Charging Handle
09-09-11, 14:33
I thought I would start this discussion since I'm in the process of standardizing my .223 carbine defensive ammo. Obviously I'm not the first person who has considered the issue of trying to find an inexpensive training round that matches the trajectory and POI of my defensive load as closely as possible at various distances. I understand that from 0-100 yards, most ammo from 55-75 grain will be close enough to remain useful. But if I could find a combination that will keep me in the kill zone of a standard silhouette type target out to 200 or 300 yards, that would be terrific.
Certainly, most of my training takes place at distances of 100 yards or less. But I also train to take longer shots and keep my skills sharp in that area. As a civilian, it is unlikely that I'll need to take a defensive shot at such distances, but I'd prefer having the capability, since it may be the bad guy who makes the decision about what distance an engagement takes place, not me. Besides, it seems the whole point of having a carbine/rifle is to give you a platform capable of good accuracy and performance beyond 100 yards, otherwise we'd all just use a 12 gauge with buckshot and slugs.
So, with my stated goals in mind, I'd like to find a good quality defensive load high on DocGKR's approved list as my primary defensive ammunition, and a cheap, widely available FMJ round that matches the ballistics of the defensive load as closely as possible from 0-300 yards that won't require re-zeroing when switching between the two. I am hoping someone here has already contemplated this issue and found a solution they can share with me.
Some of the possible combos I'm looking at include:
Option A
Defensive Load: Federal/Black Hills/Barnes .223 55 gr TSX
Training Load: Federal/Fiocchi/UMC/PMC/Wolf .223 55 gr FMJ
Option B
Defensive Load: Federal Tactical/Federal Fusion .223 62 gr JSP
Training Load: Prvi Partizan/Winchester USA/Wolf .223 62 gr FMJ
Option C
Defensive Load: Speer 5.56mm 55 gr Gold Dot
Training Load: Federal/Winchester/Prvi/PMC/IMI 55 gr M193 FMJ
Option D
Defensive Load: Federal Mk318 5.56mm 62 gr SOST
Training Load: Federal/Winchester/Prvi/PMC/IMI 62 gr M855
Option E
Defensive Load: Hornady .223 75 gr OTM TAP
Training Load: Hornady .223 75 gr OTM Steel Case practice ammo
It appears those are the options to give me the best chance of finding what I'm looking for, although enough variances still exist between some of them to perhaps make some less ideal than others.
Also, the load I would otherwise most favor for defensive use (Black Hills 5.56mm 50 gr TSX #D556N1) seems the least likely of the approved defensive loads to have a similar performing, inexpensive, training counterpart. Maybe M193 would suffice? Perhaps the Federal 50 gr value pack JHP? I dunno. One is heavier. The other is .223 spec and has considerably less velocity.
Again, I figure this is an issue many people have contemplated before. So feel free to offer suggestions based on your experiences. Also, FWIW, I am leaning more toward a barrier blind load. While such a load may not be as critical for civilian self defense as for law enforcement duties, one also can't rule out such a need. Even without auto bodies and windshields to contend with, things such as interior doors, pieces of furniture, windows or even the bones within an arm that may be in front of the torso of your attacker could make a barrier blind load a much better choice. It simply works effectively in more situations.
Thanks in advance for suggestions and discussion. I apologize for being a bit overly detailed in my post, but there was quite a bit of ground to cover. Perhaps this post can eventually become the definitive discussion on .223/5.56mm defensive/training loads with similar POI once the wealth of knowledge on this forum has weighed in.
Certainly, most of my training takes place at distances of 100 yards or less. But I also train to take longer shots and keep my skills sharp in that area. As a civilian, it is unlikely that I'll need to take a defensive shot at such distances, but I'd prefer having the capability, since it may be the bad guy who makes the decision about what distance an engagement takes place, not me. Besides, it seems the whole point of having a carbine/rifle is to give you a platform capable of good accuracy and performance beyond 100 yards, otherwise we'd all just use a 12 gauge with buckshot and slugs.
So, with my stated goals in mind, I'd like to find a good quality defensive load high on DocGKR's approved list as my primary defensive ammunition, and a cheap, widely available FMJ round that matches the ballistics of the defensive load as closely as possible from 0-300 yards that won't require re-zeroing when switching between the two. I am hoping someone here has already contemplated this issue and found a solution they can share with me.
Some of the possible combos I'm looking at include:
Option A
Defensive Load: Federal/Black Hills/Barnes .223 55 gr TSX
Training Load: Federal/Fiocchi/UMC/PMC/Wolf .223 55 gr FMJ
Option B
Defensive Load: Federal Tactical/Federal Fusion .223 62 gr JSP
Training Load: Prvi Partizan/Winchester USA/Wolf .223 62 gr FMJ
Option C
Defensive Load: Speer 5.56mm 55 gr Gold Dot
Training Load: Federal/Winchester/Prvi/PMC/IMI 55 gr M193 FMJ
Option D
Defensive Load: Federal Mk318 5.56mm 62 gr SOST
Training Load: Federal/Winchester/Prvi/PMC/IMI 62 gr M855
Option E
Defensive Load: Hornady .223 75 gr OTM TAP
Training Load: Hornady .223 75 gr OTM Steel Case practice ammo
It appears those are the options to give me the best chance of finding what I'm looking for, although enough variances still exist between some of them to perhaps make some less ideal than others.
Also, the load I would otherwise most favor for defensive use (Black Hills 5.56mm 50 gr TSX #D556N1) seems the least likely of the approved defensive loads to have a similar performing, inexpensive, training counterpart. Maybe M193 would suffice? Perhaps the Federal 50 gr value pack JHP? I dunno. One is heavier. The other is .223 spec and has considerably less velocity.
Again, I figure this is an issue many people have contemplated before. So feel free to offer suggestions based on your experiences. Also, FWIW, I am leaning more toward a barrier blind load. While such a load may not be as critical for civilian self defense as for law enforcement duties, one also can't rule out such a need. Even without auto bodies and windshields to contend with, things such as interior doors, pieces of furniture, windows or even the bones within an arm that may be in front of the torso of your attacker could make a barrier blind load a much better choice. It simply works effectively in more situations.
Thanks in advance for suggestions and discussion. I apologize for being a bit overly detailed in my post, but there was quite a bit of ground to cover. Perhaps this post can eventually become the definitive discussion on .223/5.56mm defensive/training loads with similar POI once the wealth of knowledge on this forum has weighed in.