"iTac" 30 round polymer mags

[Slater]

Another company on the polymer mag bandwagon, although I just recently heard of them. A bit more pricey than the average P-Mag. Anyone familiar?:

http://itacdefense.com/ShowProductDetails.aspx?ProductID=18&CategoryID=23

[eternal24k]

they are crap, same thing Sig rifles come with. Been around for awhile.

[1911-A1]

Looks like most of the stuff on their site is the same stuff Sig sells, just re-branded. They have the light/VFG unit, the mini-aimpoint clone, etc.

[kmc0929]

Other way around, iTac is the source for Sig Sauer's accessories.

[strambo]

Sheesh...you can almost get 3 GI aluminum mags with Magpul followers for the price of 1 of those. http://dsgarms.com/ProductInfo/MA-02DSGG10.aspx $8.50 ea.

[Moose-Knuckle]

iTAC = No Go.

Correct, Sig USA peddles their shit and include some of their accessories with their firearms. I use to own a 556, it came with one USGI 30 rounder. I bought a pair of the "Sig" mags just to have for the "Sig" 556. They are on the same level as the old IDF Orlites. Save yourself the money and problems, avoid them.

[fireblast713]

If they're more expensive than PMAGs and you can't even be sure they're as good as PMAGs I'd stay away, kinda like the Lancer L5A mags, I hear good things I hear bad things, but they're $19 each compared to $12 for a non windowed pmag and $14-15 for a windowed one, so why take the chance?

[Charlie Don't Surf]

nevermind

[devinsdad]

And people bitch that the Army stopped allowing the troops from using polymer magazines...wanna know why?? For EXACTLY the reasons listed above. Not every Soldier was buying Magpul PMAG's or Troy Battlemags. Many were buying this crap because "it's the same as every other plastic mag" and they were cheaper. Good for the Army for saying "NO MORE" and making a big boy decision