6933
04-27-09, 19:33
Thanks for all the info., informed opinions, and help. Here is what I have taken from the discussion so far. H&K-great gun as long as it is an H&K Tac .45(among others) and not the too large Mark 23, Glock-can't go wrong with a Glock, Sig-excellent gun, M&P-maybe too early to put into the H&K, Glock, Sig, 1911, category; doesn't mean not deserving, just too early, 1911-one from a reputable and proven manufacturer is a great gun. Are there no FN fans out there? FN supplies 70% of our military weapons(small arms, med. heavy, and heavy). Sorry any non-believers out there(possibly a liberal, maybe not) our armed forces, (and the citizen-soldiers who make them up) are the BEST! They wouldn't rely so heavily upon a company that produced crappy weapons. I digress. An interesting item I just read on another site had an opinion piece by Larry Vickers. From what I have read, Mr. Vickers is a decorated ex-Spec. Ops guy. Therefore, I would lean towards giving his opinion a lot of weight. He also is involved in the design and production of many aftermarket items for the M4 carbine and, these items are highly thought of. So, basically, Mr. Vickers said H&K makes an excellent, highly reliable, more accurate than many other handguns, handgun. Once again, I admit to being a nOObie, I am just trying to digest as much info as I can and make an informed decision on a handgun that is best suited to many different scenarios. I was in NOLA for Katrina and can see the need for a supremely reliable and accurate handgun. The unthinkable can actually happen. That being said I am not neglecting the training and practice issue. I plan on taking Blackwater classes to ge me up to speed and then to continue to take classes and regularly shoot. Any help, info, constructive criticism, apprecitated. Ya'll are great.