Nephrology
05-24-11, 21:59
I have posted about this buddy of mine before. He is a generally very good shooter and knows his way around a pistol, but lately he has developed...something of a problem.
I traded a G21 with him for a G17 + cash and ammo, which was fine by me - couldn't afford regular practice with .45 anyway. next, he picked up a Glock 32 to replace the G30 that he regularly carried. All this is, by itself, not really a big deal.
Now, however, he has a new "plan" to make himself... well, something.
He is going to buy a Lone Wolf long slide + barrel assembly for the Glock 21 in .40 Super, which he plans on using for home defense. His plan is to buy 100 rds of .40 Super, shoot 50, keep the rest and call it a day.
He is also planning on buying a long slide assembly + a .357SIG and 9mm barrel for his Glock 32. His goal is to *carry* this pistol, with the long slide and all, and he expects to shoot mostly 9mm through the long-slide compact frankengun. I doubt he will put more than 250 rds tops through the .357SIG + slide. He even told me rather bluntly that he does not plan to carry or do much of anything at all with the stock Glock 32 slide+bbl assembly. His entire premise is to as much as possible approximate rifle ballistics out of a handgun (paraphrased). I have tried to explain to him this thing called "bullet design" but I do not get far.
So.... this is a bad idea. Obviously. He is completely taking the reliability of his defensive pistols for granted in exchange for some sort of imagined increase in lethality that I suppose he thinks comes with .357SIG and .40 Super. I do not know how to talk to him. Every time I bring up something even as innocuous as "...better run a lot of ammo through that long slide .357 SIG!" (Which is about as much enthusiasm as I can muster) he just kind of shuts down and pretends I didn't say anything.
I know there can be a lot of ego involved in firearms taste and selection, especially when self defense comes into play, but this is ridiculous. I think he is being genuinely unsafe and is putting his life in jeopardy. How can I approach him, in a constructive way, to convince him to stay away from this? I have tried to show him some of Doctor Roberts' gel tests and, as before, he selectively interprets evidence to support his predetermined conclusions. It is frustrating. I am kind of tempted to just wait for him to blow up one of his guns before I broach the subject again, but I would like to be a better friend than that...
I traded a G21 with him for a G17 + cash and ammo, which was fine by me - couldn't afford regular practice with .45 anyway. next, he picked up a Glock 32 to replace the G30 that he regularly carried. All this is, by itself, not really a big deal.
Now, however, he has a new "plan" to make himself... well, something.
He is going to buy a Lone Wolf long slide + barrel assembly for the Glock 21 in .40 Super, which he plans on using for home defense. His plan is to buy 100 rds of .40 Super, shoot 50, keep the rest and call it a day.
He is also planning on buying a long slide assembly + a .357SIG and 9mm barrel for his Glock 32. His goal is to *carry* this pistol, with the long slide and all, and he expects to shoot mostly 9mm through the long-slide compact frankengun. I doubt he will put more than 250 rds tops through the .357SIG + slide. He even told me rather bluntly that he does not plan to carry or do much of anything at all with the stock Glock 32 slide+bbl assembly. His entire premise is to as much as possible approximate rifle ballistics out of a handgun (paraphrased). I have tried to explain to him this thing called "bullet design" but I do not get far.
So.... this is a bad idea. Obviously. He is completely taking the reliability of his defensive pistols for granted in exchange for some sort of imagined increase in lethality that I suppose he thinks comes with .357SIG and .40 Super. I do not know how to talk to him. Every time I bring up something even as innocuous as "...better run a lot of ammo through that long slide .357 SIG!" (Which is about as much enthusiasm as I can muster) he just kind of shuts down and pretends I didn't say anything.
I know there can be a lot of ego involved in firearms taste and selection, especially when self defense comes into play, but this is ridiculous. I think he is being genuinely unsafe and is putting his life in jeopardy. How can I approach him, in a constructive way, to convince him to stay away from this? I have tried to show him some of Doctor Roberts' gel tests and, as before, he selectively interprets evidence to support his predetermined conclusions. It is frustrating. I am kind of tempted to just wait for him to blow up one of his guns before I broach the subject again, but I would like to be a better friend than that...