View Full Version : New Winchester 9mm Army round
Saw some of this at Academy yesterday?
https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2019/4/23/m1152-m1153-the-army-s-new-9-mm-luger-loads/
I wonder when we will see specific ammunition for the new sub-guns.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SeriousStudent
11-24-19, 13:55
Sigh. Winchester currently has some of the shittiest quality control around. More great news for the Joes actually carrying pistols.
Why didn't they just order a metric butt-load of Federal 147-grain hST and call it good? But I guess no one would have made Colonel that way.
The contract for the pistol required an ammo contract. That’s what Sig selected.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The new hollow point ammo shoots and functions the M17 and M18 better than the new and old ball.
SeriousStudent
11-24-19, 15:10
The new hollow point ammo shoots and functions the M17 and M18 better than the new and old ball.
I am really, really glad to hear that. Winchester ammo has really worried me of late. If they have a good handle on QC for these loads, that's great news for the folks using it.
I guess we will see plenty of xm1152 and xm1153 soon then.
The new military 9mm Winchester ammunition will be made to milspec quality standards and not to stock holder standards.
Having said that I bought 500 once fired military Winchester 9mm cases and thought the brass was of good quality.
"M1152 with the 115-gr. bullet was at 1326 f.p.s."
That's +P+ velocity, e.g. Federal 9BPLE or the Winchester or Remington equivalent. Zowie!
I wonder if M882 / Q4318 is going away? Hope not. That's what I run in my "kinetic platforms."
And it is indeed true that once fired Q4318 brass is good stuff. I've reloaded it. I don't bother with it any longer, because you have to swage out the primer pocket crimp.
"M1152 with the 115-gr. bullet was at 1326 f.p.s."
That's +P+ velocity, e.g. Federal 9BPLE or the Winchester or Remington equivalent. Zowie!
I am highly skeptical that anyone could get that velocity with M1152 from a standard pistol length barrel (even though the article says it was from a 4.7 inch barrel).
Joe Mamma
I am highly skeptical that anyone could get that velocity with M1152 from a standard pistol length barrel (even though the article says it was from a 4.7 inch barrel).
I'm not. That's neither difficult nor unprecedented.
I wonder if we will see an epidemic of broken pistols in a few years like we do with the M9. Every regional and national event I attend has M9s break their locking blocks. I know a guy who has broken 3, though that is probably a freak string of events for the individual.
Not unreasonable velocities
"In our tests in 1985, XM882 propelled a 124-gr. round-nose FMJ out of the 5" barrel of an M9 at an average of 1273 f.p.s., delivering 446 ft.-lbs. of energy at 15 ft. Using an Oehler Model 43 and firing the new ammunition out of a 4.7"-barreled P320-M17, M1152 with the 115-gr. bullet was at 1326 f.p.s. and 449 ft.-lbs. of energy, while the M1153 clocked 962 f.p.s. with 302 ft.-lbs., both at 15 ft."
So a 124 FMJ at 1273, a 115 FMJ at 1326 or a 147 HP at 962.
tacticaldesire
11-26-19, 10:56
So I'm confused.
I thought they had a contract with sig for ammo. Is winchester making it too?
I am not sure Sig has the capacity to fulfill a military contract, likely they are subbing at least some out to Winchester.
Steve Shannon
11-26-19, 21:42
So I'm confused.
I thought they had a contract with sig for ammo. Is winchester making it too?
Paragraphs 2-4 of the article answer this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CAMagnussen
11-27-19, 08:45
I wonder why the Army did not stick with the 147gr hardball they had been using, the stuff that was basically loaded to +P. I bought a slew of it a year or so ago from Brownells, in original Army GI sealed cans, etc.
You know just dawned on me that by going with a 115 grain they are throwing all pretense of sticking to the NATO standard out the window. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing.
ramairthree
11-27-19, 10:47
Maybe they have a range in some weird combination of the highest elevation with the least dense air but very hot like a mountain on the equator or something.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.