View Full Version : DIVORCE AGREEMENT
Saw this on another board today.
DIVORCE AGREEMENT
Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists,
Marxists and Obama supporters, et al:
We have stuck together since the late 1950's for the sake of the kids, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course.
Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right for us all, so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way.
Here is a model separation agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can
effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.
We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. We'll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and you can go with wind, solar and biodiesel. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell. You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them.
We'll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved lifelong welfare dwellers, food stamps, homeless, homeboys, hippies, druggies and illegal aliens. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks. We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood.
You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us. You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security.
We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political correctness and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill.
You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors. We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We'll keep "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" and "The National Anthem." I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute "Imagine", "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing", "Kum Ba Ya" or "We Are the World".
We'll practice trickle down economics and you can continue to give trickle up poverty your best shot.
Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name
and our flag.
Would you agree to this? In the spirit of friendly parting, I wonder if you can predict which one of us will need whose help in 15 years.
Sincerely,
John J. Wall
Law Student and an American
P. S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Barbra Streisand, & Jane Fonda with you.
P. S. S. And you won't have to press 1 for English when you call our
country.
__________________
Too bad this isn't real. That would be a dream come true.
It could be true, just no one has the balls to actually do anything about it today. The Shit the Fed is getting away with is WORSE than anything the Brits did to the Colonists to make them revolt 234yrs ago. If this shit was going on 200 years ago, every man with a gun would have rebelled....
Its time we grew a set and gave an ultimatium to the Fed's.
parishioner
07-08-10, 10:28
I don't know if its because I'm getting older and more educated or if it has always been like this and just never was aware of it, but to me, it does seem like the ideas of what America should be is becoming more and more polarized.
It could be true, just no one has the balls to actually do anything about it today. The Shit the Fed is getting away with is WORSE than anything the Brits did to the Colonists to make them revolt 234yrs ago. If this shit was going on 200 years ago, every man with a gun would have rebelled....
Its time we grew a set and gave an ultimatium to the Fed's.
I agree 100% - the problem is knowing that you have supporters who feel the same way as you and are willing to pay the price. There's no point in fighting when the people you're fighting for don't believe in your cause. Note I didn't say it wasn't worth fighting for - just that it's pointless as you can't win when 99% of everyone on your side sits back watching. I think that there is what the Tea Party movement is causing; people are becoming aware that they're not alone, that we're not going to let our government do this. I'm neither saying you have to agree with or support the Tea Parties, but it a grassroots movement that happened spontaneously. That shows that people all over are getting fed up and, as they continue, people will hopefully embolden.
I truly believe that if something isn't done, there WILL be a violent uprising, and I'm not talking about just rioting and picketing.
Gutshot John
07-08-10, 11:07
Never mind. :rolleyes:
I 100% agree with you. The problem is getting the majority off their asses to do something. To many people dont want to or cant think for themselves anymore and just want to be told what to do and how to live. They dont care as long as "They" arent directly affected by it. But the thing is, EVERYONE is directly effected by EVERYTHING the Fed is doing.
I hope it never has to come to, hate to say it, but another Civil War. I hate to use that, but thats what it will be. I'd like to think if it does, the States and National Guard would be on the "peoples" sides along with alot of Active Mil(USMC, Army, Air, Navy), but I fear to many of them will go with the "The Fed signs my paycheck, so Ill just do what they say"
I really truely hope it doesnt have to come to that. But the Fed's really need a ultimatium, and soon.
Abraham Lincoln once said, "No Army of Europe or Asia will ever make tracks on the Blue Ridge or Drink from the Mississippi. If America is to be undone, it is to be undone from the inside" (I got that partly right, but you get the point).
Gutshot John
07-08-10, 11:13
I 100% agree with you. The problem is getting the majority off their asses to do something. To many people dont want to or cant think for themselves anymore and just want to be told what to do and how to live. They dont care as long as "They" arent directly affected by it. But the thing is, EVERYONE is directly effected by EVERYTHING the Fed is doing.
I hope it never has to come to, hate to say it, but another Civil War. I hate to use that, but thats what it will be. I'd like to think if it does, the States and National Guard would be on the "peoples" sides along with alot of Active Mil(USMC, Army, Air, Navy), but I fear to many of them will go with the "The Fed signs my paycheck, so Ill just do what they say"
I really truely hope it doesnt have to come to that. But the Fed's really need a ultimatium, and soon.
Abraham Lincoln once said, "No Army of Europe or Asia will ever make tracks on the Blue Ridge or Drink from the Mississippi. If America is to be undone, it is to be undone from the inside" (I got that partly right, but you get the point).
Fair enough.
rickrock305
07-08-10, 12:14
not sure it would be such a great deal...
Red States vs. Blue States
With the Blue States in hand, the Democrats have firm control of 80% of the country's fresh water, over 90% of our pineapple and lettuce, 92% of all fresh fruit production, 93% of the artichoke production, 95% of America's export quality wines, 90% of all cheese production, 90% of the high tech industry, most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools, plus Amherst, Stanford, Berkeley, CalTech and MIT.
We can live simply but well.
The Red States, on the other hand, now have to cope with 88% of all obese Americans (and their projected health care cost spike), 92% of all US mosquitoes, 100% of all tornadoes, 90% of all hurricanes, 99% of all Southern Baptists, 100% of all Televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.
Additionally, 38% of those in the Red states believe Jonah was actually eaten by a whale, 62% believe life is sacred unless we're discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44% believe that evolution is just a theory, 53% that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11 and, most difficult of all to grasp, 61% believe that Bush is a person of moral conviction!
http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/politics/red-blue-states-summary.htm
And by the obviously bias bullshit u just posted, it leans so far to the problem side that it's about to fall over. Indiana went "Blue" because of the minority vote from the Shitcago and Indy suburbs. Those people fit in perfectly with the crowd I spoke of. They no longer can or want to think for themselves. They expect someone else to "take care of them". The ONLY reason the majority of minority voters voted is because of the President himself being a minority! There are countless tv interviews from the election time with people stating the reason they voted was BHO is a minority and or "He is going to take care if me now, I don't have to worry about anything anymore". They are SHEEP, and wish to be, blindly following their leaders.
The rights set forth in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were put there for this exact reason people! We must take back control of our country, ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
not sure it would be such a great deal...
Red States vs. Blue States
snip
62% believe life is sacred unless we're discussing the death penalty or gun laws,
snip
http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/politics/red-blue-states-summary.htm
Blue States:
some huge percentage only care about the lives of whales and murders, but don't give a flip about the lives of babies.
You can turn it around and make blue states sound really bad if you want. The originator of the above list of things is obviously a blue stater and has no clue on reality. Why post it here?
not sure it would be such a great deal...
Red States vs. Blue States
With the Blue States in hand, the Democrats have firm control of 80% of the country's fresh water, over 90% of our pineapple and lettuce, 92% of all fresh fruit production, 93% of the artichoke production, 95% of America's export quality wines, 90% of all cheese production, 90% of the high tech industry, most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools, plus Amherst, Stanford, Berkeley, CalTech and MIT.
We can live simply but well.
The Red States, on the other hand, now have to cope with 88% of all obese Americans (and their projected health care cost spike), 92% of all US mosquitoes, 100% of all tornadoes, 90% of all hurricanes, 99% of all Southern Baptists, 100% of all Televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.
Additionally, 38% of those in the Red states believe Jonah was actually eaten by a whale, 62% believe life is sacred unless we're discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44% believe that evolution is just a theory, 53% that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11 and, most difficult of all to grasp, 61% believe that Bush is a person of moral conviction!
http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/politics/red-blue-states-summary.htm
All of that still sounds better than Marxism.
All of that still sounds better than Marxism.
That quote right there is the end all to any argument. Sure our country has it's faults. Everyone is different, but no one wants oppressive Government.
That quote right there is the end all to any argument. Sure our country has it's faults. Everyone is different, but no one wants oppressive Government.
I'd rather deal with dumb, ignorant, overweight people than have a dumb, ignorant, bloated, socialist government.
At what point, RickRock, did you think it was a good idea to let the goverment run all aspects of your life?
At what point, RickRock, did you think it was a good idea to let the goverment run all aspects of your life?
Most likely in utero. :rolleyes:
I would have a problem deciding which side to fight for based on that divorce agreement...
On one hand I hate high taxes, but on the other I hate religion.
On one hand I love my gun rights, but on the other I "love" ;) abortion.
Can there be a third country where we are free to have all the firearms we can afford while retaining a woman's right to choose and renouncing organized religion all while under a small nonintrusive government? Im up for that one!
I would have a problem deciding which side to fight for based on that divorce agreement...
On one hand I hate high taxes, but on the other I hate religion.
On one hand I love my gun rights, but on the other I "love" ;) abortion.
Can there be a third country where we are free to have all the firearms we can afford while retaining a woman's right to choose and renouncing organized religion all while under a small nonintrusive government? Im up for that one!
So you're all for a women's right to choose BUT you don't think people should be able to worship freely? :rolleyes:
while retaining a woman's right to choose
No red state removes a woman's right to choose. They just force her to live with the consequences of that action, preferring to side with caution instead of murder.
Pro Choice is not the question. Women can choose. They just have to follow the consequences of their actions, like all the rest of us.
No red state removes a woman's right to choose. They just force her to live with the consequences of that action, preferring to side with caution instead of murder.
Pro Choice is not the question. Women can choose. They just have to follow the consequences of their actions, like all the rest of us.
I think you're wasting your time. He clearly states that he "loves" abortion yet "hates" religion and doesn't see where people should have the right to practice the religion of their choice.
Make sense? Not to me either but apparently it does to him.
No red state removes a woman's right to choose. They just force her to live with the consequences of that action, preferring to side with caution instead of murder.
Pro Choice is not the question. Women can choose. They just have to follow the consequences of their actions, like all the rest of us.
Most red states also allow for abortion should the woman's health be in jeopardy, or in cases on incest and rape. Those should be the only cases where abortion is allowed.
Ironically, the individuals delusional enough to think that women's rights are removed because they can't abort the baby they CHOSE to have (what did you think would happen when you commit the act of reproduction?) also ignore that the person could have a) used contraception, b) understood that the function having sex is for reproductive purposes, or c) simply NOT HAD SEX. People can drive a car at 70mph without running off a road, they can shoot a gun safely without endangering others, heck, they can land spaceships on the moon, but somehow they can't keep from undressing someone of the opposite sex and screwing them? Yeah, RIIIIIGHT. It's stupid people doing stupid things that they didn't think out.
The argument of "giving women the right to choose" is ******* hypocritical. The woman CHOSE to have sex; the baby didn't and can't choose to be born. Anyone willing to kill an innocent life because they made an irresponsible decision should have their brain sucked out, their body dismembered, and then dumped in a garbage can... because that's exactly what they would be doing to the unborn child.
As far as I'm concerned religious and irreligious people in this country live under nearly the same level of tyranny that existed before we broke away from the evil british empire.
For the last 50 years the central government has been on an absolute jihad against the family, marriage, public displays of religion and speech they deem "offensive". If we don't reverse the tide, in 50 more years we'll be just like Russia where the primary activities are drinking, smoking, pathological-lying and cheating.
The best thing a state could do would be to start putting people to death over all sorts of crimes. And I'm talking right after the trial. Murder, Rape, Adultery, Stealing, etc. All the golden oldies. Don't like it? Move to some place that tolerates worthless human cockroach degenerates.
I knew there was a reason I loved the people on this forum..... its the only place I could find that doesn't want to make me pull my hair out in frustration. Thanks for being my "right-minded" friends.... no pun intended.... ok, well, maybe a little. haha
I would have a problem deciding which side to fight for based on that divorce agreement...
On one hand I hate high taxes, but on the other I hate religion.
On one hand I love my gun rights, but on the other I "love" ;) abortion.
Can there be a third country where we are free to have all the firearms we can afford while retaining a woman's right to choose and renouncing organized religion all while under a small nonintrusive government? Im up for that one!
Why should a woman have the unilateral "right" to kill another human being?
dookie1481
07-08-10, 15:38
This thread is full of ARFCOM-level ****tardedness.
...but on the other I "love" ;) abortion.
What could possibly possess you to write such a thing here?
Stop the ride, I want off...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.