August
08-06-09, 12:07
I just finished a Stag carbine and spent some time prepping the trigger. The trigger is polished, JP springs installed, proper lubrication is applied.
The result is that the trigger has a really nice break, once all the slop in the system gets taken up. There is an initial "creep" then a secondary "creep" then a solid point in the take-up, which I presume is the positive angle of the sear surfaces. This is followed by a very satisfying, clean break.
My question is, how do I get all this backlash out of the system. I suspect what I'm feeling is the dimensional variation of the trigger and hammer pins inside the bearing surface of the trigger and hammer channels.
Is there a way to deal with "slop" in the the FCG components so as to eliminate creep??? Am I even on the right track here???
The result is that the trigger has a really nice break, once all the slop in the system gets taken up. There is an initial "creep" then a secondary "creep" then a solid point in the take-up, which I presume is the positive angle of the sear surfaces. This is followed by a very satisfying, clean break.
My question is, how do I get all this backlash out of the system. I suspect what I'm feeling is the dimensional variation of the trigger and hammer pins inside the bearing surface of the trigger and hammer channels.
Is there a way to deal with "slop" in the the FCG components so as to eliminate creep??? Am I even on the right track here???