PDA

View Full Version : 2007 HR 10/22 IH New Proposed Assault Rifle Ban



9DivDoc
02-22-07, 20:56
Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)
The Attorney General Will Decide Which Weapon Is Suitable For Hunting And
Which Is NOT


http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.1022:
HR 1022 IH

Yet Another "Assault" On Your 2nd Amendment Rights...

In 2004 the United States Congress rightly allowed the so-called "Assault Weapons Ban" to sunset after 10 years in law. It seems that the wisdom of the 2004 congress has been forgotten. On February 13, 2007, HR 1022 or the Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007 was introduced by Representative Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY). This bill (now in committee) proposes to permanently reinstate the 1994 ban and add even more draconian provisions; essentially banning all rifles not traditionally used for hunting or sport and high-capacity (or FULL capacity) magazines. Even more disturbing is the fact that, at his/her sole discretion, the United States Attorney General can determine the classification (therefore legality) of any firearm.

We at TGSCOM are obviously appalled at the lengths that some of our elected officials will go to erode, or in some cases destroy, our rights afforded to us by the 2nd Amendment. It's time that we are heard. We urge you to contact your elected representatives and let them know that this proposed ban is an affront to the law abiding citizens that choose to safely and legally own firearms.

Following are some excerpts from HR1022 that we find particularly troubling:

SEC. 7. STRENGTHENING THE BAN ON THE POSSESSION OR TRANSFER OF A LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE.
(a) Ban on Transfer of Semiautomatic Assault Weapon With Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device-
(1) IN GENERAL- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (y) the following:
(z) It shall be unlawful for any person to transfer any assault weapon with a large capacity ammunition feeding device.'.
...
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
(a) In General- Section 921(a)(30) of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2(a) of this Act, is amended to read as follows:
(30) The term `semiautomatic assault weapon' means any of the following
(A) The following rifles or copies or duplicates thereof:
...
`(ii) AR-10;
`(iii) AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, or Olympic Arms PCR;
...
`(v) Calico Liberty;
...
`(viii) Hi-Point Carbine;
...
`(x) Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
`(xi) M1 Carbine;
`(xii) Saiga;
...
`(xviii) Sturm, Ruger Mini-14;
...
`(D) A semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine, and that has--
`(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
`(ii) a threaded barrel;
`(iii) a pistol grip;
`(iv) a forward grip; or
`(v) a barrel shroud.
...
`(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.
...
SEC. 5. REPEAL OF CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS.
Section 922(v)(3) of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2(a) of this Act, is amended by striking `(3)' and all that follows through the 1st sentence and inserting the following:
`(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm that--
`(A) is manually operated by bolt, pump, level, or slide action;
`(B) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or
`(C) is an antique firearm.'.

Read the full text here: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.1022:

Nathan_Bell
02-22-07, 21:00
Yeah, I have seen this on several other forums. People's response about is driving me nuts. It is falling along the lines of; they have tried to do that since the old one sunset, this one won't happen either, Or folks are saying, "Well time to stock up on my gear."

Neither response is right, call and write your D#$%#$ Congress Creature and tell them that their vote against this would be a very good thing. If we lose them this time, they are gone folks.

9DivDoc
02-22-07, 21:55
I agree with you Nathan

If how the Congress is handling the unjust imprisonment of Border Patrol Agents
Ramos & Campeon or how they are willing to grant amnesty & allow 60 million illegal aliens to become US citizens (with more rights than tax paying citizens btw) -while ignoring the demands of those who pay their salaries.... is any indication of how they view any...opinions or demands of "we the people"..not too mention their complete lack of respect for the US Constitution, Bill of Rights...or The America of our Founding Fathers.....

Then the ownership of firearms is defiantely coming under greatest attack this year and the next...and they will go for the throat of the 2nd Amendment this time....

IMO

Dave L.
02-23-07, 03:25
What if someone were to create a "belt-fed" semi-auto, is that possible? Would it be covered by this ban? (just a random late night thought)