PDA

View Full Version : MAYOR BLOOMBERG’S WAR ON GUN RIGHTS



sullafelix
12-28-09, 22:57
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/12/28/bloombergs-blueprint/

Rider79
12-29-09, 09:29
Not that any of this is new news:


I have obtained a copy of Bloomberg’s secret “Blueprint for Federal Action on Guns” which is really a blueprint for how the Obama Administration can screw gun owners without needing anything from Congress. Chuck Michel is responsible for filing to FOIA request to get this one out and public where it belongs. This was the infamous 40 recommendations that the Washington Post reported on a few months ago. It this document doesn’t convince you that MAIG is a significantly more serious threat than any other gun control organization out there, nothing will. Whoever wrote this knows ATF very well, and understands federal gun laws well enough to know how to effectively make changes using only administrative and regulatory changes, which do not require action from the US Congress. While some of the 40 recommendations are not objectionable, quite a number of them are. Let me go down the list and pick out some of the worst offenders, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. Look at the document yourself to find others:

•Require REAL ID compliant identification for all gun purchasers. Those in non-complying states, which are many, will no longer be permitted to buy firearms.
•Recommends a ban on the importation of all “non-sporting” firearms and ammunition, and specifically calls for banning the FN Five-Seven. Kiss cheap imported rounds of military caliber goodbye. Maybe kiss Glock’s goodbye too. MAIG isn’t all that specific on what would be sporting or non sporting. Also note that MAIG can no longer claim they do not advocate banning guns. They do.
•Calls for keeping records for people who get a NICS default proceed, which means your background check has not “cleared” but you went through the required three day waiting period. These records can be kept for up to 20 years, in the case of someone who’s name matches someone on the “terror watch” list and six months ordinarily. Default proceeds can happen if NICS has incomplete records, or the system is down for a protracted period of time.
•Calls for more enforcement of gun shows using the Richmond model. The techniques used at the Richmond gun shows were bad enough that Congress held hearings about the methods, and demanding ATF put a stop to them. They actually recommend rescinding a number of the changes made to prevent these abuses.
•Recommends ways for the administration to exploit loopholes in Tiahrt to publish information on “problematic” gun dealers (so they can be sued by New York City, no doubt). As we’ve pointed out on this blog before, having a lot of traces doesn’t necessarily mean a dealer is breaking the law.
•Lots of recommendations for new record keeping requirements on the part of FFLs
•Requiring placement of alternate serial numbers of every newly manufactured gun, and requiring serial numbers to be deeper and larger. Also require that a consistent serial numbering scheme be adopted across all manufacturers and importers.
•Asks ATF to promote MAIG’s Responsible Dealer Partnership Program that they foisted on Wal-Mart, much like they do with NSSF’s “Don’t Lie for the Other Guy.” They imply NSSF’s program does not go far enough.
•Asks the CPSC to mandate gun safety lock standards. Gun dealers are required to provide these, but many gun owners are older, or younger, and do not have children. This would be a way to add substantially to the cost of a firearm, if a 30 dollar lock needed to be included with each sale.
•Extend the multiple purchase reporting requirement to long guns, especially ARs, 50 caliber firearms, and Kalashnikov variants. MAIG is not very clear on this, and I think it would be difficult for dealers to keep track of the current state of regulation.
•Specifically calls for the Stinger Pen Gun to be reclassified as an AOW. I had never heard of this before, but I guess it really pisses off someone in the New York Mayor’s office, which is a good enough reason, if any, to go buy one.
There can be no doubt now that MAIG is a gun control group, and a particularly dangerous one. This blueprint is comprehensive, and very well put together. Whoever helped MAIG with this knows what they are talking about, and I would imagine is a former higher up at ATF, since it evinces a detailed knowledge of how ATF works, and what their weaknesses are.

Please, if you have a MAIG Mayor in your town, or near your town, we need your help in getting them out. After the holidays, we’re all going to have some work to do in this regard, especially here in Pennsylvania. We’re pretty screwed if Obama even does some of these things. Let’s hope he has the good sense to know that the rest of the country isn’t New York City when it comes to this topic.

Alex V
12-29-09, 11:26
What confuses me about all of this is how will this prevent illegal guns from being on the street? this just makes it more dificult to have legal firearms.

In a world where gun's are outlawed, only the outlaws will have guns.

Im not in NYC, but close enough in NJ. If they come for my guns, they WILL have to pry it from my cold dead hands. I just hope other's feel as I do.

M4arc
12-29-09, 11:31
What confuses me about all of this is how will this prevent illegal guns from being on the street? this just makes it more dificult to have legal firearms.


This is not about keeping illegal guns off the streets. This is about keeping guns out of law abiding, tax paying, citizens to further our dependence on the government. They want are are succeeding in creating a nanny state.

dirksterg30
12-29-09, 11:32
What confuses me about all of this is how will this prevent illegal guns from being on the street? this just makes it more dificult to have legal firearms.

I'm sure that's the goal. People like Bloomberg don't think ordinary peons like you and me should have access to firearms.

Alex V
12-29-09, 13:15
This is not about keeping illegal guns off the streets. This is about keeping guns out of law abiding, tax paying, citizens to further our dependence on the government. They want are are succeeding in creating a nanny state.

Obviosly... But then don't name your group "Mayors Against Illegeal Firearms" Name your group "Mayors For Sucking On The Federal Tit" or something.

Clearly I Understand that they are calling their group as such to stay as far under the radar as posible, but it just pisses me off.

The problem is that they take away our rights little by little, that way no one notices. Like Pastor Martin Niemöller said in 1946, "Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me"

All I hear is "join the NRA and fight for our 2A rights!" but I see no actual fight. All the NRA does is send out news letters and these bills still get passed.

In NJ now we can only purchase one pistol/30 days... when the bill came up, the NRA sent me an e-mail saying I should call my local law maker. I did. And nothing.

We bitch and bitch and bitch, but it seems to me that nothing ever gets done in our favor.

VIVA LA REVOLUTION!


I'm sure that's the goal. People like Bloomberg don't think ordinary peons like you and me should have access to firearms.

Right, because when they take away all the rights, and make it the United Soviet States of America we will have nothing to fight against it with.

Believe me, I was born in the Soviet Union... we ain't that far off.