PDA

View Full Version : Return Of The M193 Clones



Molon
08-17-22, 15:09
Return Of The M193 Clones

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/223_cartridge_drawing_005-2200622.jpg


clone: one that appears to be a copy of an original form



Part 1

Genuine US Military M193 can no longer be sold to civilians, thanks to the Clinton Administration. The ammunition that is sold on the commercial market with some form of “M193” in its nomenclature is often referred to as an “M193 clone” because it “appears to be a copy” of genuine M193, but we generally have no idea what specifications of MIL-C-9963 that this ammunition has passed, or has even been tested for.

Genuine M193 must be tested for and pass all of the specifications laid out in the mil-spec, MIL-C-9963. The required areas of testing included in MIL-C-9963 range from velocity, accuracy, chamber pressure and port pressure to waterproofing, temperature stability, bullet extraction, case hardness, fouling and much more.

M193 is loaded with a 55 grain FMJ bullet with a cannelure. The bullet itself, must meet required specifications in order to be used in genuine M193 ammunition. For example, the specification for the thickness of the gilding metal jacket of the bullet is 0.021" with a tolerance of - 0.002". For comparison, the jacket of Hornady’s 55 grain FMJ bullet has a thickness of approximately 0.028”.

Jacket thickness can have a significant effect on terminal ballistic properties, particularly that of fragmentation. Even the composition of the copper alloy used for the jacket and the lead used for the slug must meet mil-spec requirements for genuine M193.

Genuine M193 can only be charged with powder that has been specifically approved by the US Military for use in this cartridge. If the ammunition in question is not loaded with one of the approved powders, it is not genuine M193 and naturally we have no way of determining what powder was used in a load simply by visual inspection.

Genuine M193 will have the annealing iris visible on the shoulder and neck portion of the case. It will also will have crimped and sealed primers. Genuine M193 has a crimped case mouth along with sealant at the case mouth.

In 2010, I posted an in-depth evaluation of four different brands of M193 clones that were readily available at that time. (Attack of the (M193) Clones (https://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=16&t=511804&tl=Attack-of-the-M193-Clones))

For this article, I evaluated recent production lots of the same four brands of M193 clones (though not necessarily the same manufacturers.)


Winchester M193

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/winchester_m183_box_2021-2210446.jpg

This lot of Winchester M193 is loaded in Lake City brass with a 2021 headstamp. The case-head stamp exhibits the octal station identifiers found on Lake City SCAMP machinery. The brass cases have the annealing iris still visible. The rounds are charged with ball powder.

The primer pockets are crimped, but do not have any sealant. The case mouths are also crimped, but also have no sealant.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/winchester_m193_headstamp_2021-2210472.jpg


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lake_city_scamp_octal__numbering_03_resi-2209035.jpg


The lot number for this lot of Winchester M193 is pictured below. The “WLC21” in the prefix of the lot number indicates that this lot of Winchester M193 was manufactured at Lake City in 2021 under Winchester “management.”


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/winchester_m193_lot_number_2021-2210503.jpg






Federal XM193

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/federal_xm193_box_2021-2210443.jpg


This lot of Federal XM193 is loaded in Lake City brass with a 2021 headstamp. The case-head stamp exhibits the octal station identifiers found on Lake City SCAMP machinery. The brass cases have the annealing iris still visible. The rounds are charged with ball powder.

As with the Winchester M193, the primer pockets of this lot of Federal XM193 are crimped, but do not have any sealant. The case mouths of this lot of Federal XM193 are also crimped, but also have no sealant.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/federal_xm193_headstamp_2021-2209028.jpg



The lot number for this lot of Federal XM193 is pictured below. The “WLC21” in the prefix of the lot number indicates that this lot of Federal XM193 was manufactured at Lake City in 2021 under Winchester “management.”


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/federal_xm193_lot_number_2021-2210512.jpg



IMI M193

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_m193_box_2021_resized-2210444.jpg


This lot of IMI M193 is loaded in IMI brass with a 2021 headstamp. The annealing iris is visible and the rounds are charged with ball powder. The primer pockets are crimped and sealed and the case mouths are also crimped and sealed.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_headstamp_2021-2210584.jpg





Prvi Partizan (PPU) M193

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/ppu_m193_box_2020-2210445.jpg



The PPU M193 brass has a 2020 headstamp and the annealing iris is visible. The primer pockets are crimped and sealed, as are the case mouths and the ammunition is charged with ball powder.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/ppu_m193_headstamp_2020_01-2210797.jpg



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/four_m193_clones_2021_01_resized-2211131.jpg


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/pulled_m193_bullets_2021_02-2211143.jpg


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/m193_clone_2021_powder_01-2211151.jpg




Part 2

Aside from aspects of M193 clones that can be assessed by visual inspection, the two main aspects of M193 clones that we can assess via live fire testing to determine if an M193 clone adheres to the US mil-spec are velocity and accuracy (technically precision). The velocity specification for M193 as cited in MIL-C-9963F states:

"The average velocity of the sample cartridges, conditioned at 72 degrees, plus or minus 2 degrees Fahrenheit (F), shall be 3165 feet per second (ft/sec), plus or minus 40 ft/sec, at 78 feet from the muzzle of the weapon. The standard deviation of the velocities shall not exceed 40 ft/sec."

The velocity specification is for a 20” test barrel. Depending on multiple variables, this velocity specification equates to a muzzle velocity of approximately 3270 ft/sec, plus or minus 40 ft/sec.

As an aside, after reading the above specification, some of you may be wondering, “Why 78 feet from the muzzle?” The answer to that question is that this specification is simply an historical hold-over from the days when “circuit” chronographs (e.g. Le Boulenge Chronograph and the Aberdeen Chronograph) were used at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Frankford Arsenal and Springfield Armory. These types of chronographs required a significant distance between their first and second screens to produce accurate results.

As an example, when using the Boulenge Chronograph, the first screen of the chronograph was placed 3 feet in front of the muzzle and the second screen was placed 150 feet beyond the first screen. For those of you who might not be aware of the following fact; chronographs determine the velocity of the bullet at a point that is midway between the first and the second screen (i.e. not at the location of the first screen). Therefore, with the above spacing, the velocity of the bullet is determined for a point that is 75 feet from the first screen. So, add the three feet (from the muzzle to the first screen) to the 75 feet (the midway point of the screens) to obtain the “78 feet from the muzzle” distance.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/chronograph_spacing_44-1845418.jpg


I chronographed the four M193 clones evaluated for this article from a semi-automatic AR-15 with a chrome-lined, NATO chambered 20” Colt barrel with a 1:7” twist.

Chronographing was conducted using an Oehler 35-P chronograph with “proof screen” technology. The Oehler 35P chronograph is actually two chronographs in one package that takes two separate chronograph readings for each shot and then has its onboard computer analyze the data to determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two readings. If there is, the chronograph “flags” the shot to let you know that the data is invalid. There was no invalid data flagged during this testing.

The velocities listed in the table below are muzzle velocities as calculated from the instrumental velocities using Oehler’s Ballistic Explorer software program. Each string of fire consisted of 10 rounds over the chronograph.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/oehler_chronograph_32-1342454.jpg


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/oehler_computer_02-1342452.jpg



Each round was single-loaded and cycled into the chamber from a magazine fitted with a single-load follower. The bolt locked-back after each shot allowing the chamber to cool in between each shot. This technique was used to mitigate the possible influence of “chamber-soak” on velocity data. Each new shot was fired in a consistent manner after hitting the bolt release. Atmospheric conditions were monitored and recorded using a Kestrel 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/kestrel_4000_21-1342442.jpg


Atmospheric conditions

Temperature: 72 degrees F
Humidity: 78%
Barometric pressure: 30.02 inches of Hg
Elevation: 950 feet above sea level


The muzzle velocities of the four M193 clones are listed in the table below, along with the standard deviations and coefficients of variation.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/return_of_the_m193_clones_muzzle_velocit-2210949.jpg



continued in the next post . . .

Molon
08-17-22, 15:09
For those of you who might not be familiar with the coefficient of variation (CV), it is the standard deviation, divided by the mean (average) muzzle velocity and then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. It allows for the comparison of the uniformity of velocity between loads in different velocity spectrums; e.g. 77 grain loads running around 2,650 fps compared to 55 grain loads running around 3,250 fps.

The mil-spec for M193 allows for a coefficient of variation of approximately 1.2%, while one of my best 77 grain OTM hand-loads, with a muzzle velocity of 2639 PFS and a standard deviation of 4 FPS, has a coefficient of variation of 0.15%.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/stnadard_deviation_of_4_fps_01-1342455.jpg



For comparison to the velocities of the M193 clones evaluated for this article, the next table shows the muzzle velocities of the four M193 clones that I evaluated in 2010 (also fired from a 20” Colt barrel.)


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/m193_chronograph_chart_01-1426669-2210773.jpg





Part 3

The US accuracy specification for M193 cited in MIL-C-9963F is as follows:

“The average of the mean radii of all targets of the sample cartridges, fired at 200 yards, shall not exceed 2.0 inches.”

These averages are from 10-shot groups fired from machine rested, bolt-actioned, heavy test barrels. All things being equal this specification equates to a mean radius of 1 inch at 100 yards (the distance at which I tested this ammunition).

I conducted an accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the four M193 clones following my usual protocol. This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any Group Reduction Techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Also, a control group was fired from the test-rifle used in the evaluation using match-grade, hand-loaded ammunition; in order to demonstrate the capability of the barrel. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The barrel used in the evaluation was free-floated. The free-float handguards of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was used. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_walther_ar15_on_bench_03-2211995.jpg



The Wind Probe . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/wind_probe_2016_01_framedb-1342522.jpg



The test vehicle for this evaluation was one of my semi-automatic precision AR-15s with a 20” stainless-steel Lothar Walther barrel. The barrel has a 223 Wylde chamber with a 1:8” twist.



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_walther_barrel_21_resized-1999713.jpg



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_barrel_crown_02_resized-1297385-1342445.jpg



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_walther_barrel_free_floated_05-12-1342446.jpg



Prior to firing the M193 clones, I fired a 10-shot control group using match-grade hand-loads topped with the Sierra 52 grain MatchKing. That group had an extreme spread of 0.64”.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/52_smk_control_group_for_rotmc_lothar_ba-2211589.jpg




Prvi Partizan (PPU) M193

Three 10-shot groups of the PPU M193 ammunition fired consecutively from the Lothar Walther barreled AR-15 at a distance of 100 yards had the following extreme spreads:

3.00”

2.28”

3.48”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 2.92”. I over-layed the three 10-shot groups on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius of the 30-shot composite group was 0.80”.

The smallest 10-shot group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/ppu_m193_2020_10_shot_group_at_100_yards-2211631.jpg


The 30-shot composite group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/ppu_m193_2020_30_shot_composite_group_01-2211650.jpg



Winchester M193

Three 10-shot groups of the Winchester M193 ammunition fired consecutively from the Lothar Walther barreled AR-15 at a distance of 100 yards had the following extreme spreads:

2.21”

2.65”

2.09”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 2.32”. I over-layed the three 10-shot groups on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius of the 30-shot composite group was 0.72”.


The smallest 10-shot group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/winchester_m193_2021_10_shot_group_at_10-2211704.jpg


The 30-shot composite group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/winchester_m193_2021_30_shot_composite_g-2211723.jpg



Federal XM193


Three 10-shot groups of the Federal XM193 ammunition fired consecutively from the Lothar Walther barreled AR-15 at a distance of 100 yards had the following extreme spreads:

2.36”

2.67”

1.77”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 2.27”. I over-layed the three 10-shot groups on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius of the 30-shot composite group was 0.66”.


The smallest 10-shot group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/federal_xm193_2021_smallest_10_shot_grou-2211782.jpg


The 30-shot composite group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/federal_xm193_30_shot_comosite_group_001-2211907.jpg




IMI M193


Three 10-shot groups of the IMI M193 ammunition fired consecutively from the Lothar Walther barreled AR-15 at a distance of 100 yards had the following extreme spreads:

1.84”

2.86”

2.16”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 2.29”. I over-layed the three 10-shot groups on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius of the 30-shot composite group was 0.64”.


The smallest 10-shot group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_m193_2021_228b_01_measured_01-2211933.jpg


The 30-shot composite group . . .

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_m193_lot_228b_30_shot_composite_01-2211945.jpg



The table below summarizes the accuracy/precision results for this article.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/return_of_the_m193_accuracy_results_tabl-2211974.jpg



For comparison, the next table summarizes the accuracy/precision results from the 2010 evaluation.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/m193_clone_accuracy_chart_02-1426653-2211978.jpg




…..

ryr8828
08-17-22, 15:27
Very interesting, thanks.

I've got a mile of 193 but I bought it a decade ago before I retired, wanted to have enough to shoot until I'm gone. Mostly federal, imi, and prvi. Whatever was on sale at the time.

Stickman
08-17-22, 15:38
Molon, I love you, no homo. On a serious note, thank you. Your posts and knowledge offer a lot of help to people. Sadly, lots of it will be used by people who don't understand it, so they misquote portions and take the rest out of context, but I guess that is just the magic of the internet.


Seriously, thanks for the post.

markm
08-17-22, 15:45
To me, the critical M193 characteristic is the jacket thickness. I get the other variables, but if you can get an M193 spec bullet, you can drive it fast enough with shelf powder to get a good enough clone.

I actually have a "Reference" box of M193 someone from Arfcom gave me years back. I'm too silly to open it up though.

TMS951
08-17-22, 17:34
Another great post! Thanks for coming and posting here again.

I liked this comparison. Good stuff.

It would be cool to see the same thing with various mk262 clones form IMI and magtech and the likes.

gunnerblue
08-17-22, 17:44
Good to see you back, Molon. As usual, excellent posting and thank you for the hard work.

gaijin
08-17-22, 17:53
Excellent presentation.
Thank you.

Hammer_Man
08-17-22, 18:47
Awesome post!! I appreciate the time and effort you put into making this presentation for the community.

JediGuy
08-17-22, 20:08
Thanks!

Apparently, IMI does well in 55gr clone form as well as the 77gr.

Krazykarl
08-17-22, 21:23
Molon,

Sinclair front rest? What top is on it?

Thanks again for a well designed and presented comparison.

Rmorris
08-18-22, 07:15
I find this quite useful. I had planned to make a purchase soon. This reaffirms my choice. Has a similar m855 or m262 comparison been done recently? Would you compare pmc’s x Tac clone as well? I could do the first part, but the barrel would not be the same. I’ll happily fund the ammo.

Circle_10
08-18-22, 07:54
I find this quite useful. I had planned to make a purchase soon. This reaffirms my choice. Has a similar m855 or m262 comparison been done recently? Would you compare pmc’s x Tac clone as well? I could do the first part, but the barrel would not be the same. I’ll happily fund the ammo.


I’d be curious to see some numbers on *current production* X-Tac as well. It’s what I have been buying the most of lately due to cost. However it wouldn’t generally be my first choice otherwise because in late 2021 I bumped into a guy I know at the range and he had one of those Magnetospeed barrel mounted chronographs so we decided to try it on my 20” AR with some 55gr X-Tac and the velocities were quite disappointing- mostly barely getting over the 3000fps mark, with some shots even coming in in below 3000. Granted it was cold out but even then that seemed quite poor for supposed M193-spec ammo out of a 20” barrel.
I’ve heard some talk that current production X-Tac is more in line with proper M193 velocities however, but can’t personally substantiate that.

Disciple
08-18-22, 14:50
Thank you.

Molon
08-18-22, 15:14
Molon,

Sinclair front rest? What top is on it?



Yes. It's currently wearing the Sinclair gen II windage top

...

Swstock
08-18-22, 18:40
Wow Im happy to see a Molon post here.

Molon
08-20-22, 13:25
Molon, I love you, no homo. On a serious note, thank you. Your posts and knowledge offer a lot of help to people. Sadly, lots of it will be used by people who don't understand it, so they misquote portions and take the rest out of context, but I guess that is just the magic of the internet. Seriously, thanks for the post.

Muchas gracias. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/biggrinbandit-1970702.gif

...

Straight Shooter
08-20-22, 13:31
Molon-
Any thoughts or tests of the German MEN M193?

Wake27
08-20-22, 13:54
Molon-
Any thoughts or tests of the German MEN M193?

I’ve been debating getting some of that for a while. Just hard to justify the price over PMC Bronze for blasting stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Straight Shooter
08-20-22, 19:34
I’ve been debating getting some of that for a while. Just hard to justify the price over PMC Bronze for blasting stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Its supposed to be real deal German issue 193. Ive been shooting it for several years, chrono'ed like it should and never a problem.
If Molon has tested it or knows more about it than me, Id like to hear his thoughts.
Ill tell you this..its the shiniest ammo Ive ever seen, not that THAT is important, but the brass is outstanding. I give mine to a guy that reloads and he loves it.
Ive got a few thousand rounds of it, it did get scarce for awhile, but its been back awhile now.

Molon
08-21-22, 08:50
Molon-
Any thoughts or tests of the German MEN M193?

https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?237292-MEN-56-Grain-M193-Accuracy

Straight Shooter
08-21-22, 17:45
THANK YOU MOLON!

1986s4
09-09-22, 07:05
Wow, thank you all ! Especially Molon.

Molon
10-10-22, 14:27
It would be cool to see the same thing with various mk262 clones form IMI and magtech and the likes.

IMI “Razor Core” 77 Grain OTM, LR, Mod 1



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_razor_core_box_02-1985629.jpg



This load is topped with a 77 grain OTM bullet with a cannelure. The case mouth is sealed and the primers are crimped and sealed. When chronographed from the 20” Colt barrel, the load had a muzzle velocity of 2866 FPS with a standard deviation of 21 FPS.

A 10-shot group group fired off the bench from my Lothar-Walther barreled AR-15 at a distance of 100 yards had an extreme spread of 0.95”.




https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_77_grain_razor_core_measured_10_shot-1985628.jpg



….

Straight Shooter
10-10-22, 15:20
Ive got several mags loaded to try and zero with my 20" as soon as I can get back to the range. After that...the 69gr in this.

https://i.postimg.cc/XvP5vD7B/Rifle-2.jpg (https://postimg.cc/SXWRTd9m)

Hammer_Man
10-11-22, 10:50
IMI “Razor Core” 77 Grain OTM, LR, Mod 1



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_razor_core_box_02-1985629.jpg



This load is topped with a 77 grain OTM bullet with a cannelure. The case mouth is sealed and the primers are crimped and sealed. When chronographed from the 20” Colt barrel, the load had a muzzle velocity of 2866 FPS with a standard deviation of 21 FPS.

A 10-shot group group fired off the bench from my Lothar-Walther barreled AR-15 at a distance of 100 yards had an extreme spread of 0.95”.




https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/imi_77_grain_razor_core_measured_10_shot-1985628.jpg



….

Any personal experience with Black Hills MK262? I’m curious if it performs any better in terms of muzzle velocity and group size, compared to this particular IMI loading.

Molon
10-11-22, 11:26
Any personal experience with Black Hills MK262?

Range Report: Black Hills MK262 Mod 1



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/black_hills_box_01_resized-1342439.jpg



The 77 grain MK262 ammunition produced by Black Hills Ammunition has been referred to as the most accurate mass-produced 5.56mm ammunition that has ever been type-classified and issued by the US military. Since its inception, genuine MK262 has been manufactured solely by Black Hills Ammunition. For years, MK262 was only available to the civilian population as “seconds,” but more recently Black Hills has made first-run production lots available on the commercial market. It is the first-run version of MK262 Mod 1 that I tested for this report.

MK262 Mod 1 is loaded in WCC 5.56mm brass and uses a cannelured version of the 77 grain Sierra MatchKing. The round is charged with a proprietary ball powder. The primer pockets are crimped and sealed. Contrary to erroneous information that has been posted on the Internet, MK262 Mod 1 does not have case-mouth sealant.




https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/mk262_casemouth_no_sealant_01_resized-1342448.jpg



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/mk262_casemouth_no_sealant_02_resized-1342449.jpg



The 77 grain MK262 Mod 1 projectile compared to the M193 projectile.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/mk262_canelure_vs_m193_03resized-1342447.jpg



MK262 powder. (The squares of the red grid measure 1/10 of an inch.)

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/mk262_mod_1_powder_01-1342451.jpg




Accuracy


The specification for the accuracy/precision portion of the lot-acceptance-testing of MK262 calls for multiple 10-shot groups to be fired; which is exactly what I like to do for a range report. An accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the first-run MK262 Mod 1 ammunition was performed following my usual protocol. This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any Group Reduction Techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Also, a control group was fired from the test-rifle used in the evaluation using match-grade, hand-loaded ammunition; in order to demonstrate the capability of the barrel. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The barrel used in the evaluation was free-floated. The free-float handguards of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was used. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/colt_with_pri_handguard_in_benchrest_001-1470442.jpg



The Wind Probe.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/wind_probe_2016_01_framedb-1342522.jpg



The test vehicle for this evaluation was one of my semi-automatic precision AR-15s with a 20” stainless-steel Lothar Walther barrel. The barrel has a 223 Wylde chamber with a 1:8” twist.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_walther_barrel_21_resized-1326537.jpg



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_barrel_crown_02_resized-1297385-1342445.jpg



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_walther_barrel_free_floated_05-12-1342446.jpg




Prior to firing the MK262 ammunition, I fired a 10-shot control group using match-grade hand-loads topped with the Sierra 77 grain MatchKing. That group had an extreme spread of 0.69”.




https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/lothar_walther_control_load_01_measured-1342444.jpg



Three 10-shot groups of the MK262 Mod 1 were fired in a row with the resulting extreme spreads (from smallest to largest):

0.96”
1.12”
1.21”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 1.10” (1.05 MOA). The three 10-shot groups were over-layed on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.33”.


The smallest 10-shot group.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/black_hills_mk262_mod_1_best_group_02-1342440.jpg




The 30-shot composite group.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/mk262_composite_group_02-1342450.jpg




Velocity


I chronographed the Black Hills 5.56mm MK262 Mod 1 ammunition from a semi-automatic AR-15 with a chrome-lined, NATO chambered 20” Colt M16A2 barrel.



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/Colt_20_inch_A2_barrel_02_border-1342441.jpg



Chronographing was conducted using an Oehler 35-P chronograph with “proof screen” technology. The Oehler 35P chronograph is actually two chronographs in one package that takes two separate chronograph readings for each shot and then has its onboard computer analyze the data to determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two readings. If there is, the chronograph “flags” the shot to let you know that the data is invalid. There was no invalid data flagged during this testing.

The velocity stated below is the muzzle velocity as calculated from the instrumental velocity using Oehler’s Ballistic Explorer software program. The string of fire consisted of 10 rounds over the chronograph.



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/oehler_chronograph_32-1342454.jpg



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/oehler_computer_02-1342452.jpg



Each round was single-loaded and cycled into the chamber from a magazine fitted with a single-load follower. The bolt locked-back after each shot allowing the chamber to cool in between each shot. This technique was used to mitigate the possible influence of “chamber-soak” on velocity data. Each new shot was fired in a consistent manner after hitting the bolt release. Atmospheric conditions were monitored and recorded using a Kestrel 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker.



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/kestrel_4000_21-1342442.jpg



Atmospheric conditions


Temperature: 79 degrees F
Humidity: 37%
Barometric pressure: 30.12 inches of Hg
Elevation: 950 feet above sea level



The muzzle velocity for the 10-shot string of the Black Hills 5.56mm MK262 Mod 1 ammunition fired from the 20” Colt barrel was 2848 FPS with a standard deviation of 10 FPS and a coefficient of variation of 0.35%!

For those of you who might not be familiar with the coefficient of variation (CV), it is the standard deviation, divided by the mean (average) muzzle velocity and then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. It allows for the comparison of the uniformity of velocity between loads in different velocity spectrums; e.g. 77 grain loads running around 2,650 fps compared to 55 grain loads running around 3,250 fps.

For comparison (and to give you an idea of how good the CV is for this factory loaded MK262 Mod 1 ammunition) the mil-spec for M193 allows for a coefficient of variation of approximately 1.2%, while one of my best 77 grain OTM hand-loads, with a muzzle velocity of 2639 PFS and a standard deviation of 4 FPS, has a coefficient of variation of 0.15%.



https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/28568/stnadard_deviation_of_4_fps_01-1342455.jpg



….