scdrnr
01-29-20, 15:37
Hi, this is my first post here.
I'm slowly building my first AR-15 piece by piece. Unfortunately I was sent an HK416 upper instead of the regular AR-15 upper that I ordered and since I live in a country where parts are both expensive and hard to come by I can not just return it so if it's possible I want to include it in my build instead of going through all the hassle aquiring a new one.
I'm aware the HK416 uses a piston and rod whereas the AR-15 uses direct impingement. I haven't managed to get hold of any blueprints or drawings with measurements of the AR-15 upper so basically I've been restricted to studying pictures and comparing with the HK416 upper...
The differences I've noticed so far is:
* The HK416 rail sits a bit taller
* The bulge on the forward left side is more rounded than on the AR-15 upper
* Longer treading towards the barrel, metric 1.5mm treads
* The hole on the front face where the piston rod is supposed to sit is shaped different and has a treaded removable bushing
I have a standard M16/M4 full auto bolt carrier which slides in nice + mil-spec full auto trigger group and an M16A1 lower. Upper and lower mates well and from what I've read the trigger group should also work fine.
A little help needed here!
1.) Will my HK416 upper work with regular DI AR-15 internals if I machine the piston rod hole to fit a standard gas tube instead?
2.) Could someone please measure the diameter of the x-shaped hole in the front of an AR-15 upper or provide drawings with measurements of it?
3.) Will I experience any other problems, except for the metric treads on the barrel connection? I'm mostly thinking about the extra length of the HK416 upper barrel extension... Are there readily available "conversion nuts" or do I have to have one made?
I tried to capture as much details as possible. Please have a look at the pictures below and please advise!
Kind regards
/scdrnr
I'm slowly building my first AR-15 piece by piece. Unfortunately I was sent an HK416 upper instead of the regular AR-15 upper that I ordered and since I live in a country where parts are both expensive and hard to come by I can not just return it so if it's possible I want to include it in my build instead of going through all the hassle aquiring a new one.
I'm aware the HK416 uses a piston and rod whereas the AR-15 uses direct impingement. I haven't managed to get hold of any blueprints or drawings with measurements of the AR-15 upper so basically I've been restricted to studying pictures and comparing with the HK416 upper...
The differences I've noticed so far is:
* The HK416 rail sits a bit taller
* The bulge on the forward left side is more rounded than on the AR-15 upper
* Longer treading towards the barrel, metric 1.5mm treads
* The hole on the front face where the piston rod is supposed to sit is shaped different and has a treaded removable bushing
I have a standard M16/M4 full auto bolt carrier which slides in nice + mil-spec full auto trigger group and an M16A1 lower. Upper and lower mates well and from what I've read the trigger group should also work fine.
A little help needed here!
1.) Will my HK416 upper work with regular DI AR-15 internals if I machine the piston rod hole to fit a standard gas tube instead?
2.) Could someone please measure the diameter of the x-shaped hole in the front of an AR-15 upper or provide drawings with measurements of it?
3.) Will I experience any other problems, except for the metric treads on the barrel connection? I'm mostly thinking about the extra length of the HK416 upper barrel extension... Are there readily available "conversion nuts" or do I have to have one made?
I tried to capture as much details as possible. Please have a look at the pictures below and please advise!
Kind regards
/scdrnr