PDA

View Full Version : Lockheed's HULC Combat Exoskeleton



Outlander Systems
03-14-09, 12:34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ_qR8zCLDc

The exoskeleton is based on a design from Berkeley Bionics of California, but Lockheed say they have brought significant pimpage to the basic HULC. The enhanced version is now on show at the Association of the United States' Army Winter Symposium in Florida.

"With our enhancements to the HULC system, Soldiers will be able to carry loads up to 200 pounds with minimal effort," according to Lockheed's Rich Russell.

From the vid, the HULC certainly seems a step forward on Raytheon's rival XOS mechwarrior suit, which at last report still trails an inconvenient power cable to the nearest wall socket.

Not so the HULC; four pounds of lithium polymer batteries will run the exoskeleton for an hour walking at 3mph, according to Lockheed. Speed marching at up to 7mph reduces this somewhat; a battery-draining "burst" at 10mph is the maximum speed.

The user can hump 200lb with relative ease while marching in a HULC, however, well in excess of even the heaviest combat loads normally carried by modern infantry. There'd be scope to carry a few spare batteries. Even if the machine runs out of juice, Lockheed claims that its reinforcement and shock absorption still helps with load carrying rather than hindering.

There are various optional extras, too. The HULC can be fitted with armour plating, heating or cooling systems, sensors and "other custom attachments". We particularly liked that last one: our personal request would be a powered gun or missile mount of some kind above the shoulder, linked to a helmet or monocle laser sight.

One does note that remote-controlled gun mounts weighing as little as 55lb are available, able to handle various kinds of normally tripod- or bipod-mounted heavy weapons.

You'd need more power, but that's on offer. According to the Lockheed spec sheet (pdf) there's an extended-endurance HULC fitted with a "silent" generator running on JP8 jet fuel. A tankful will run this suit for three days, marching eight hours per day - though presumably at the cost of some payload.

Doubtless other power options could be developed: Lockheed says the HULC needs 250 watts on average.

It's important to note that the HULC is basically a legs and body system only: there's no enhancement to the user's arms, though an over-shoulder frame can be fitted allowing a wearer to hoist heavy objects such as artilery shells with the aid of a lifting strop.

The HULC may not be quite ready for prime time yet. But the military exoskeleton as a concept does seem to be getting to the stage of usefulness, at least in niche situations for specific jobs.

The BigDog petrol packmule, an alternative strategy for helping footsoldiers carry their increasingly heavy loads, may now have a serious rival.

geminidglocker
03-14-09, 13:38
I want one!!!

Marcus L.
03-14-09, 14:23
Very cool, but I'm sure it costs a fortune. The only way to make it feasible is to use the engine option instead of batteries, and that will boost the price a lot. I'm betting that if such a suit gets fielded, it would only be for special operation troops that need to carry double the gear of a general enlisted.

However, I do wonder if the cost would exceed the usefulness.

ZDL
03-14-09, 15:43
The wall socket one looked genius from a support personnel standpoint. This one is def cool as well. I'll take 2. Imagine the case for the handicapped etc. Very cool. Thanks for the link.

Abraxas
03-14-09, 15:49
Very cool

hp35
03-15-09, 09:37
That would make my AT hike considerably easier.

FromMyColdDeadHand
03-15-09, 10:33
Actually a bigger market may be old people. Lot better to have them walking than riding in a cart.

Damn, I thought it was going to look like Iron-man. That is a travesty to name it after The Hulk.

pgpd3147
03-16-09, 01:38
Where was this when I was in Afghanistan!

bkb0000
03-16-09, 01:54
seems great for a few limited rolls... as far as any kind of combat roll? i'd have to see a whole shit load of other guys not get killed because of them before i'd consider suiting up.

call me an old fashioned change fearer

FlyAndFight
03-16-09, 09:03
"Run, Forrest, Run!"

:D

CarlosDJackal
03-16-09, 11:51
It's missing a couple of things:

- Built-in knee and elbow pads.
- Headlights, turn signals, and back-up lights
- Minigun mount
- Tactical thigh holster
- Built-in heating/refrigeration unit
- Plate carrier
And most of all: Cup holders!! :D

kaiservontexas
03-16-09, 11:58
Wouldn't excessive use weaken the individual using it since they are not putting all that effort through their own muscles?

SethB
03-16-09, 12:09
Wouldn't excessive use weaken the individual using it since they are not putting all that effort through their own muscles?

I don't think they are going to wear them for PT...

BAC
03-16-09, 12:30
Actually a bigger market may be old people. Lot better to have them walking than riding in a cart.

My first thought, too. Second thought was this could be handy for support guys.


-B

JSantoro
03-16-09, 15:22
Wouldn't excessive use weaken the individual using it since they are not putting all that effort through their own muscles?

Which is why the Army has as big a stake in this as it does.

Between this, Land Warrior, FCS, and others, they're perfectly happy to continue to buy gear in lieu of training men, and let the men depend on the gear to do their jobs while simultaneously being networked enough for the upper-level leaders to micromanage the men in the field.

wargasm
03-16-09, 15:51
Looks like something for the REMF's. Turn's the mere PAC Private into "Mighty Mouse"! Those guys can operate all day in that thing, really, because how much does a rucksack full of pencils weigh? Also, I don't think they need knee pads, I'm sure theirs are heavily calloused! :D