PDA

View Full Version : A Beginners/Buyers Guide to the HK USP Series of Handguns



lloydkristmas
10-12-10, 16:22
***I know many of you are experienced handgunners who likely have your own personal opinions about the HK USP pistol. I wrote this review over at HKPro.com, but in case there are any members here who are considering a USP, here goes.....

A Beginners /Buyers Guide to the H&K USP Series of Handguns


I have been a gun owner for many years, but in 2003 I was witness to an armed robbery that made me realize I was in desperate need of a defensive handgun. A reliable defensive handgun. One that I could learn inside and out, and trust my life to every day. I found the HK USP to be that weapon. It wasn’t my first pistol, nor was it my first HK weapon, but it was the gun that I learned to appreciate the most out of all the others I owned. Since then, I have owned, carried, used, and abused 7 different variations of the USP Pistol, and shot many others. I have NEVER experienced a malfunction with ANY of the HK pistols I have owned. Not a single one. If that is the kind of performance you are looking for in a defensive pistol, look no further than the HK USP.

There is a wealth of information related to the USP Series of pistols available on the web. Consider this a Guide/Review/Buyers aid to all things USP. I will try to address issues and questions that new USP owners or potential USP owners may have.

How much does a USP typically cost?

HK makes a top-quality handgun, and they typically are priced to reflect this. USP pistols, however, are typically very easy to find at prices way lower than MSRP. Prices vary based on caliber, frame size, features, etc, but as a general rule, a used USP can be found anywhere from $500-$700. The .45 caliber variants are typically more expensive, but not by much.

So how do you decide if you’re looking at a good deal or not?

Obviously, the condition of the gun must be taken into account. HK makes a very durable sidearm, and they are relatively low-wear pistols. Check the barrel hood for signs of wear, this is a good indicator of past usage in USPs. A barrel hood that is worn to a silver shine is indicative of heavier use than one that barely has wear on it. Also look at how many magazines the pistol includes. HK USP magazines are usually priced fairly high (anywhere from 30 to 50 dollars depending on the caliber and model), so a gun with 7 magazines might command a higher price than a gun with 2 magazines.

Speaking of magazines….

USP pistols have been around since before the Federal Assault Weapons Ban. This ban restricted the use of “high capacity” (read, anything above ten rounds) to government and police agencies only. This ban was lifted several years back, but evidence of it still lingers. Many USP pistols will include ten-round magazines instead of the higher capacity magazines. These are leftovers from the ten-year span that the ban covered. These magazines are typically worth half as much as normal, higher capacity magazines, so take this into account when deciding whether or not the pistol you are eyeing is really a good deal. ***This does not apply to the USP Compact .45 pistol, as its capacity is only 8 rounds, so no neutered magazines were ever needed.


What is the date code and what does it mean?

Another factor to consider is the “date code” of the pistol. This is a two-letter code that tells you what year the pistol was made in. The USP was introduced in the early 90’s, and is still in production today, so at this point in time, a USP date code could start with either an “A” , a "B", or a “K”. The letters correspond to numbers, as follows.

A=0
B=1
C=2
D=3
E=4
F=5
G=6
H=7
I=8
K=9

So a pistol with the date code “KF” was made in 1995, whereas a pistol with the date code “AK” was made in 2009. ***On newer HK USP pistols, there is a “DE” marking on the slide. This is not a date code, it’s an unrelated marking from the factory, ignore it.

Is there a certain date code I should look for or avoid?

There have been minor changes to the USP series over the course of its production run, but none of them represent significant design flaws, and the date code of a USP pistol is merely indicative of its age. Of course, there are pistols built in 2009 that have been heavily used, and there are pistols built in 1995 that have never even been shot, so the date code does not always correlate to the condition of the gun. I always strive to get the most current date code possible, but I base my purchases on condition, rather than strictly by code.

1994 changed from a conventional land and groove rifling to the Polygonal bore, as well as the beginning of the use of a captive recoil assembly. Sometime in 1995 some changes were made to enhance the trigger as well. Personally, I would look for the most recent date code possible, while still remaining within the boundaries of my budget. The biggest generational changes in the USP came in 1994 (all pistols from then on had polygonal rifling in the barrel), 1995 (the trigger was slightly improved), and then somewhere between 1996-1999 (firing pin improvements). All USP pistols should serve you well, but those are the main generational differences for those who might care to know.


What are the different variations of the USP?

The USP pistol was the first of the lineup to be introduced. The USP Compact pistol came on the scene a couple years later, followed by “Tactical”, “Expert”, “Elite”, “Compact Tactical”, “Custom Combat”, and “Match” variations. Odds are, the average person in search of a defensive pistol for carry or household use will find what they need in either the USP or USP Compact models. Here’s a quick breakdown of each type though:

USP: Standard duty-sized pistol.

USP Compact: Reduced in barrel length by about 1 inch, frame thickness, and height, as well as magazine capacity.

USP Tactical: Includes a threaded barrel for use with a suppressor, raised sights to be visible above said suppressor, a match grade trigger with overtravel stop, and an “O-ring” on the barrel for improved barrel stability and accuracy. Oh yeah, and a cool carrying case. Typically commands $250ish dollars more than the standard USP.

USP Expert: Includes the same Match grade trigger and raised sights as the Tactical model, but has a lengthened slide and barrel (about 1 inch longer) and no barrel threads. An excellent competition gun. Typically priced close to $1000.

USP Elite: Includes the same Match grade trigger, tall sights, but has an even longer barrel at approx. 6 inches. Typically used as a target/competition gun. Typically priced above $1000.

Compact Tactical: Basically a USP Compact in .45 with a longer, threaded barrel. Typically $250ish more than the standard USP Compact.

Custom Combat: Standard USP with fiber optic sight, textured grip panels, and a different frame color (gray, tan, or green). Typically $100-200 more than the standard USP, depending on the color.

Match: Basically the same as the USP Tactical, except with a longer 6 inch barrel (unthreaded), and a barrel weight bolted to the underside of the frame. Made famous by the Tomb Raider series of films. Typically best suited as a bullseye gun or bowling pin shooter, the Match is unwieldy and slow to draw and transition from target to target. Typically priced from $1500-$2500. Discontinued.

What are the different configurations of the USP?

The USP can be had in all sorts of different configurations based on user preference. Right hand, left hand, ambidextrous, no safety, no decocker, LEM (Law Enforcement Modification – basically a very light double action) DA only, etc. The HK factory or an armorer can set the gun up the way you like it.

Most USP pistols I see are in the “V1” configuration, what is this?

This is the designation of the standard setup for the USP. V1 denotes that it is a double action / single action, with decocker and manual thumb safety. Assuming you are right handed, this is typically the most versatile USP configuration.

Here is a table that outlines the different available USP configurations
http://hkpro.com/uspvariants.jpg



Everyone says the USP is too big….is this true?

The USP series (in its normal, full sized configuration) is a large pistol, yes. Many people still carry full sized USP pistols as concealed carry weapons, holster selection becomes especially important though. The .45 version of the USP is slightly longer and thicker, so users with small hands may have trouble gripping and manipulating the pistol. The USP Compact, however, is smaller in almost every dimension, and many people find it to be a better fit for their hand than the full sized gun. Almost any reputable gun shop or good sized gun show should have examples of both to handle. Hand fit is up to the user and you must ultimately decide for yourself. ***If the USP series absolutely does not fit you, look into the P30 and HK45 series of guns. I prefer the USP for reasons not worth discussing right now, but the P30 and HK45 offer some ergonomic advantages you might appreciate.

Can the USP Full Size share magazines with the USP Compact, and vice versa?

No. One of the biggest complaints about the USP was its bulk. When HK made the Compact variant, they had to slim down the frame to make the gun more manageable. Unfortunately this made the Compact too slim to use the magazines from its bigger brother. ***USP Compact magazines are made of metal, USP Full Size magazines are made of polymer, except for the .45 caliber, it uses metal magazines.

I have heard horror stories about HK customer service being terrible, is this true?

No. It is largely internet rumor. I have contacted HK CS on several occasions and have always gotten prompt, respectful, and knowledgeable service. HK improved its service department several years ago, and you have nothing to worry about. Pardon me for getting too optimistic, but the odds that you will ever even need HK CS are slim to none.

How reliable is the USP series?

USP pistols (and HK firearms in general) are known for their reliability. The USP is one of the most reliable pistols on the planet. It was originally designed around the .40SW cartridge, so 9mm USP pistols are naturally “overbuilt”. They are a little large, but are built like tanks. The .45 USP is scaled up in every way, and is very durable, even with +P and +P+ ammo, though HK doesn’t recommend you use it often. I have personally owned 7 HK pistols in varying conditions, ages, and levels of prior usage, and NONE of them have ever had a malfunction. Not a single one. Each gun saw at least 1000 rounds during my time of ownership. I have every bit of faith in my USP’s as reliable defensive weapons.

So you got your USP, now what?

Help, my USP shoots to the left, is it inaccurate?

No. No offense, but its you, not the gun. These pistols are mechanically more accurate than you or I can probably shoot them. The USP series is not known for its stellar triggers. The DA trigger is long and heavy, and the SA trigger is much better, but still nothing award winning. Almost every new HK shooter I have known (including myself) was shooting low and left when they first got their gun. Learn to master the trigger, and this should quickly go away. If you cant afford to shoot through all your ammo to practice, buy a snap cap and use it for dry fire practice. Before you know it you’ll be shooting the center out of the target.

My USP shoots low, what the hell?

When shooting the USP, position the front sight ON TOP OF your target, rather than just below it. In other words, cover up the bullseye with the front sight, and fire. This is how the USP is designed to be shot. If you use the “pumpkin on a post” method of aiming (bullseye ‘resting’ on top of the front sight) you will shoot low.

I want a light for my USP, where can I find one?

The USP has a proprietary rail that can only accommodate the HK M2 UTL light. (Typically $100-150) While the UTL is a decent light, there are better designs available. In order to use non-HK specific lights, you need to get a picatinny rail adapter. There are a couple different variations that come with varying price tags. The GG&G adapter is the best, but it is also the most expensive. All of them will work, however, just make sure you aren’t buying an airsoft part.


Holsters. Where do I start?

Depends. If youre going to carry it, get yourself a good in-waistband holster, like one from Milt Sparks or Bianchi. If you want a hip holster, look into the Serpa series from Blackhawk , or a Safariland holster. If you want a thigh holster, Safariland makes the best ones. Holsters could be discussed for hours on end, check the holster section of this site for more info than what I could ever hope to provide.


I’m sure I am missing something, but that is a basic rundown of information that you as a potential USP owner or new USP owner should need. I will update this as I think of more pertinent information, and I’m sure than other members will chime in as well. Overall, the USP series is one of the finest handguns available on today’s market, and there is probably at least one variant that fits your need. Get your hands on a USP, I’m almost positive you’ll come to appreciate them as I have.


Some HK’s for your viewing pleasure:

http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/ac40/FNHKSIG/DSC01196.jpg

http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/ac40/FNHKSIG/USPC2.jpg

http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/ac40/FNHKSIG/GLOCKUSPwatches.jpg




Here's another review of a gun that doesnt get much attention on the web, the FNH FS2000

https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=59699

GermanSynergy
10-13-10, 05:52
Great post & very informative.

I've always like the USP 9, and feel it is a worthy successor to the venerable P-1 in the German Armed Forces.

Prior to my cousin being conscripted into the German Army for his national service, I trained him up on the USP 9 and after 1000 rounds or so he became a very good shot (considering he had never touched a real firearm up to that point in his life).

I know that the German P-8 variant has a Walther P-38 / P-1 style safety, but he scores high on his marksmanship qualifications.

ECAM
10-13-10, 08:31
I read often, have posted little, and tend to keep my mouth shut and learn here....

I have a USPc .40 LEM that has been my issued weapon since 2004. It has an AC series serial# and has well in excess of 30K through it. It is armorer-maintained. It has suffered 3 breakdowns during this period. Two were related to the firing pin. I know there is much discussion on where/when the pin design was changed. I do know mine was the original design and broke at approximately the 12K point. The breakage caused the weapon to sieze approximately 1/4" out of battery and required a trip to the armorer to disassemble and repair. The same old-style pin was replaced and broke again in the same fashion approximately 3K later. Another trip to the doctor was required. This time, a newly-designed pin was installed and it has run trouble free since. And to answer the question...yes, I have used snap caps religiously since it was issued to me. The only other problem was the breakage of the flat spring at around 30K. (I no longer count rounds through it.)

Although I have a love/hate relationship with the LEM trigger, I am comfortable and have complete confidence in this gun. I take care of it, but certainly don't baby it. It's a tool and that's how it's treated. It certainly isn't a bullseye gun, and is at it's best when run fast. I don't find the reset distance an issue (well used to it by now).

I also have an identical POW that has about half the round count through it. The armorer was kind enough to replace the pin on that as well, and it has been 100% trouble free since new.

I dislike the proprietary rail system on it, and compared to a SIG or Glock, it has a bit more "snap" to it during recoil. No doubt a combo of the poly frame and higher bore axis. Nothing that isn't trainable obviously. I have come to love the mag release and actually prefer it to the conventional thumb-side button.

Holsters are easily obtained, and when on my own dime, usually carry in either a C-TAC or a Indicernable that Mark Garrity made for me a few years back.

Just one man's opinion.

lloydkristmas
10-13-10, 14:06
I read often, have posted little, and tend to keep my mouth shut and learn here....

I have a USPc .40 LEM that has been my issued weapon since 2004. It has an AC series serial# and has well in excess of 30K through it. It is armorer-maintained. It has suffered 3 breakdowns during this period. Two were related to the firing pin. I know there is much discussion on where/when the pin design was changed. I do know mine was the original design and broke at approximately the 12K point. The breakage caused the weapon to sieze approximately 1/4" out of battery and required a trip to the armorer to disassemble and repair. The same old-style pin was replaced and broke again in the same fashion approximately 3K later. Another trip to the doctor was required. This time, a newly-designed pin was installed and it has run trouble free since. And to answer the question...yes, I have used snap caps religiously since it was issued to me. The only other problem was the breakage of the flat spring at around 30K. (I no longer count rounds through it.)

Although I have a love/hate relationship with the LEM trigger, I am comfortable and have complete confidence in this gun. I take care of it, but certainly don't baby it. It's a tool and that's how it's treated. It certainly isn't a bullseye gun, and is at it's best when run fast. I don't find the reset distance an issue (well used to it by now).

I also have an identical POW that has about half the round count through it. The armorer was kind enough to replace the pin on that as well, and it has been 100% trouble free since new.

I dislike the proprietary rail system on it, and compared to a SIG or Glock, it has a bit more "snap" to it during recoil. No doubt a combo of the poly frame and higher bore axis. Nothing that isn't trainable obviously. I have come to love the mag release and actually prefer it to the conventional thumb-side button.

Holsters are easily obtained, and when on my own dime, usually carry in either a C-TAC or a Indicernable that Mark Garrity made for me a few years back.

Just one man's opinion.




Thanks for your input. Other than the run of bad firing pins, the USP series hasnt had any glaring flaws. I dislike the .40SW cartridge, especially in Compact USPs, just like you said, it tends to jump a little too much. The .45 compact shoots softer than the .40, in my opinion

Darwinsdead
10-13-10, 16:38
Thanks for your input. Other than the run of bad firing pins, the USP series hasnt had any glaring flaws. I dislike the .40SW cartridge, especially in Compact USPs, just like you said, it tends to jump a little too much. The .45 compact shoots softer than the .40, in my opinion

Thanks for the informative post. I own a USPc .40 as well and although I don't like the jump I'm relieved to know that it's not just me.

Magic_Salad0892
10-14-10, 13:19
It doesn't make a huge difference for me, but I like the USP style magazine catch more than the standard JMB style.

lloydkristmas
10-14-10, 13:28
It doesn't make a huge difference for me, but I like the USP style magazine catch more than the standard JMB style.

Same here, but I can also see why some people wouldnt like it.....A lot of guys who I let try the USP (who have never shot HKs before) have a hell of a time with the mag release. I guess its one of those things you have to get used to, but once you do, you learn to like it.

Im used to the USP mag release, and I dont care for the pushbutton style a la Glock, Sig, etc

ECAM
10-14-10, 13:39
Maybe it's my smaller "girlie hands" but my mag changes are waaay faster and smoother. The amount of adjustment of the pistol in hand for the followup is minmial as well. More likely a training issue at this point, but it sure doesn't seem like it.

Rushing
04-20-15, 20:49
Bringing this thread back from the dead. I tried the HK USP in 45 ACP (first time shooting 45) and I like the USP and all, but I wish the mag release paddle was a bit bigger.
My question is whether or not it can be upgraded in any way to a wider paddle like some of the newer HK pistols?

Would be an interesting mod if possible and I really enjoy the mag release on HK pistols compared to a lot of other pistols.
Anyway, thank you for the mass amount of information on the pistol and creating this thread, lloydkristmas.

Serpico1985
04-20-15, 20:57
Yes: http://www.hkparts.net/shop/pc/Extended-Magazine-Release-For-HK-Pistols-200p1669.htm

Also, try using your primary hand trigger finger to manipulate the mag catch, with a little practice it's very fast and intuitive.

Rushing
04-20-15, 21:14
Thanks, Serpico1985!

Actually have been using my middle finger in the VP9 for the release.

The Dumb Gun Collector
04-20-15, 21:24
Amazing post!

Dionysusigma
04-23-15, 02:11
You... you do realize this post (though informative and accurate) is almost five years old, right... ?

lifebreath
04-23-15, 09:59
Old thread, great guns! The USP .45 sits on my nightstand. Big gun, but it's really nice shooting, and with 12+1 capacity of 230gr Federal HST, I feel adequately armed. I bought one this year, since I fear the USP line could go away, although that's just speculation.

The newer P2000 9mm is a fantastic gun with a standard Glock-style rail. It alternates, depending on circumstances, with my G19 as my EDC. Here's the USP 45 next to a G17 for comparison. Not that much bigger than 17, but feels heftier and the grip is a little larger. (Click to enlarge)

32904

jck397
04-23-15, 11:14
Old thread, great guns! The USP .45 sits on my nightstand. Big gun, but it's really nice shooting, and with 12+1 capacity of 230gr Federal HST, I feel adequately armed. I bought one this year, since I fear the USP line could go away, although that's just speculation.

My gut feeling, based on the introduction of the USP 9 Tactical so recently, is that the USP line will not be going anywhere anytime soon. If anything, I would expect the USP Compact/P2000 to be in danger since they are the most similar, especially with the P30sk arriving as a direct competitor to the P2000sk. The P2000 line has always been somewhat of a red-headed stepchild for H&K...

RAM Engineer
04-23-15, 11:21
Wish those UTL's were still available along with the LED conversions.

lifebreath
04-23-15, 12:26
They need to scrap the 2000 and just update the usp with a standard glock style rail. I chose the p2000 rather then the p30 because I like a rail but not a picatinny rail on a carry gun.

Auto426
04-23-15, 12:39
Bringing this thread back from the dead. I tried the HK USP in 45 ACP (first time shooting 45) and I like the USP and all, but I wish the mag release paddle was a bit bigger.
My question is whether or not it can be upgraded in any way to a wider paddle like some of the newer HK pistols?

Would be an interesting mod if possible and I really enjoy the mag release on HK pistols compared to a lot of other pistols.
Anyway, thank you for the mass amount of information on the pistol and creating this thread, lloydkristmas.

Judging by your post I'm going to assume that you don't currently own a USP. If you liked the USP and may be thinking about purchasing one, I'd suggest also taking a look at the HK 45 while your at it. It's an newer design with improved ergonomics and a larger magazine release paddle built into the trigger guard.

Rushing
04-23-15, 15:17
The only HK pistols I was able to try was the USP in 9 and 45 and the VP9. I'm not too sure if they have the HK45 for rental like the other pistols, but I'll look into it.
When I first held it and shot off a few rounds I liked it a lot compared to some other pistols. Mostly because it felt like an actual pistol and met up with my expectations of what a handgun is like.
I'm still looking forward to purchasing the VP9, if I am able to find it for a good price. One store has it for close to $700.00 and that's the standard version.

For me, I kind of got into HK pistols after watching a scene from Collateral starring Tom Cruise and Jamie Foxx.

Bayern
04-23-15, 16:35
I have a HK Compact in .45 cal. Best weapon (pistol) I've owned. Better then a Glock 36 which I got rid of because of feeding problems. I swear the HK would shoot a brick out of it. I've even used semi-wad cutters with no problem. Just a great gun. It was my duty weapon until I retired a little over 4 yrs ago and I got to keep it.

jck397
04-24-15, 01:15
They need to scrap the 2000 and just update the usp with a standard glock style rail. I chose the p2000 rather then the p30 because I like a rail but not a picatinny rail on a carry gun.

I agree. The over built design for +P ammo, the better trigger, the ability to switch between variants, and the ability to remove the lockout device make the USPc a better gun, IMO. I just wish H&K would do 4 things as a company:

1) Update the rails on the USP line
2) Make the next VP pistol G19-sized
3) Offer a choice between push-button and lever magazines like Walther does with the PPQ (particularly since some people (like me) dump mags out of the H&Ks with the longer releases)
4) Offer a true civilian version of the 416 (not a handgun topic, but since I'm dreaming, dream big, right?)

I think that the USP line are some of the finest handguns around, and I just need one or two things from my list to woo me away from Glock.

Nowski87
04-24-15, 10:50
So after seeing this thread and visiting my LGS I now own a full size USP 9mm. It was built in 94, is there anything that needs to be changed or replaced at this point? The safety is very stiff what can be done about that?

faster200
04-25-15, 08:36
My BC date code USP9 had a pretty stiff safety out of the box, and it got even worse when I changed over to an ambi. What I discovered is that the grove the detent plate moves in on the safety axle had a few small burrs in it. I used a small jewelers file and removed the burrs. Now the safety engages, dis-engages and de-cocks smoothly. I'm disappointed that a 90 dollar part had to be finished, but the end result is exactly what I wanted. As a '94 run it could also just need a tear down and re-lube.

Outlander Systems
04-25-15, 08:53
Before I sold my USP, I shot ~2000 rounds trough it...in one day.

Sumbitch never choked. If HK would update it with a standard accessory rail, this would be, in my opinion, the finest side iron ever made.

HKfreak
04-26-15, 10:34
Before I sold my USP, I shot ~2000 rounds trough it...in one day.

Sumbitch never choked. If HK would update it with a standard accessory rail, this would be, in my opinion, the finest side iron ever made.
Love this post. A 1913 rail would make it almost impossible to be beaten.

And for those who call it an Oversized Boat Anchor....

Love my OBAs

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/04/26/5efc81db679450f4227e6b158e268fdf.jpg

Outlander Systems
04-26-15, 10:40
Love this post. A 1913 rail would make it almost impossible to be beaten.

And for those who call it an Oversized Boat Anchor....

Love my OBAs

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/04/26/5efc81db679450f4227e6b158e268fdf.jpg

I was consolidating down to 9mm, and figured, rather than sell it, to have some fun.

The USP series of pistols are probably the nicest factory handguns ever made. They are phenomenal weapons.

HKfreak
04-26-15, 10:42
I was consolidating down to 9mm, and figured, rather than sell it, to have some fun.

The USP series of pistols are probably the nicest factory handguns ever made. They are phenomenal weapons.
The USP you fired 2000 through in a day was a 45 I'm assuming?

HK fired 20k rounds through a USP45 in one weekend without any parts breakages.

SiGfever
04-26-15, 10:44
My USPc .40S&W is one of my favorite pistols. It points and shoots great plus it is an H&K which means you can...take it to war, fire all your bullets, beat the enemy to death with the pistol, and bring it home to pass it down to generations to come.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/01/robert-farago/hk45-endurance-test-what-minor-problems-might-those-be/

Which is NOT a record for the HK45. I wish I could find the thread where a lady at H&K factory stated one test pistol had a couple hundred thousand rounds through it without major work.

Outlander Systems
04-26-15, 11:10
The USP you fired 2000 through in a day was a 45 I'm assuming?

HK fired 20k rounds through a USP45 in one weekend without any parts breakages.

It was.

That doesn't surprise me in the least. I would trust my life to an HK all day long, and twice on Sunday.

Marty w
04-26-15, 11:28
I bought my USP45 in the mid nineties new and it's been one of my favorites ever since. It's just an incredible pistol. It's a big gun, but I'm a big guy. I prefer the paddle mag release. The USP is one of the best guns on the planet IMO. Never had one issue with mine either, by the way. It's been flawless.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hwikek
04-26-15, 16:29
As an HK fan I have to say I don't see why you'd get a USP nowadays when there are P30s and HK45s as well as the P30sk and the P2000. Unless you need a USP 45 for the extra capacity over the HK45 then I don't see what the USP series does that a newer HK design does not. Can someone fill me in on the rationale? The only thing I can think of is the match grade trigger.

HKfreak
04-26-15, 16:39
As an HK fan I have to say I don't see why you'd get a USP nowadays when there are P30s and HK45s as well as the P30sk and the P2000. Unless you need a USP 45 for the extra capacity over the HK45 then I don't see what the USP series does that a newer HK design does not. Can someone fill me in on the rationale? The only thing I can think of is the match grade trigger.
The stock USP trigger is WAY better than the P30s trigger. Its not even debatable.

As far as USP45 and HK45. Its personal preference. IMO the USP45 shoots softer HK45 stays flatter (lower bore axis) the HK45 holds 10, USP45 12. The HK45 has the better grip and 1913 rail, USP45 is more modular and easier to detail strip.

For the record. I own both :)

Hwikek
04-26-15, 17:39
I'm not super familiar with the USP lineup since I don't own any but how is the 45 variant more modular? I know lots of people seem to get hung up on triggers but I don't really have any issues with triggers that feel bad so long as I can physically pull them. The only triggers that I really profess to disliking are the ones I've felt on a few double action revolvers but I haven't used those enough to form an useful opinions on whether that is inherent to a revolver or just random chance of getting a few perfectly bad triggers. A better trigger is certainly nicer but I don't see why that would cancel out other reasons to own a line of guns.

scootle
04-27-15, 16:11
Nice OP. This thread might get some new life for a short while with this recent limited run of stainless USPc pistols making its way into the market. Thanks for sharing this!

Rushing
04-27-15, 19:02
The USP is kind of like the second sibling to the Mark 23. The Mark 23 is a much bigger gun to the USP and they have similar details.
The controls of the pistols are or were meant mostly with gloved hands in mind, which is why they are big.
Like HKFreak mentioned, it is personal preference between the USP45 and HK45.
There's also a video review between the two that was pretty detailed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y19B4tXGoFk

If I were to get a polymer frame gun in 45 ACP it would either be the USP or Glock 21. Not too familiar with FNH in 45, but there's much research to look into for that.
Anyway, I think it would be cool if the USP could use the more recent mag release paddles (a bit longer and wider, even though there is aftermarket mag release for USP), better rail system, and maybe ambidextrous controls for slide release.
Overall it was a fun pistol to shoot in 45 and I would definitely want to get my hands on one.

FishTaco
04-29-15, 18:35
I have a .40 USP compact with the factory LEM option and I can't imagine EVER using this pistol in DAO. Trigger pull is insane, feels like about 20-24 pounds.

scootle
04-29-15, 19:18
I have a .40 USP compact with the factory LEM option and I can't imagine EVER using this pistol in DAO. Trigger pull is insane, feels like about 20-24 pounds.

How does the factory LEM option compare to what I've seen mentioned as "light" LEM configuration? I'm not a huge fan of DA/SA, so I am very motivated to look into changing my pending USPc into a LEM variant.

Serpico1985
04-29-15, 20:26
A good way to think of a LEM trigger is this: a DA/SA trigger that de-cocks itself every time you release the trigger.

The light lem triggers can easily get into the mid 4lb range depending on the particular HK gun you have. 4 springs affect the trigger weight: trigger return spring, hammer spring, firing pin block spring and the sear spring.

Serpico1985
04-29-15, 20:32
I have a .40 USP compact with the factory LEM option and I can't imagine EVER using this pistol in DAO. Trigger pull is insane, feels like about 20-24 pounds.

There is no DOA with the lem trigger. What you are describing is what would happen if the gun got a round with a light primer and instead of racking the slide to correct the issue, you tried to simply pull the trigger again (known as second strike capability). You would never utilize that excessily heavy trigger. Think about it, when you load the gun the trigger is the normal trigger weight, not the DOA you describe. There is no way to decock a LEM trigger.

FishTaco
04-29-15, 23:03
There is no DOA with the lem trigger. What you are describing is what would happen if the gun got a round with a light primer and instead of racking the slide to correct the issue, you tried to simply pull the trigger again (known as second strike capability). You would never utilize that excessily heavy trigger. Think about it, when you load the gun the trigger is the normal trigger weight, not the DOA you describe. There is no way to decock a LEM trigger.

Good points all. So, what is the trigger pull like on a USP DAO without the LEM feature? Is it not the awfulness I've described?

FishTaco
04-29-15, 23:05
How does the factory LEM option compare to what I've seen mentioned as "light" LEM configuration? I'm not a huge fan of DA/SA, so I am very motivated to look into changing my pending USPc into a LEM variant.

My understanding is that the LEM modification is strictly for DAO pistols to make the pull manageable. I don't think they're directly comparable to the DA/SA. If I had to guess, the LEM modification is for PD's that mandate Double Action. I would think DA/SA is the only way to go if you had a choice.

Any experts that know this for sure please chime in!

Serpico1985
04-30-15, 07:24
My understanding is that the LEM modification is strictly for DAO pistols to make the pull manageable. I don't think they're directly comparable to the DA/SA. If I had to guess, the LEM modification is for PD's that mandate Double Action. I would think DA/SA is the only way to go if you had a choice.

Any experts that know this for sure please chime in!

DAO is an available trigger option from HK (variant 5 and 6). However, with the availability of the LEM trigger I don't know why anyone would want it. It is probably only there to satisfy random backwards thinking departments that mandate a certain heavy trigger weight and consistent trigger pull, think NYPD with the heavy NY springs in their glocks.

I think LEM is superior to DA/SA in a few ways. First off people involved in shootings don't usually remember how heavy a trigger pull is but they do remember how long it is. With a LEM trigger you get the length of the DA pull but at a much more manageable weight (anywhere from 4.5-8lbs depending on spring combo). Plus once you get through the first long trigger pull you have a short reset for fast follow up shots basically identical to a DA/SA. Then, with the LEM you simply release the trigger and it is the equivalent of de-cocking a DA/SA gun.

With a DA/SA in the role of law enforcement you can imagine a situation where an officer fires a few shots and then needs to immediately re-holster and go hands on. It is easy to see in that situation where you may holster in SA forgetting to de-cock. In the same situation with a LEM you would simply release the trigger and the trigger goes fully forward thus ensuring that when you need it again your back to the long first pull.

These are just my thoughts and have been stated on other forums in the past.


Excellent reading on this subject:

http://pistol-training.com/archives/8549