PDA

View Full Version : Cane and Derby Magazine Pouch Review



matt7184
02-21-11, 23:40
Since about 2006, I have pretty exclusively been running Raven Concealment (I’ve had about 9 of their holsters and 2 magazine pouches) or Safariland Holsters (ALS and SLS models) and CompTac and Ready Tactical Magazine pouches. I also have/had an assortment of Kydex gear from Bladetech and CompTac which I have used for prior to acquiring Raven gear in 2006. All of my past gear has been used in training sessions, drills, and formal classes. Recently I received a T&E Magazine Pouch with Easy On and Off Cantiloop Clips from my friends at Cane and Derby Inc (CDI) and ever since I have been using this CDI magazine carrier pretty exclusively for concealed carry. From using it almost daily for the last 4 or so weeks, I really think it is the best set up out there for a concealment magazine pouch and it comes with easy on and off capability.

In essence, this magazine pouch gives me the best blend of convenience, security, and concealability. You know the saying do you want a car that is fast, good gas mileage, and affordable...well you can't have it now pick 2...well I have seen the same thing in terms of magazine pouches. Except now I do have all 3.

Convenience: I like easy on off clips because of convenience. I often need to get my gear on and off during the work week and for me, it is a requirement to have some type of easy on and off capability whether it is a Kydex Clip or Rubber/Leather Belt Loop (and with magazine pouches OWB, your main option is pretty much a Kydex or Metal Clip). I refused to use the past T&E CDI Magazine Pouches because they lacked this capability, because they were standard Kydex belt loops which need to be threaded [Note: If easy on and off does not matter to you, the CDI belt loop Magazine Pouches are the best out there in my opinion and ARE modular and can use the Easy On Off Cantiloop Clips or standard CDI Belt Loops). Some of my belts also make it very hard to thread through a belt loop. Easy on off clips allow me to get my pants on and then throw my pouches/holsters on. If I need to get it on or off, it isn't as easy as the single clip designs (such as CompTac or Ready Tactical), but it does give me more security and concealability.

The high convenience of getting the very easy on and off with a single clip design is nice and convenient, but also causes issues with Security and Concealability, which I would rather avoid if possible. With the two clip Cantiloop design, I have found that it is negligibly slower to get off or on. I simply clip one side in and then the other and in reverse to get it off.

Security: Because of the double hook design, there are now two points that need to fail rather than one to have the magazine pouch become inoperable. The single clip design while convenient, is not secure enough for me. I wear my belts rather tight and still have had the single clip pouches come off during speed reloads. I have had both CompTac and Ready Tactical mag pouches come off during speed reloads. It's quite embarrassing in front of a whole class while running an El Presidente...but in the real world, if my magazine pouch comes off with the magazine, it makes one more step for me to speed reload the gun (strip magazine pouch off magazine with one hand on the magazine). In a time is life situation, every second counts.

The one failure point also allows the clip to snap or bend and cause a magazine carrier to become totally useless. This is in part due to the bulky design of the single clip magazine pouches. This may not be a big deal for some who are willing to sacrifice concealability, but I have had issues because of my magazine pouch sticking out so much, such as in office chairs and with car seats. With cars with prominent side bolster seats, magazine pouches which stick out far cause me to be uncomfortable. I have also had a Ready Tactical magazine pouch bend when it hit the arm of my office chair while sitting down. That bend was enough to make the Ready Tactical Pouch useless.

Concealability: The CDI Easy On/Off Magazine pouches are lower profile and have a smaller footprint than the past concealability king from Raven Concealment, while not sacrificing convenience or security. I feel that Raven Pouches are secure due to the belt loop design and they are low profile compared to the single clip designs from CompTac and Ready Tactical, but they are not convenient for me to get on or off at all. To get my magazine pouch off, when carrying a firearm, I have to unthread the belt and place my firearms somewhere secure and then rethread the belt back. While not a big deal to some, it is to me. Also, the CDI magazine pouches offer a smaller footprint and the patent pending Cantiloop clip design also pulls the magazine pouch (or holster) in tighter than the Raven Concealment Pouches (or their clones). Without question, the CDI Magazine Pouches offer the flatest lowest profile of any magazine pouch I have used.

Company Webpage: http://www.caneandderby.com/


http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/7628/img20110221235925.th.jpg (http://img27.imageshack.us/i/img20110221235925.jpg/)

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/1853/img20110222000036.th.jpg (http://img218.imageshack.us/i/img20110222000036.jpg/)

From Left to Right: Comp-Tac, CDI, Ready Tactical
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/8518/img20110222000935.th.jpg (http://img823.imageshack.us/i/img20110222000935.jpg/)

OldGreg
02-22-11, 09:04
That's a great write-up... thank you for taking the time to do that.

rob_s
02-22-11, 09:08
Where's mine? :eek:

willowofwisp
02-22-11, 09:18
Thanks for the write up I may have to buy a set.

gillian_seed
02-22-11, 10:57
Great write up I'm seriously considering buying of these! Couple questions though. Did you test the super slim line pouch, or just the regular mag pouch? And do you think it would be worth it to get the slimmer option?

matt7184
02-22-11, 22:37
Great write up I'm seriously considering buying of these! Couple questions though. Did you test the super slim line pouch, or just the regular mag pouch? And do you think it would be worth it to get the slimmer option?

Thanks for the kind comments gents. The magazine pouches I am testing are from the Super Slim Line (SSL). Everyones needs are different, and the mission drives the gear, but for concealed carry use I recommend the SSL line. It is thinner without sacrificing anything in durability for daily carry in my opinion. Now if you want to run something on say a battle belt, then I would look into the standard line that has thicker kydex.

VolGrad
02-23-11, 08:48
I like the look of that pouch. Like you said, threading/un-threading sucks. I have pulled a pouch off my belt during a speed re-load a couple of times in class (Comp-Tac). That experience made me abandon clip over type pouches for my primary setup. I like the fact CDI uses two clips ... added stability/security and it seems it would hold more snugly against the body.

Tennvol12345
03-07-11, 19:29
I spoke with Ian at length about the SSL vs the standard holster and he indicated that for my specific situation (700-100K rounds of 9mm/45 per week) I should not opt for the SSL due to the durability issues, this included mag pouches. I did change my holster order to a standard Paradus and kept my mag pouch as a SSL. I figure if I break it CDI will fix it.

Of course your requirements may differ. Now if only they would ship my stuff (ordered a few weeks ago).

Oh and VolGrad.....I feel for you down in Athens... representing the Power T behind enemy lines.

513224
03-07-11, 20:57
I spoke with Ian at length about the SSL vs the standard holster and he indicated that for my specific situation (700-100K rounds of 9mm/45 per week) I should not opt for the SSL due to the durability issues, this included mag pouches. I did change my holster order to a standard Paradus and kept my mag pouch as a SSL. I figure if I break it CDI will fix it.

Of course your requirements may differ. Now if only they would ship my stuff (ordered a few weeks ago).


Yeah, I asked the same thing about CDI's SSL products (called them up), but I got a slightly different answer. The SSL thing is a bit confusing...

The rep I spoke to told me that the SSL holsters (not the mag pouches) are intended for light to medium duty, but that if I was going to use the holster on the range, for training, etc, that the standard-thickness Pardus would be more appropriate. The SSL mag pouches, on the other hand, are good for range or concealment use - the only reason to get a standard thickness mag pouch is to get the mag pouch in a color other than black, or possibly if it's going to be severely abused.

By the way, I would advise anybody who has questions to call these guys directly - their customer service is freakin' great.

SmokeJumper
03-07-11, 23:51
Great review!

Tennvol12345
03-08-11, 20:24
Eh, who knows. I've been working with Ian on a few ideas I had for short people like me. Typical mag pouches stick up too high and force me to lean to the strong side to get the mag out easier. Can you comment on the height of the SSL mag pouch vs others, such as RCS?

I ended up switching my holster from the SSL to the Paradus since I OWB carry a MP9C when I mountain bike, and sometimes the holster can take a pretty hard hit against a tree, or mother earth when I eat sh!t.

For day to day carry I AIWB in a CCC Shaggy and I think the CDI offering will fix what I feel is a design issue in the Shaggy....more of a footprint to help with weight distribution.

Heard from Ian that my kydex is all done and they are just waiting on some screws and such to come in.

matt7184
03-08-11, 23:20
There is no issue with the CDI Mag Pouches for short people (I am 5'8"). The pistol magazine pouches ride fine (I don't have the RCS here, but I believe the CDI is a touch lower) and the T&E Rifle Mag Carriers are specifically designed to not ride high and in the armpit like some other magazine carriers position the magazine.

I recommend a non SSL holster for hard use. Just remember, any holster out there will break if you abuse it enough.

I actually am T&E a CDI Appendix Rig Prototype as well. Comments about it here:
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=17903&page=34

steve126a
04-12-11, 15:54
Excellent write-up! I had not even heard of this company until now. Looks like quality stuff!

Randy Lee
04-13-11, 10:28
I am 5'5" and the CDI mag pouch is comfortable for all day wear. Far more comfortable and concealable than any that I have tried/worn to date. I have the dual belt loops on mine and wear a 5.11 trainer belt daily.

The design eliminates the single point pressure against my waistline and hipbone that I have experienced with other carriers. In driving from Nashville to NC this past week I experienced ZERO discomfort. I made the same trip last year with another brand clip on and the trip was miserable.

A truly outstanding product!

-Randy

FFK
04-14-11, 22:06
Does anyone know what lead times Cane and Derby has right now?

Irish
04-15-11, 16:56
After reading yours and several other positive reviews of Cane & Derby's gear I just placed an order over the phone with Ian. I have nothing but positive things to say about our conversation, pleasant, professional and pretty funny anecdotes as well.

I ordered the Pardus w/IWB loops, their appendix holster and an SSL mag holder. Approximate lead time given to me was 4 weeks.