PDA

View Full Version : veterans disarmament act ??



Sweep
09-24-07, 16:06
another member just posted this over at FSN :mad:



VETERANS DISARMAMENT ACT TO BAR VETS FROM OWNING GUNS


By Larry Pratt
September 22, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

Hundreds of thousands of veterans -- from Vietnam through Operation Iraqi Freedom -- are at risk of being banned from buying firearms if legislation that is pending in Congress gets enacted.

How? The Veterans Disarmament Act -- which has already passed the House -- would place any veteran who has ever been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) on the federal gun ban list.

This is exactly what President Bill Clinton did over seven years ago when his administration illegitimately added some 83,000 veterans into the National Criminal Information System (NICS system) -- prohibiting them from purchasing firearms, simply because of afflictions like PTSD.

The proposed ban is actually broader. Anyone who is diagnosed as being a tiny danger to himself or others would have his gun rights taken away ... forever. It is section 102(b)(1)(C)(iv) in HR 2640 that provides for dumping raw medical records into the system. Those names -- like the 83,000 records mentioned above -- will then, by law, serve as the basis for gun banning.

No wonder the Military Order of the Purple Heart is opposed to this legislation.

The House bill, HR 2640, is being sponsored by one of the most flaming anti-Second Amendment Representatives in Congress: Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY). Another liberal anti-gunner, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), is sponsoring the bill in the Senate.

Proponents of the bill say that helpful amendments have been made so that any veteran who gets his name on the NICS list can seek an expungement.

But whenever you talk about expunging names from the Brady NICS system, you’re talking about a procedure that has always been a long shot. Right now, there are NO EXPUNGEMENTS of law-abiding Americans’ names that are taking place under federal level. Why? Because the expungement process which already exists has been blocked for over a decade by a "funds cut-off" engineered by another anti-gunner, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY).

So how will this bill make things even worse? Well, two legal terms are radically redefined in the Veterans Disarmament Act to carry out this vicious attack on veterans’ gun rights.

One term relates to who is classified a "mental defective." Forty years ago that term meant one was adjudicated "not guilty" in a court of law by reason of insanity. But under the Veterans Disarmament Act, "mental defective" has been stretched to include anyone whom a psychiatrist determines might be a tiny danger to self or others.

The second term is "adjudicate." In the past, one could only lose one's gun rights through an adjudication by a judge, magistrate or court -- meaning conviction after a trial. Adjudication could only occur in a court with all the protections of due process, including the right to face one's accuser. Now, adjudication in HR 2640 would include a finding by "a court, commission, committee or other authorized person" (namely, a psychiatrist).

Forget the fact that people with PTSD have the same violent crime rate as the rest of us. Vietnam vets with PTSD have had careers and obtained permits to carry firearms concealed. It will now be enough for a psychiatric diagnosis (a "determination" in the language of the bill) to get a veteran barred *for life * from owning guns.

Think of what this bill would do to veterans. If a robber grabs your wallet and takes everything in it, but gives you back $5 to take the bus home, would you call that a financial enhancement? If not, then we should not let HR 2640 supporters call the permission to seek an expungement an enhancement, when prior to this bill, veterans could not legitimately be denied their gun rights after being diagnosed with PTSD.

Veterans with PTSD should not be put in a position to seek an expungement. They have not been convicted (after a trial with due process) of doing anything wrong. If a veteran is thought to be a threat to self or others, there should be a real trial, not an opinion (called a diagnosis) by a psychiatrist.

If members of Congress do not hear from soldiers (active duty and retired) in large numbers, along with the rest of the public, the Veterans Disarmament Act -- misleadingly titled by Rep. McCarthy as the NICS Improvement Amendments Act -- will send this message to veterans: "No good deed goes unpunished."

© 2007 Larry Pratt - All Rights Reserved

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale


Larry Pratt has been Executive Director of Gun Owners of America for 27 years. GOA is a national membership organization of 300,000 Americans dedicated to promoting their second amendment freedom to keep and bear arms.

He published a book, Armed People Victorious, in 1990 and was editor of a book, Safeguarding Liberty: The Constitution & Militias, 1995. His latest book, On the Firing Line: Essays in the Defense of Liberty was published in 2001.

The GOA web site is: gunowners.org. Pratt's weekly talk show Live Fire is archived there at: www.gunowners.org/radio.htm

E-Mail: ldpratt@gunowners.org

Either Pratt or another GOA spokesman is available for press interviews.

CobraCutterPB
09-25-07, 14:56
I dont see what someone in that situation doesnt sue for an injunction. Seems to me like a SC case like this would give us some momentum.

FJB
09-25-07, 23:30
Pat Leahy is an SOB. He released Top Secret information during the late '80s when we were performing GOPLAT missions in the Persian Gulf. He was sitting on the Senate CIA Sub-Committee and disagreed with what President Reagan was doing. So he allowed a Top Secret document to be leaked that lead to the deaths of numerous foreign operatives. All that happened was that they removed him from that committee. If anyone in the military had done that they would deservedly still be sitting in Leavenworth.

Leahy's son hated him so much he joined the Marine Corps reserves and served in 1st Bn, 25th Marines just to piss off his dad. He was in the same platoon and company with my brother. However, the fruit didn't fall far from the tree and Leahy's son was a turd. When my brother's unit was activated for Desert Shield/Desert Storm Leahy had his son transferred to a base job at Camp Pendleton while the rest of the unit deployed to Saudi then fought into Kuwait.

Bottomline is that Leahy is a turd and doesn't represent real Vermonters only the liberal trash that have migrated to Vermont and are subsequently destroying the state politically and economically.

S/F

FWIW. The preceeding are my opinions alone and not those of Aimpoint or anyone else that I may be associated.

Joseywales
09-26-07, 18:40
Unfortunately, my senators are both big "D's" (Dumbasses) But I sent a letter anyway. May the "D" party burn in hell

Mac679
09-26-07, 21:55
Great, so now vets who try to get help are going to get ****ed out of the rights that we've spent signifcant portions of our lives dodging IEDs, rockets, RPGs, mortars, SAF, and ambushes to bring to another country....

The thanks of a greatful leadership....

gunny
09-26-07, 22:40
Rediculous. I'm not ashamed to admit I have service connected PTSD. However, it doesn't keep me from leading a normal & productive life nor does it affect me from serving as a leo. It's an acquired emotional disorder not a mental illness. It can lead to mental illnesses, but there's a big difference & our elected officials should know better. Simply amazing.