kal
10-30-07, 23:11
Since this is a more serious forum with lots of experienced military personnel, I would like to gain further knowledge on the designated marksman rifle doctrine.
I hear many times that a semi auto 7.62mm NATO is the best choice for DMR use but then I end up seeing M16A4's being used as DMR's (replacing the M21's???). I take a look at other countries and they seem to have followed the same route. The Germans, I believe, use a standard G36 as a DMR, the Brits use the L86 as a DMR, and the Swedes use their version of the FNC as a DMR, if I recall correctly.
I'm wondering, is the standardization of magazines and ammo, and probably most importantly the platform, more desirable than just simply having a bigger caliber? Or is it because at typical engagement ranges, the 5.56x45mm (77gr?) and 7.62x51mm have too similar terminal performance to break standardization?
Basically, are the 7.62mm DMR's being pushed into more specialized roles and the 5.56mm DMR's becoming commonplace because of their organic nature with the rest of the squads small arms and munition type?
I hear many times that a semi auto 7.62mm NATO is the best choice for DMR use but then I end up seeing M16A4's being used as DMR's (replacing the M21's???). I take a look at other countries and they seem to have followed the same route. The Germans, I believe, use a standard G36 as a DMR, the Brits use the L86 as a DMR, and the Swedes use their version of the FNC as a DMR, if I recall correctly.
I'm wondering, is the standardization of magazines and ammo, and probably most importantly the platform, more desirable than just simply having a bigger caliber? Or is it because at typical engagement ranges, the 5.56x45mm (77gr?) and 7.62x51mm have too similar terminal performance to break standardization?
Basically, are the 7.62mm DMR's being pushed into more specialized roles and the 5.56mm DMR's becoming commonplace because of their organic nature with the rest of the squads small arms and munition type?