Larue LT-100 or RCO mount for TA11 ACOG?

[kaltesherz]

I'm picking up a TA11 from a fellow member and was curious as to what luck you guys have had with either Larue mount. As the TA11 is a bit of a big girl (she shops at Torrid and has a tendency to make out with me at last call) I figured the LT-100 would have a better return to zero. I'll be using an Aimpoint on my upper 90% of the time but when longer range is called for I'll be throwing the ACOG on.

[nimdabew]

Mine works with my 31F just fine.

[kaltesherz]

Which model works on your 31F? I'm asking LT-100 vs RCO mount

[JSantoro]

Either will work well, though if the RCO mount has an advantage, it lies in the fact that one can backset the optic on the receiver and have a better chance of getting their desired eye relief when using a fixed stock and wearing armor.

Given that the eye relief on the TA11 is about an inch MORE than the TA31, that's less likely to be a need.

RTZ? Either will give you that, though if that's the primary concern, going for the one with two throw-arms isn't unreasonable.

[armakraut]

RCO, lighter, more versatile mount.

[Failure2Stop]

I have found no issue with getting a TA11 in correct position with the LT-100, and the dual levers make me feel all warm and fuzzy.
I have no experience with the RCO mount with a TA11, and only cursory use with a TA31, which did a good job of bringing the nasty little 31 back far enough on a M16A4 to be usable while wearing armor.

[kaltesherz]

Thanks guys, I think I'll stick with the LT-100, while the RCO is cheaper and lighter it was primarily designed for eye relief that I don't need... I'll stick with the extra lever... two is one right?