F'in A right!!
That's fine, if you really know what works for you.
Or its used as an easy way to avoid an argument/discussion that may prove them wrong.
I've about given up on these types..
"I went to Gunsite, in 1985!"
" I qualify!"
"You spend your own money!"
Etc., it wouldn't be so bad, but then I might have to rely on these guys.
Steyr,
If you feel you know "what works for you", and that new techniques won't be of any value, why continue to take courses?
One thing that I think about varying techniques...
I believe there is the ultimate technique, the one that scientifically, physically, whatever is the best technique.
Unfortunately, there are alot of techniques that are very close, close enough it may not matter, if the individual does not have the training resources, or willingness to really get to the point where you can see/tell the difference. Or if standards are relatively low, etc etc.
So we end up with, "it works for me".
Kinda like, and don't laugh,... love. Yea, maybe there is one true "soul mate" for you, but there are plenty of close enough's.
And the guy, who claims he actually likes, what every other guy in the world see's as a flaw. " I like that my wife bitches at me all the time". Because its better to live in denial then start over again.
Bob