Uh huh... so...

[Business_Casual]

Tactical enough?

http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson/upload/images/firearms/170292opt.jpg

[K.L. Davis]

Looks like a nice rig really... a lot of folks are fans of a revolver for the use by the guy behind a shield -- there is a tendency for you to "suck up" on the shield and an autoloader can have the back of the slide hit the shield and not pick up a new round... also, clearing a jammed handgun while holding a shield is, well, you can imagine.

So... I know a few people that are strong advocates of a wheel gun in that position -- or other postions where the shooter only has one hand. The failure drill for a wheel gun is after all, to pull the trigger again ;)

[Rob96]

Just wait till Jerry Mikuleck (sp?) gets his hands on that.

[DrMark]

No sling mounts?

[liberty911]

I like it too. It is Tacticool! It would be a "just because" kind of buy for me.

[Milkman]

No sling mounts?

http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson/upload/images/firearms/170231_large.jpg

[DrMark]

http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson/upload/images/firearms/170231_large.jpg


Well, I suppose I did ask about sling mounts...

[Milkman]

And just for the record, I like the revolver at the top but I would forgo the Aimpoint in exchange for a Doc. Opt. or a JPoint just to get the overall mass down in size.

ETA: One major benefit of a revolver is that you can pistol whip someone and it won't break.

[Edm]

It'll never make it. BUIS won't co-witness.:p

[SuicideHz]

K.L.- One hand? You need like three to operate that thing?

It is neat though. Seeing it without the accessories, I would have never imagined the accessories fit as nicely as they do.