attach it to the rail section and easily remove it later.
^This right here is probably your best quick on/off solution for the magpul bipod. The "Magpul Bipod for A.R.M.S. 17S Style" with a Midwest Industries 17S QD lever, and an m-lok picatinny section on the rail should work great. The MI QD lever is the only one that I've used that actually clamps down tight, and can be removed easily with finger pressure. Other QD levers take way too much lever to release easily.
The only other true QD option would be to get the picatinny version bipod and attack it to a Kinect M-lok QD rail. Having played with the Kinect, it seems like it is designed to work best on rails with a wide flat area around the M-lok slot, such as the Geissele SMR type rails. It didn't fit so well on my ALG EMR, or a couple other slim rails.
I’ve been looking at the Magpul bipods, I may go with the one for sling studs. Thanks for the info
Magpul release a new YouTube video yesterday. Looks like they a new QD Magpul bipod is in development. I will just wait for it
Buy the ARMS version and add a qd lever to it. Then you can just securely attach it to the rail section and easily remove it later.
^ ^ ^ ^ This. get the Magpul bipod that is the ARMS version, then get the American Defense Mfg AD-170-S QD base (or anybody else's "170S" base, S for "short"). then attach the Magpul bipod to the AD QD adapter, and voila: QD to your 5-slot pic rail section. and you can switch it to others guns rails that have the short pic rail segment.
ETA:
or the Midwest Industries equivalent, as mentioned a couple posts above.
Personally I'll echo what others have stated, my choice is MAG951 (https://www.magpul.com/products/magpul-bipod-for-a-r-m-s--17s-style?ProductColor=VO343) Magpul® Bipod for A.R.M.S.® 17S Style, coupled with the BTC-Pro Clamp (https://www.reallyrightstuff.com/BTC-Pro-Clamp-for-Atlas-Bipod) as it is designed for both the Nato Picatinny Standard and the RRS 1.5" Dovetail Standard. I can use the same on my carbines with Picatinny rail sections and my bolt gun with an ARCA adapter.
https://www.magpul.com/Files/Files/Images/Products/Stocks/Accessories/MAG951/GALLERY/BLK/MAG951_BLK_01.png?bgcolor=F5F5F5
https://www.reallyrightstuff.com/assets/images/products/BTC-Pro-Clamp-for-Atlas-Bipod.main-8.jpg?resizeid=6&resizeh=1000&resizew=1000
Doc Safari
05-14-19, 13:01
I was ready to order an M-LOK rail with the stud that allows mounting of a Harris bipod--then I discovered that it's aluminum.
Is it advisable to have an aluminum bipod mount? I'd think that stud would wear quickly.
titsonritz
05-14-19, 18:12
I'd probably do picatinny and just leave a small section of rail on my handguard. M-Loc was never made to use like a QD coupling.
Say who?
https://kineticdg.com/product/kinectmlok-3-slot-single-mlok-picatinny-section/
Say who?
https://kineticdg.com/product/kinectmlok-3-slot-single-mlok-picatinny-section/
Looks like another fix looking for a problem that doesn't exist to me.
Hard to say. The way my bipods hook onto regular steel studs, there isn't much to it as far as wear and tear is concerned. I've had similar concerns about QD sling attachment points in Al rails, but never personally had a problem (yet).
I was ready to order an M-LOK rail with the stud that allows mounting of a Harris bipod--then I discovered that it's aluminum.
Is it advisable to have an aluminum bipod mount? I'd think that stud would wear quickly.
lordmorgul
05-18-19, 08:55
I was ready to order an M-LOK rail with the stud that allows mounting of a Harris bipod--then I discovered that it's aluminum.
Is it advisable to have an aluminum bipod mount? I'd think that stud would wear quickly.
I have this. The coating handles a lot of abuse actually so it’s not nearly as soft as bare aluminum. It will show wear if you’re not loosening the bipod as much as you can while doing it but it will take a lot of mount and dismounts.
Magpul M-LOK Bipod Mount https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ORZEQZY/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_X4a4CbHREM3JP
Andrew - Lancaster, CA
NRA Life Member, CRPA member, Calguns.net contributor, CGF / SAF / FPC / CCRKBA / GOA / NAGR / NRA-ILA contributor, USCCA member - Support your defenders!
lordmorgul
05-18-19, 09:00
Say who?
https://kineticdg.com/product/kinectmlok-3-slot-single-mlok-picatinny-section/
Clever but not for bipods per their own warning.
And if not for bipods... I wonder how these would hold up to drop tests. It’s interesting but probably not a hard use solution.
Andrew - Lancaster, CA
NRA Life Member, CRPA member, Calguns.net contributor, CGF / SAF / FPC / CCRKBA / GOA / NAGR / NRA-ILA contributor, USCCA member - Support your defenders!
titsonritz
05-18-19, 13:27
Clever but not for bipods per their own warning.
And if not for bipods... I wonder how these would hold up to drop tests. It’s interesting but probably not a hard use solution.
Andrew - Lancaster, CA
NRA Life Member, CRPA member, Calguns.net contributor, CGF / SAF / FPC / CCRKBA / GOA / NAGR / NRA-ILA contributor, USCCA member - Support your defenders!
Not for bipods while shooting harder recoiling weapons, the warning reads...
**NOT RECOMMENDED FOR USE AS A BIPOD ATTACHMENT POINT ON CALIBERS LARGER THAN 5.56 and certain bolt action firearms. Due to loading the Bipod, the QD Kinect system can disengage from recoil.***
They also make a Harris Bipod stud version with the same warning, so it clearing intended for bipod use.
https://kineticdg.com/product/kinectmlok-harris-bipod-mount/
But yeah, a legit point, I wonder how much abuse they would take. My thoughts are to use one on a couple rifle with M-Lok rails that I don't keep bipod on but want to use one temporarily for sighting in purposes.
Not for bipods while shooting harder recoiling weapons, the warning reads...
**NOT RECOMMENDED FOR USE AS A BIPOD ATTACHMENT POINT ON CALIBERS LARGER THAN 5.56 and certain bolt action firearms. Due to loading the Bipod, the QD Kinect system can disengage from recoil.***
They also make a Harris Bipod stud version with the same warning, so it clearing intended for bipod use.
https://kineticdg.com/product/kinectmlok-harris-bipod-mount/
But yeah, a legit point, I wonder how much abuse they would take. My thoughts are to use one on a couple rifle with M-Lok rails that I don't keep bipod on but want to use one temporarily for sighting in purposes.Interesting. I noticed the Harris version actually says up to .308 on the warning.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Looking to buy a simple inexpensive bipod that will be only be mounted at the range. Any experience on which system gives good stability and easy detachment when needed? Thanks
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210520/d614773b67fcb0def2b37b9cb8778cf3.jpg
Magpul QR Rail Grabber. For picatinny rail or A.R.M.S footprint models
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.