Law Tactical Competition?

[RMike89]

This seems interesting, integrating the folding mechanism straight into the lower and at a price point where you get the entire encapsulated system vs. just the folding mechanism:

https://www.primaryarms.com/17-design-integrated-folding-ar-15-lower-receiver

What do ya'll think?

[Five_Point_Five_Six]

Proprietary buffer. Hard pass.

Also not a fan of being a guinea pig for lowers from unheard of companies.

[RMike89]

Apparently the company responsible for this lower also was the driving force behind Shield Arms 15 round g48 mag...

[ViniVidivici]

From what little I can see, the latch doesn't look that tough. Doesn't allow you to ever change your mind about it either.

If I wanted folding, I'd go LAW long before that.

[Diamondback]

I like a little more tail-end weight in my AR's for balance. Sticking to LAW unless they redesign it to use a standard CAR, A5 or Rifle buffer and beef up that latch.

[munchie3409]

New Frontier also offers a lower with a folding mechanism. I thought about buying one to compare it to the Law Tactical. I owned Law Tactical and I like them, but they are expensive for what they are, for my needs. Law Tactical as a company is local to me and I like to suppose local companies, but I'm not in love with their product.

[1986s4]

How heavy is the LAW folder?

[officerX]

How heavy is the LAW folder?

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210112/ee613dfc935249b19a00cd9ea22ac2bc.png



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro