USMC03
01-09-09, 07:41
In the spring of 2008 I purchased a PWS FSC556 compensator for a project I was working on at that time. Over the past 15 years I have used numerous muzzle different flash hiders, muzzle brakes / compensators. A short list of the flash hiders / muzzle braakes that I have used are: A1 and A2 compensator, Sabre Defense long A2, Noveske Krink, Smith Vortex, Smith Ent. muzzle brake, Gem-Tech A2 and Vortex bi-loc, MSTN QC Comp, Surefire 556k flash hider, EGW A2 muzzle brake, Bushmaster Y-Comp and Mini-Y Comp, Bushmaster AK muzzle brake, JP Enterprises “Tank Brake”, JP Enterprises muzzle brake, Levang linear comp, CavArms Cav Comp, Wilson Combat muzzle brake that looks like the Cav Comp, Phantom flash hider, Ops Inc 2 port brake.
Those are just the muzzle devices that I can think of off the top of my head. What I learned over the course of several years using several different types of muzzle devices is that ……. (to quote Pat Rogers) “There is no free lunch”. If you wanted the best flash suppression it came at the cost of length (ie. Smith Vortex or Phantom) and would offer very little in the way of reducing muzzle rise or felt recoil.
If you wanted something that was effective at reducing muzzle rise and assisted with quicker follow up shots, you would have to deal a design that enhanced muzzle flash and muzzle blast (noise) that bordered on being obnoxious and is uncomfortable for some shooters. By design, most muzzle brakes direct the most of the gases and muzzle blast (noise) out the side of the muzzle brake (3 and 9 o’clock).
I had heard that the FSC556 did a good job at reducing flash, reducing muzzle flip, and wasn’t overly loud / obnoxious. I put the PWS FSC556 on a 16” Noveske N4 mid-length. I have never shot the FSC556 in no light, but I have shot it at dusk and found that the flash suppression was on par with the A2 compensator. The FSC556 did a good job a reducing muzzle flip and follow up shots quick and consistent. Noise was very tame as compared to other muzzle brakes / compensators that I had used in the past. The FSC556 is a little louder than the A2, but not by a wide margin. In my opinion it’s a great product and possess a great balance between flash suppression, reducing muzzle rise, and not being overly loud.
I have been using a 16” barrel with a mid-length gas system and a standard front sight tower as my competition (run and gun) gun for the last couple years and had been running a USGI A2 compensator on it. I really liked the FSC556, but it looked stupid on the mid-length barrel with the standard front sight tower. I wanted something that something that would reduce muzzle flip, but was approximately the same length as the USGI A2 compensator. After a little research I found that the PWS FSC556 was 2.10”, the DNTC was 2.00”, and the USGI A2 compensator was approximately 1.75”.
I was impressed enough with the FSC556 that I approached Todd at PWS about tweaking the FSC556 or the DNTC to be approximately the same size as the USGI A2 compensator. When I approached Todd with my idea, he told me that the product (in a very limited supply already existed). Todd explained that some of the guys had PWS had taken a FSC556, cut off the flash reducing tines, and laser engraved “Todd’s Tiny One” on the wrench flats, and had given it to him as a joke. Todd informed me that “Todd’s Tiny One” performs the same as the FSC556 at reducing muzzle flip, it just doesn’t have the flash reducing properties of the FSC556. I told Todd, that was fine with me as it was going on a competition gun, and flash reduction wasn’t a concern.
I recently received “Todd’s Tiny One” and got it mounted up yesterday. Hoping to hit the range with it on Tuesday.
PWS Todd’s Tiny One (bottom of the muzzle brake):
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/DPP_0004.jpg
PWS Todd’s Tiny One (side of the muzzle brake):
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0398_1.jpg
Todd’s Tiny One next to the FSC556:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0390_1.jpg
Top view - Todd’s Tiny One next to the FSC556:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/DPP_0003.jpg
L to R - Todd’s Tiny One, FSC556, FSC556 Quick Comp for the Gem-Tech G5:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/DPP_0002.jpg
Todd’s Tiny One next to a USGI A2 Compensator:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0391_1.jpg
L to R - Todd’s Tiny One, A2 Comp, FSC556, Surefire 556k Flash Hider, FSC556 Quick Comp for the Gem-Tech G5:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0392_1.jpg
And the new Bravo Company USA stainless mid-length barrel with the PWS Todd’s Tiny One:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/BCM%20Stainless%20Mid-Lenght/DPP_0009.jpg
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/BCM%20Stainless%20Mid-Lenght/DPP_0010.jpg
If I could build “Todd’s Tiny One” scratch ….. the only thing I would change would be, instead of having the wrench flats at 12 o’clock and 6 o’clock, I would make the bottom portion of the Todd’s Tiny One brake, identical to the USGI A2 flash hider (ie. the two rings and the wrench flats at 3 and 9 o’clock) and ensure that the overall length did not surpass the overall length of the USGI A2. This serves no functional purpose, but aesthetic stand point, it would be an awesome looking (and very functional) muzzle brake.
S/F,
Jeff
Those are just the muzzle devices that I can think of off the top of my head. What I learned over the course of several years using several different types of muzzle devices is that ……. (to quote Pat Rogers) “There is no free lunch”. If you wanted the best flash suppression it came at the cost of length (ie. Smith Vortex or Phantom) and would offer very little in the way of reducing muzzle rise or felt recoil.
If you wanted something that was effective at reducing muzzle rise and assisted with quicker follow up shots, you would have to deal a design that enhanced muzzle flash and muzzle blast (noise) that bordered on being obnoxious and is uncomfortable for some shooters. By design, most muzzle brakes direct the most of the gases and muzzle blast (noise) out the side of the muzzle brake (3 and 9 o’clock).
I had heard that the FSC556 did a good job at reducing flash, reducing muzzle flip, and wasn’t overly loud / obnoxious. I put the PWS FSC556 on a 16” Noveske N4 mid-length. I have never shot the FSC556 in no light, but I have shot it at dusk and found that the flash suppression was on par with the A2 compensator. The FSC556 did a good job a reducing muzzle flip and follow up shots quick and consistent. Noise was very tame as compared to other muzzle brakes / compensators that I had used in the past. The FSC556 is a little louder than the A2, but not by a wide margin. In my opinion it’s a great product and possess a great balance between flash suppression, reducing muzzle rise, and not being overly loud.
I have been using a 16” barrel with a mid-length gas system and a standard front sight tower as my competition (run and gun) gun for the last couple years and had been running a USGI A2 compensator on it. I really liked the FSC556, but it looked stupid on the mid-length barrel with the standard front sight tower. I wanted something that something that would reduce muzzle flip, but was approximately the same length as the USGI A2 compensator. After a little research I found that the PWS FSC556 was 2.10”, the DNTC was 2.00”, and the USGI A2 compensator was approximately 1.75”.
I was impressed enough with the FSC556 that I approached Todd at PWS about tweaking the FSC556 or the DNTC to be approximately the same size as the USGI A2 compensator. When I approached Todd with my idea, he told me that the product (in a very limited supply already existed). Todd explained that some of the guys had PWS had taken a FSC556, cut off the flash reducing tines, and laser engraved “Todd’s Tiny One” on the wrench flats, and had given it to him as a joke. Todd informed me that “Todd’s Tiny One” performs the same as the FSC556 at reducing muzzle flip, it just doesn’t have the flash reducing properties of the FSC556. I told Todd, that was fine with me as it was going on a competition gun, and flash reduction wasn’t a concern.
I recently received “Todd’s Tiny One” and got it mounted up yesterday. Hoping to hit the range with it on Tuesday.
PWS Todd’s Tiny One (bottom of the muzzle brake):
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/DPP_0004.jpg
PWS Todd’s Tiny One (side of the muzzle brake):
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0398_1.jpg
Todd’s Tiny One next to the FSC556:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0390_1.jpg
Top view - Todd’s Tiny One next to the FSC556:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/DPP_0003.jpg
L to R - Todd’s Tiny One, FSC556, FSC556 Quick Comp for the Gem-Tech G5:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/DPP_0002.jpg
Todd’s Tiny One next to a USGI A2 Compensator:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0391_1.jpg
L to R - Todd’s Tiny One, A2 Comp, FSC556, Surefire 556k Flash Hider, FSC556 Quick Comp for the Gem-Tech G5:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/Primary%20Weapons/IMG_0392_1.jpg
And the new Bravo Company USA stainless mid-length barrel with the PWS Todd’s Tiny One:
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/BCM%20Stainless%20Mid-Lenght/DPP_0009.jpg
http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk99/USMC03_photos/BCM%20Stainless%20Mid-Lenght/DPP_0010.jpg
If I could build “Todd’s Tiny One” scratch ….. the only thing I would change would be, instead of having the wrench flats at 12 o’clock and 6 o’clock, I would make the bottom portion of the Todd’s Tiny One brake, identical to the USGI A2 flash hider (ie. the two rings and the wrench flats at 3 and 9 o’clock) and ensure that the overall length did not surpass the overall length of the USGI A2. This serves no functional purpose, but aesthetic stand point, it would be an awesome looking (and very functional) muzzle brake.
S/F,
Jeff